Traumatic Resin Ducts and Polyphenolic Parenchyma Cells in Conifers

  • Paal Krokene
  • Nina Elisabeth Nagy
  • Trygve Krekling


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alfaro RI (1995) An induced defense reaction in white spruce to attack by the white-pine weevil, Pissodes strobe. Can J For Res 25:1725–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfaro RI, VanAkker L, Jaquish B, King J (2004) Weevil resistance of progeny derived from putatively resistant and susceptible interior spruce parents. For Ecol Man 202:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfieri FJ, Evert RF (1973) Structure and seasonal development of secondary phloem in Pinaceae. Bot Gaz 134:17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bannan MW (1936) Vertical resin ducts in the secondary wood of the abietineae. New Phytol. 35:11–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bois E, Lieutier F (1997) Phenolic response of Scots pine clones to inoculation with Leptographium wingfieldii, a fungus associated with Tomicus piniperda. Plant Physiol Biochem 35:819–825Google Scholar
  6. Bonello P, Gordon TR, Storer AJ (2001) Systemic induced resistance in Monterey pine. For Pathol 31:99–106Google Scholar
  7. Bonello P, Blodgett JT (2003) Pinus nigraSphaeropsis sapinea as a model pathosystem to investigate local and systemic effects of fungal infection of pines. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 63:249–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bordasch RP, Berryman AA (1977) Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). 2. Repellency of Abies grandis resins and some monoterpenes. Can Entomol 109:95–100Google Scholar
  9. Brignolas F, Lacroix B, Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Drouet A, Claudot AC, Yart A, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (1995a) Induced responses in phenolic metabolism in two Norway spruce clones after wounding and inoculation with Ophiostoma polonicum, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Plant Physiol 109:821–827Google Scholar
  10. Brignolas F, Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Yart A, Drouet A, Claudot AC (1995b) Changes in soluble-phenol content of Norway-spruce (Picea abies) phloem in response to wounding and inoculation with Ophiostoma polonicum. Eur J For Pathol 25:253–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brignolas F, Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Christiansen E, Berryman AA (1998) Phenolic predictors for Norway spruce resistance to the bark beetle lps typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and an associated fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Can J For Res 28:720–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cates RG, Alexander H (1982) Host resistance and susceptibility. In: Mitton JB, Sturgeon KB (eds) Bark beetles in North American conifers. A system for the study of evolutionary biology. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 212–263Google Scholar
  13. Charon J, Launay J, Carde J-P (1987) Spatial organization and volume density of leucoplasts in pine secretory cells. Protoplasma 138:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Christiansen E, Franceschi VR, Nagy NE, Krekling T, Berryman AA, Krokene P, Solheim H (1999a) Traumatic resin duct formation in Norway spruce after wounding or infection with a bark beetle-associated blue-stain fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. In: Lieutier F, Mattson WJ, Wagner MR (eds) Physiology and genetics of tree-phytophage interactions. Les Colloques de I’INRA, INRA Editions, Versailles, pp 79–89Google Scholar
  15. Christiansen E, Krokene P, Berryman AA, Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Lieutier F, Lönneborg A, Solheim H (1999b) Mechanical injury and fungal infection induce acquired resistance in Norway spruce. Tree Physiol 19:399–403Google Scholar
  16. Cook SP, Hain FP (1988) Toxicity of host monoterpenes to Dendroctonus frontalis and Ips calligraphus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J Entomol Sci 23:287–292Google Scholar
  17. Day RC, Grossniklaus U, Macknight RC (2005) Be more specific! Laser-assisted microdissection of plant cells. Trends Plant Sci 10:397–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995) Stress-induced phenylpropanoid meatabolism. Plant Cell7:1085–1097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Emmert-Buck MR, Bonner RF, Smith PD, Chuaqui RF, Zhuang ZP, Goldstein SR, Weiss RA, Liotta LA (1996) Laser capture microdissection. Science 274:998–1001PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Erbilgin N, Kroken, P, Christiansen E, Zeneli G, Gershenzon J (2006) Exogenous application of methyl jasmonate elicits defenses in Norway spruce (Picea abies) and reduces host colonization by the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oecologia 148:426–436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evensen PC, Solheim H, Høiland K, Stenersen J (2000) Induced resistance of Norway spruce, variation of phenolic compounds and their effects on fungal pathogens. For Pathol 30:97–108Google Scholar
  22. Fahn A (1990) Plant anatomy. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Fahn A (1979) Resin ducts of the coniferae. In: Secretory tissues in plants. Academic Press,LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Farjon A (2001) World checklist and bibliography of conifers, 2nd edn. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  25. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. In: Wallace JW, Mansell RT (eds)Biochemichal interaction between plants and insects. Plenum Press, New York, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  26. Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (1998) Specialized phloem parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Pinaceae) bark are an important site of defense reactions. Am J Bot 85:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Krekling T, Christiansen E (2000) Phloem parenchyma cells are involved in local and distant defense responses to fungal inoculation or bark beetle attack in Norway spruce (Pinaceae). Am J Bot 87:314–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Franceschi VR, Krekling T, Christiansen E (2002) Application of methyl jasmonate on Picea abies (Pinaceae) stems induces defense related responses in phloem and xylem. Am J Bot89:578–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T (2005) Anatomical and chemical defences of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests (Tansley Review). New Phytol 167:353–376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gershenzon J, Croteau RB (1991). Terpenoids. In: Rosenthal GA, Berenbaum MR (eds) Herbivores: their interactions with secondary plant metabolites. Vol I, the chemical participants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 165–219Google Scholar
  31. Gijzen M, Lewinsohn E, Savage TJ, Croteau RB (1993) Conifer monoterpenes – biochemistry and bark beetle chemical ecology. ACS Symp. Ser. 525:8–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heady RD, Banks JG, Evans PD (2002) Wood anatomy of wollemi pine (Wollemia nobilis, Araucariaceae). IAWA Journal 23:339–357Google Scholar
  33. Hudgins JW, Christiansen E, Franceschi VR (2003a) Methyl jasmonate induced changes mimicking anatomical defenses in diverse members of the Pinaceae. Tree Physiol 23:361–371Google Scholar
  34. Hudgins JW, Krekling T, Franceschi VR (2003b) Distribution of calcium oxalate crystals in the secondary phloem of conifers: a constitutive defense mechanism? New Phytol 159:677–690Google Scholar
  35. Hudgins JW, Christiansen E, Franceschi VR (2004) Induction of anatomically based defense responses in stems of diverse conifers by methyl jasmonate: a phylogenetic perspective. Tree Physiol 24:251–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Hudgins JW, Franceschi VR (2004) Methyl jasmonate-induced ethylene production is responsible for conifer phloem defense responses and reprogramming of stem cambial zone for traumatic resin duct formation. Plant Physiol 13:2134–2149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson MA, Croteau R (1987) Biochemistry of conifer resistance to bark beetles and their fungal symbionts. In: Fuller G, Nes WD (eds) Ecology and metabolism of plant lipids. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 76–92Google Scholar
  38. Kartuch B, Karuch R, Weilgong P (1991) Site-specific differences in calcium oxalate content of the secondary phloem of spruce (Picea abies Karst). Flora 185:377–384Google Scholar
  39. Klepzig KD, Kruger EL, Smalley EB, Raffa KF (1995) Effects of biotic and abiotic stress on induced accumulation of terpenes and phenolics in red pines inoculated with bark beetle-vectored fungus. J Chem Ecol 21:601–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Krekling T, Franceschi VR, Berryman AA, Christiansen E (2000) The structure and development of polyphenolic parenchyma cells in Norway spruce (Picea abies) bark. Flora 195:354–369Google Scholar
  41. Krekling T, Franceschi VR, Krokene P, Solheim H (2004) Differential anatomical responses of Norway spruce tissues to sterile and fungus-infected wounding. Trees 18:1–9Google Scholar
  42. Krokene P, Christiansen E, Solheim H, Berryman AA, Franceschi VR (1999) Induced resistance to pathogenic fungi in Norway spruce. Plant Physiol 121:565–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krokene P, Nagy NE, Solheim H (2008) Methyl jasmonate and oxalic acid treatment of Norway spruce: anatomically based defence responses and increased resistance against fungal infection. Tree Physiol 28:29–35PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Krokene P, Solheim H, Langström B (2000) Fungal infection and mechanical wounding induce disease resistance in Scots pine. Eur J Plant Pathol 106:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Krokene P, Solheim H, Christiansen E (2003) Inducible anatomical defense responses in Norway spruce stems and their possible role in induced resistance. Tree Physiol 23:191–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kwon M, Davin LB, Lewis NG (2001) In situ hybridization and immunolocalization of lignan reductases in woody tissue: implications for heartwood formation and other forms for vascular tissue preservation. Phytochemistry 57:899–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kytö M, Niemelä P, Annila E (1996) Vitality and bark beetle resistance of fertilized Norway spruce. For Ecol Manag 84:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lewinsohn E, Gijzen M, Croteau R (1991) Defense-mechanisms of conifers – differences in constitutive and wound-induced monoterpene biosynthesis among species. Plant Physiol96:44–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Li SH, Schneider B, Gershenzon J (2007). Microchemical analysis of laser-microdissected stone cells of Norway spruce by cryogenic nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Planta 225:771–779PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lieutier F, Yart A, Jay-Allemand C, Delorme L (1991) Preliminary investigations on phenolics as a response of Scots pine phloem to attacks by bark beetles and associated fungi. Eur J For Pathol 21:354–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lieutier F, Sauvard D, Brignolas F, Picron V, Yart A, Bastien C, Jay-Allemand C (1996) Changes in phenolic metabolites of Scots-pine phloem induced by Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum, a bark-beetle-associated fungus. Eur J For Pathol 26:145–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lieutier F, Brignolas F, Sauvard D, Yart A, Galet C, Brunet M, van de Sype H (2003) Intra- and inter-provenance variability in phloem phenols of Picea abies and relationship to a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiol 23:247–256PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lindberg M, Lundgren L, Gref R, Johansson M (1992) Stilbenes and resin acids in relation to the penetration of Heterobasidion annosum through the bark of Picea abies. Eur J For Pathol 22:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lombardero MJ, Ayres MP, Lorio PL, Ruel JJ (2000) Environmental effects on constitutive and inducible resin defences of Pinus taeda. Ecol Lett 3:329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Martin D, Tholl D, Gershenzon J, Bohlmann J (2002) Methyl jasmonate induces traumatic resin ducts, terpenoid resin biosynthesis, and terpenoid accumulation in developing xylem of Norway spruce stems. Plant Physiol 129:1003–1018PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Miller B, Madilao LL, Ralph S, Bohlmann J (2005) Insect-induced conifer defense. White pine weevil and methyl jasmonate induce traumatic resinosis, de novo formed volatile emissions, and accumulation of terpenoid synthase and putative octadecanoid pathway transcripts in Sitka spruce. Plant Physiol 137:369–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Murmanis L, Evert RF (1967) Parenchyma cells of secondary phloem in Pinus strobus. Planta 73:301–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nagy NE, Fossdal CG, Krokene P, Krekling T, Lönneborg A, Solheim H (2004) Induced responses to pathogen infection in Norway spruce phloem: changes in polyphenolic parenchyma cells, chalcone synthase transcript levels and peroxidase activity. Tree Physiol24:505–515PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Nagy NE, Franceschi VR, Solheim H, Krekling T, Christiansen E (2000) Wound-induced traumatic resin duct development in stems of Norway spruce (Pinaceae): anatomy and cytochemical traits. Am J Bot 87:302–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nagy NE, Krokene P, Solheim H (2006) Anatomical-based defense responses of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) stems to two fungal pathogens. Tree Physiol 26:159–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Ohtsu K, Takahashi H, Schnable PS, Nakazono M (2007) Cell type-specific gene expression profiling in plants by using a combination of laser microdissection and high-throughput technologies. Plant Cell Physiol 48:3–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paine TD, Blanche CA, Nebeker TE, Stephen FM (1987) Composition of loblolly pine resin defenses: comparison of monoterpenes from induced lesion and sapwood resin. Can J For Res 17:1202–1206Google Scholar
  63. Paine TD, Raffa KF, Harrington TC (1997) Interactions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers. Ann Rev Entomol 42:179–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parham RA, Kaustinen HM (1976) Differential staining of tannin in sections of epoxy-embedded plant cells. Stain Technol 51:237–240PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Penhallow DP (1907) A manual of the North American gymnosperms: exclusive of the Cycadales but together with certain exotic species. Athenaeum Press, Boston, MA. pp 404Google Scholar
  66. Phillips MA, Croteau RB (1999) Resin-based defense in conifers. Trends Plant Sci 4:184–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1982) Accumulation of monoterpenes and associated volatiles following inoculation of grand fir with a fungus transmitted by the fir engraver Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 114:797–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Raffa KF, Berryman AA (1983). Physiological aspects of lodgepole pine wound responses to a fungal symbiont of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can Entomol 115:723–734Google Scholar
  69. Raffa KF, Berryman AA, Simasko J, Teal W, Wong BL (1985) Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and its symbiotic fungus. Environ Entomol 14:552–556Google Scholar
  70. Ralph SG, Hudgins JW, Jancsik S, Franceschi VR, Bohlmann J (2007) Aminocyclopropane carboxylic acid synthase is a regulated step in ethylene-dependent induced conifer defense. Full-length cDNA cloning of a multigene family, differential constitutive, and wound- and insect-induced expression, and cellular and subcellular localization in spruce and Douglas fir. Plant Physiol 143:410–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reglinski T, Stavely FJL, Taylor JT (1998) Induction of phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity and control of Sphaeropsis sapinea infection in Pinus radiata by 5-chlorosalicylic acid. Eur J For Pathol 28:153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Reid RW, Whitney HS, Watson JA (1967) Reactions of lodgepole pine to attack by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins and blue stain fungus. Can J Bot 45:1115–1126Google Scholar
  73. Richard S, Lapointe G, Rutledge G, Séguin A (2000) Induction of chalcone synthase expression in white spruce by wounding and jasmonate. Plant Cell Physiol 41:982–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ruel JJ, Ayres MP, Lorio PL (1998) Loblolly pine responds to mechanical wounding with increased resin flow. Can J For Res 28:596–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Russell CE, Berryman AA (1976) Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle. 1. Monoterpene composition of Abies grandis pitch blisters and fungus-infected wounds. Can J Bot 54:14–18Google Scholar
  76. Schmidt A, Zeneli G, Hietala AM, Fossdal CG, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Gershenzon J (2005) Induced chemical defenses in conifers: biochemical and molecular approaches to studying their function. In: Romeo J (ed) Chemical ecology and phytochemistry of forests and forest ecosytems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  77. Shain L (1967) Resistance of sapwood in stems of loblolly pine to infection by Fomes annosus. Phytopathology 57:1034–1045Google Scholar
  78. Shrimpton DM, Whitney HS (1968) Inhibition of growth of blue stain fungi by wood extractives. Can J Bot 46:757–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tomlin ES, Alfaro RI, Borden JH, He FL (1998) Histological response of resistant and susceptible white spruce to simulated white pine weevil damage. Tree Physiol 18: 21–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Tomlin ES, Antonejevic E, Alfaro RI, Borden JH (2000) Changes in volatile terpene and diterpene resin acid composition of resistant and susceptible white spruce leaders exposed to simulated white pine weevil damage. Tree Physiol 20:1087–1095PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Vanderwel D, Oehlschlager AC (1987) Biosynthesis of pheromones and endocrine regulation of pheromone production in Coleoptera. In: Prestwich GD, Blomquist GJ (eds) Pheromone biochemistry. Academic Press, New York, pp 175–215Google Scholar
  82. Vité JP (1961) The influence of water supply on oleoresin exudation pressure and resistance to bark beetle attack in Pinus ponderosa. Contributions from the Boyce Thompson Institute 21:37–66Google Scholar
  83. Viiri H, Annila E, Kitunen V, Niemela P (2001) Induced responses in stilbenes and terpenes in fertilized Norway spruce after inoculation with blue-stain fungus, Ceratocystis polonica. Trees 15:112–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wainhouse D, Cross DJ, Howell RS (1990) The role of lignin as a defense against the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans – effect on larvae and adults. Oecologia 85:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wainhouse D, Rose DR, Peace AJ (1997) The influence of preformed defences on the dynamic wound response in spruce bark. Funct Ecol 11:564–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Werker E, Fahn A (1969) Resin ducts of Pinus halepensis Mill.—their structure, development and pattern of arrangement. Bot J Linn Soc 62:379–411Google Scholar
  87. Wu H, Hu ZH (1997) Comparative anatomy of resin ducts of the Pinaceae. Trees Struct Funct 11:135–143Google Scholar
  88. Zeneli G, Krokene P, Christiansen E, Krekling T, Gershenzon J (2006) Methyl jasmonate treatment of large Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees increases the accumulation of terpenoid resin components and protects against infection by Ceratocystis polonica, a bark beetle-associated fungus. Tree Physiol 26:977–988PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paal Krokene
    • 1
  • Nina Elisabeth Nagy
  • Trygve Krekling
  1. 1.Norwegian Forest and Landscape InstituteN-1432 ÅsNorway

Personalised recommendations