Induced Defenses and the Cost-Benefit Paradigm

  • Anke Steppuhn
  • Ian T. Baldwin


Jasmonic Acid Allocation Cost Defense Cost Specialist Herbivore Herbivore Attack 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal AA, Conner JK, Johnson MTJ, Wallsgrove R (2002) Ecological genetics of an induced plant defense against herbivores: additive genetic variance and costs of phenotypic plasticity. Evolution 56:2206–2213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ (1999) Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agren J, Schemske DW (1993) The cost of defense against herbivores: an experimental study of trichome production in Brassica rapa. Am Nat 141:338–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alborn HT, Turlings TCJ, Jones TH, Stenhagen G, Loughrin JH, Tumlinson JH (1997) An elicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science 276:945–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin IT (1989) Mechanism of damage-induced alkaloid production in wild tobacco. J Chem Ecol 15:1661–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin IT (1991) Damage-induced alkaloids in wild tobacco. In: Raupp MJ, Tallamy DW (eds) Phytochemical induction by herbivores. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 47–49Google Scholar
  7. Baldwin IT (1998) Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8113–8118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldwin IT, Gorham D, Schmelz EA, Lewandowski CA, Lynds GY (1998) Allocation of nitrogen to an inducible defense and seed production in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia 115:541–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldwin IT, Karb MJ, Ohnmeiss TE (1994) Allocation of N-15 from nitrate to nicotine – production and turnover of a damage-induced mobile defense. Ecology 75:1703–1713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baldwin IT, Oesch RC, Merhige PM, Hayes K (1993) Damage-induced root nitrogen metabolism in Nicotiana sylvestris – testing C/N predictions for alkaloid production. J Chem Ecol 19:3029–3043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baldwin IT, Preston CA (1999) The eco-physiological complexity of plant responses to insect herbivores. Planta 208:137–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baldwin IT, Sims CL, Kean SE (1990) The reproductive consequences associated with inducible alkaloidal responses in wild tobacco. Ecology 71:252–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barbosa P, Gross P, Kemper J (1991) Influence of plant allelochemicals on the tobacco hornworm and its parasitoid Cotesia congregata. Ecology 72:1567–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berenbaum M, Neal JJ (1985) Synergism between myristicin and xanthotoxin, a naturally co-occurring plant toxicant. J Chem Ecol 11:1349–1358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berenbaum MR (1985) Brementown revisited: interactions among allelochemicals in plants. Rec Adv Phytochem 19:139–169Google Scholar
  16. Berenbaum MR, Zangerl AR, Nitao JK (1986) Constraints on chemical coevolution: wild parsnips and the parsnip webworm. Evolution 40:1215–1228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bergelson J, Purrington CB (1996) Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am Nat 148:536–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bergelson J, Purrington CB, Palm CJ, LopezGutierrez JC (1996) Costs of resistance: a test using transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 263:1659–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Birk Y (ed) (2003) Plant protease inhibitors; significance in nutrition, plant protection, cancer prevention and genetic engineering. Springer, Berlin, p 170Google Scholar
  20. Broadway RM, Duffey SS (1988) The effect of plant protein quality on insect digestive physiology and the toxicity of plant proteinase inhibitors. J Insect Physiol 34:1111–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bryant JP, Chapin FS, Klein DR (1983) Carbon nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chintapakorn Y, Hamill JD (2003) Antisense-mediated down-regulation of putrescine N-methyltransferase activity in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. can lead to elevated levels of anatabine at the expense of nicotine. Plant Mol Biol 53:87–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cipollini DF (2002) Does competition magnify the fitness costs of induced responses in Arabidopsis thaliana? A manipulative approach. Oecologia 131:514–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cipollini D (2007) Consequences of the overproduction of methyl jasmonate on seed production, tolerance to defoliation and competitive effect and response of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol 173:146–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cipollini D, Purrington CB, Bergelson J (2003) Costs of induced responses in plants. Basic Appl Ecol 4:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cipollini DF, Sipe ML (2001) Jasmonic acid treatment and mammalian herbivory differentially affect chemical defenses and growth of wild mustard (Brassica kaber). Chemoecology 11: 137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:355–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1992) Cost and benefits of chemical information conveyance: proximate and ultimate factors. In: Roitberg BD, Isman MB (eds) Insect chemical ecology. An evolutionary approach. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 122–155Google Scholar
  29. Dyer LA, Dodson CD, Stireman JO, Tobler MA, Smilanich AM, Fincher RM, Letourneau DK (2003) Synergistic effects of three Piper amides on generalist and specialist herbivores. J Chem Ecol 29:2499–2514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feeny P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. Recent Adv Phytochem 10:1–40Google Scholar
  31. Felton GW, Broadway RM, Duffey SS (1989) Inactivation of protease inhibitor activity by plant-derived quinones: complications for host-plant resistance against noctuid herbivores. J Insect Physiol 35:981–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giri AP, Wunsche H, Mitra S, Zavala JA, Muck A, Svatos A, Baldwin IT (2006) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VII. Changes in the plant’s proteome. Plant Physiol 142:1621–1641PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glawe GA, Zavala JA, Kessler A, Van Dam NM, Baldwin IT (2003) Ecological costs and benefits correlated with trypsin protease inhibitor production in Nicotiana attenuata. Ecology 84:79–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Govenor HL, Schultz JC, Appel HM (1997) Impact of dietary allelochemicals on gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) caterpillars: importance of midgut alkalinity. J Insect Physiol 43:1169–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Green TR, Ryan CA (1972) Wound-induced proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves: a possible defense mechanism against insects. Science 175:776–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Green ES, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (2001) Effects of phytic acid and xanthotoxin on growth and detoxification in caterpillars. J Chem Ecol 27:1763–1773PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Halitschke R, Baldwin IT (2003) Antisense LOX expression increases herbivore performance by decreasing defense responses and inhibiting growth-related transcriptional reorganization in Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J 36:794–807PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Halitschke R, Baldwin IT (2004) Jasmonates and related compounds in plant–insect interactions. J Plant Growth Regul 23:238–245Google Scholar
  39. Halitschke R, Gase K, Hui D, Schmidt DD, Baldwin IT (2003) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. VI. Microarray analysis reveals that most herbivore-specific transcriptional changes are mediated by fatty acid–amino acid conjugates. Plant Physiol 131:1894–1902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Halitschke R, Schittko U, Pohnert G, Boland W, Baldwin IT (2001) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. III. Fatty acid–amino acid conjugates in herbivore oral secretions are necessary and sufficient for herbivore- specific plant responses. Plant Physiol 125:711–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Halitschke R, Stenberg JA, Kessler D, Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2007) Shared signals – ‘alarm calls’ from plants increase apparency to herbivores and their enemies in nature. Ecol Lett doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01123.xGoogle Scholar
  42. Heidel AJ, Clarke JD, Antonovics J, Dong XN (2004) Fitness costs of mutations affecting the systemic acquired resistance pathway in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 168:2197–2206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heil M, Baldwin IT (2002) Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. Trends Plant Sci 7:61–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Bio 67:283–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Juenger T, Bergelson J (2000) The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Karban R, Agrawal AA, Mangel M (1997) The benefits of induced defenses against herbivores. Ecology 78:1351–1355Google Scholar
  47. Karban R, Baldwin IT (1997) Induced responses to herbivory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  48. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2001) Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 291:2141–2144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kessler A, Baldwin IT (2004) Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata. Plant J 38:639–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kessler A, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT (2004) Silencing the jasmonate cascade: induced plant defenses and insect populations. Science 305:665–668PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Krischik VA, Denno RF (1983) Individual, population, and geographic patterns in plant defense. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 463–512Google Scholar
  52. Laing W, McManus MT (2002) Proteinase inhibitors. In: McManus MT, Laing WA, Allan AC (eds) In protein–protein interactions in plant biology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 77–119Google Scholar
  53. Lerdau M, Litvak M, Monson R (1994) Plant chemical defense: monoterpenes and the growth-differentiation balance hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 9:58–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McKey D (1974) Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. Am Nat 108:305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Metodiev MV, Tsonev TD, Popova LP (1996) Effect of jasmonic acid on the stomatal and nonstomatal limitation of leaf photosynthesis in barley leaves. J Plant Growth Regul 15:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mitchell-Olds T, Schmitt J (2006) Genetic mechanisms and evolutionary significance of natural variation in Arabidopsis. Nature 441:947–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mitchell-Olds T, Siemens D, Pedersen D (1996) Physiology and costs of resistance to herbivory and disease in Brassica. Entomol Exp Appl 80:231–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mithöfer A, Wanner G, Boland W (2005) Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. II. Continuous mechanical wounding resembling insect feeding is sufficient to elicit herbivory-related volatile emission. Plant Physiol 137:1160–1168Google Scholar
  59. Mur LAJ, Kenton P, Atzorn R, Miersch O, Wasternack C (2006) The outcomes of concentration-specific interactions between salicylate and jasmonate signaling include synergy, antagonism, and oxidative stress leading to cell death. Plant Physiol 140:249–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nelson AC, Kursar TA (1999) Interactions among plant defense compounds: a method for analysis. Chemoecology 9:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ohnmeiss TE, Baldwin IT (2000) Optimal defense theory predicts the ontogeny of an induced nicotine defense. Ecology 81:1765–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Plagnol V, Padhukasahasram B, Wall JD, Marjoram P, Nordborg M (2005) Relative influences of crossing-over and gene conversion on the pattern of linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 172:2441–2448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Redman AM, Cipollini DF, Schultz JC (2001) Fitness costs of jasmonic acid-induced defense in tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Oecologia 126:380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reinbothe S, Mollenhauer B, Reinbothe C (1994) JIPs and RIPs: the regulation of plant gene expression by jasmonates in response to environmental cues and pathogens. Plant Cell 6: 1197–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reymond P, Bodenhausen N, Van Poecke RMP, Krishnamurthy V, Dicke M, Farmer EE (2004) A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. Plant Cell 16:3132–3147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Royo J, León J, Vancanneyt G, Albar JP, Rosahl S, Ortego F, Castañera P, Sánchez-Serrano JJ (1999) Antisense-mediated depletion of a potato lipoxygenase reduces wound induction of proteinase inhibitors and increases weight gain of insect pests. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 1146–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ryan CA (1983) Insect-induced chemical signals regulating natural plant protection responses. In: Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable plants and herbivores in natural managed systems, Academic Press, New York, pp 43–60Google Scholar
  68. Schwachtje J, Minchin PEH, Jahnke S, van Dongen JT, Schittko U, Baldwin IT (2006) SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:12935–12940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1987) Costs and benefits of plant resistance to herbivory. Am Nat 130:570–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Simms EL, Rausher MD (1989) The evolution of resistance to herbivory in Ipomoea purpurea. II. Natural selection by insects and costs of resistance. Evolution 43:573–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Steppuhn A, Baldwin IT (2007) Resistance management in a native plant: nicotine prevents herbivores from compensating for plant protease inhibitors. Ecol Lett 10:499–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Steppuhn A, Gase K, Krock B, Halitschke R, Baldwin IT (2004) Nicotine’s defensive function in nature. PLoS Biol 2:1074–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stowe KA (1998) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 17:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Strauss SY, Siemens DH, Decher MB, Mitchell-Olds T (1999) Ecological costs of plant resistance to herbivores in the currency of pollination. Evolution 53:1105–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Takabayashi J, Dicke M (1996) Plant-carnivore mutualism through herbivore-induced carnivore attractants. Trends Plant Sci 1:109–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thomma BPHJ, Eggermont K, Penninckx IAMA, Mauch-Mani B, Vogelsang R, Cammue BPA, Broekaert WF (1998) Separate jasmonate-dependent and salicylate-dependent defense response pathways in Arabidopsis are essential for resistance to distinct microbial pathogenes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:15107–15111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tian D, Traw MB, Chen JQ, Kreitman M, Bergelson J (2003) Fitness costs of R-gene-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 423:74–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. van Dam NM, Baldwin IT (1998) Costs of jasmonate-induced responses in plants competing for limiting resources. Ecol Lett 1:30–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van Dam NM, Hermenau U, Baldwin IT (2001) Instar-specific sensitivity of specialist Manduca sexta larvae to induced defences in their host plant Nicotiana attenuata. Ecol Entomol 26: 578–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. van Hulten M, Pelser M, van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ, Ton J (2006) Costs and benefits of priming for defense in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:5602–5607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Voelckel C, Baldwin IT (2004a) Generalist and specialist lepidopteran larvae elicit different transcriptional responses in Nicotiana attenuata, which correlate with larval FAC profiles. Ecol Lett 7:770–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Voelckel C, Baldwin IT (2004b) Herbivore-induced plant vaccination. Part II. Array-studies reveal the transience of herbivore-specific transcriptional imprints and a distinct imprint from stress combinations. Plant J 38:650–663Google Scholar
  84. Voelckel C, Krügel T. Gase K, Heidrich N, van Dam NM, Winz R, Baldwin IT (2001) Anti-sense expression of putrescine N-methyltransferase confirms defensive role of nicotine in Nicotiana sylvestris against Manduca sexta. Chemoecology 11:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vrieling K, deJong TJ, Klinkhamer PGL, van der Meijden E, van der VeenvanWijk CAM (1996) Testing trade-offs among growth, regrowth and anti-herbivore defences in Senecio jacobaea. Entomol Exp Appl 80:189–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wasternack C, Ortel B, Miersch O, Kramell R, Beale M, Greulich F, Feussner I, Hause B, Krumm T, Boland W, Parthier B (1998) Diversity in octadecanoid-induced gene expression of tomato. J Plant Physiol 152:345–352Google Scholar
  87. Winz RA, Baldwin IT (2001) Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. IV. Insect-induced ethylene reduces jasmonate-induced nicotine accumulation by regulating putrescine N-methyltransferase transcripts. Plant Physiol 125:2189–2202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wu J, Hettenhausen C, Meldau S, Baldwin IT (2007) Herbivory rapidly activates MAPK signaling in attacked and unattacked leaf regions but not between leaves of Nicotiana attenuata. Plant Cell 19:1096–1122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zangerl AR, Bazzaz FA (1992) Theory and pattern in plant defense allocation. In: Fritz RS, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens. Ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 363–391Google Scholar
  90. Zavala JA, Baldwin IT (2004) Fitness benefits of trypsin proteinase inhibitor expression in Nicotiana attenuata are greater than their costs when plants are attacked. BMC Ecol 4:11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Baldwin IT (2004a) Manipulation of endogenous trypsin proteinase inhibitor production in Nicotiana attenuata demonstrates their function as antiherbivore defenses. Plant Physiol 134:1181–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2004b) Constitutive and inducible trypsin proteinase inhibitor production incurs large fitness costs in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1607–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Zavala JA, Patankar AG, Gase K, Baldwin IT (2004b) Constitutive and inducible trypsin proteinase inhibitor production incurs large fitness costs in Nicotiana attenuata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:1607–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anke Steppuhn
  • Ian T. Baldwin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular EcologyMax Planck Institute for Chemical EcologyD-07745 JenaGermany

Personalised recommendations