Skip to main content

The Conservation of Habitat and Landscape

  • Chapter
Conservation Biology

In this chapter you will learn:

  1. 1.

    Concepts and definitions of habitat and landscape and the role of habitat conservation in conservation biology

  2. 2.

    Definitions of habitat heterogeneity and patch dynamics

  3. 3.

    Specific mechanisms through which habitat loss, fragmentation, and isolation threaten biodiversity

  4. 4.

    Principles of reserve design and their role in habitat conservation

  5. 5.

    Means of reducing the impacts of human disturbance to conserve habitat and habitat-dependent populations in non-reserve environments

Habitat can be defined as the physical and biological surroundings of an organism (Bolen and Robinson 1995) or, more precisely, as sites having appropriate levels of the biotic and abiotic features required by a species for survival and reproduction (Pearson 2002). That is, habitats are arrangements of resources that meet the needs of individual species. Although we often “name” habitats according to the dominant vegetation present in them (for example, “sagebrush habitat,” “grassland habitat,” or “forest habitat”) we should recognize from the outset that the vegetation communities we might use to label habitats are not the same as the habitat itself, although they may be associated with it. Habitats are usually conceived as occurring in patches, which can be defined as contiguous regions of the same kind of habitat (Pearson 2002) or as sites where the habitat conditions of a species are realized. Patches often exist in networks in which a collection of spatially distinct patches is connected by linear elements (structural definition) and linked by a flow of individuals from patch to patch (functional definition) (Opdam 2002:318). If this is what we mean by “habitat,” what do we mean by “landscape?”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alverson, W. S., D. M. Waller, and S. L. Solheim. 1988. Forests too deer: edge effects in northern Wisconsin. Conservation Biology 2:348–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. F. 1987. Conservation of mammals within a fragmented forest environment: the contributions of insular biogeography and autecology. In: D. A. Saunders, G. W. Arnold, A. A. Burbidge, and A. J. M. Hopkins (eds) Nature conservation: the role of remnants of native vegetation. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, Australia, pp 41–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, A. F. 1990. Habitat corridors and the conservation of small mammals in a fragmented forest environment. Landscape Ecology 4:109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolen, E. G., and W. L. Robinson. 1995. Wildlife ecology and management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, M. (ed). 1997. Conservation and the use of wildlife resources. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielson, B. J. 1991. Communities in a landscape: the influence of habitat heterogeneity on the interactions between species. American Naturalist 138:1105–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffendorfer, J. E., N. A. Slade, M. S. Gaines, and R. D. Holt. 1995. Population dynamics of small mammals in fragmented and continuous old-field habitat. In: W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (ed) Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp 175–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Dmowski, K., and M. Kozakiewicz. 1990. Influence of a shrub corridor on movements of passerine birds to a lake littoral zone. Landscape Ecology 4:99–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. 1992. Relative importance of spatial and temporal scales in a patchy environment. Theoretical Population Biology 41:300–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L., and G. Merriam. 1985. Habitat patch connectivity and population survival. Ecology 66:1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L, and G. Merriam. 1995. Conservation of fragmented populations. In: D. Ehrenfeld (ed) Readings in conservation biology: the landscape perspective. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA, pp 16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Flather, C. H., M. Bevers, and J. Hof. 2002. Prescribed habitat layouts: analysis of optimal placement for landscape planning. In: K. J. Gutzwiller (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, pp 428–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. F., and R. T. T. Forman. 1987. Creating landscape patterns by forest cutting: ecological consequences and principles. Landscape Ecology 1:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyfogle, E. T. 2003. The land we share: private property and the common good. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, M. S., J. E. Diffendorfer, R. H. Tamarin, and T. S. Whittam. 1997. The effect of habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of small mammal populations. Journal of Heredity 88:294–304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. H., B. T. Milne, M. G. Turner, and R. V. O’Neill. 1987. Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1:19–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, E. J., S. M. Lietz, and J. M. Wright. 2003. Predicting the spatial distribution of aspen growth potential in the upper Great Lakes region. Forest Science 49:499–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, C. A. 1995. Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology 9:845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, L. 1991. Dispersal and connectivity in metapopulations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 42:89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, K. A., S. E. MacDonald, P. J. Burton, J. Chen, K. D. Brosofske, S. C. Saunders, E. S. Euskirchen, D. Roberts, M. S. Jaiteh, and P.-A. Esseen. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19:768–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1984. The fragmented forest: island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. D. 1988. Edge effects and conservation of biotic diversity. Conservation Biology 2:330–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, H. S., and D. J. Mladenhoff. 1999. Spatially explicit and stochastic simulation of forest-landscape fire disturbance and succession. Ecology 80:81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Henein, K., and G. Merriam. 1990. The elements of connectivity where corridor quality is variable. Landscape Ecology 4:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, M. L., G. L. Jacobson, and T. Webb III. 1988. Paleoecology and the coarse-filter approach to maintaining biological diversity. Conservation Biology 2:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivlev, V. S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, G., and D. J. Leopold. 1998. Habitat management for the eastern massasauga in a central New York peatland. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva, P., D. Skelly, and M. Ruckelshaus. 1997. Reevaluating the use of models to predict the consequences of habitat loss and fragmentation. In: S. T. A. Pickett, R. S. Ostfeld, M. Shachak, and G. E. Likens (eds) The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 163–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Keitt, T. H., A. Franklin, and D. L. Urban. 1995. Landscape analysis and population structure. In: Recovery plan for the Mexican spotted owl, volume II, technical and supporting information. US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, NM

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. C. 1989. Effects of forest fragmentation on dung and carrion beetle communities in Central Amazonia. Ecology 70:1715–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laudenslayer, W. F., Jr. 1986. Summary: predicting effects of habitat patchiness and fragmentation. In: J. Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph (eds) Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp 331–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F. 1995. Extinction and survival of rainforest mammals in a fragmented tropical landscape. In: W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (ed) Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp 46–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidicker, W. Z., Jr. 1995. The landscape concept: something old, something new. In: W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (ed) Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindstrom, E. 1989. Food limitation and social regulation in a red fox population. Holarctic Ecology 12:70–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabry, K. E., and G. W. Barrett. 2002. Effects of corridors on home range sizes and interpatch movements of three small mammal species. Landscape Ecology 17:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, C. L., and D. O. Loftsgaarden. 1980. A nonmapping technique for studying habitat preferences. Journal of Wildlife Management 44:963–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, S. D., S. E. Walker, and A. L. Rypstra. 2006. Two ecologically-divergent generalists predators have different responses to landscape fragmentation. Oikos 114:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, G. 1984. Connectivity: a fundamental ecological characteristic of landscape pattern. In: J. Brandt and P. Agger (eds) Proceedings on the First International Seminar on Methodology in Landscape Ecological Resources and Planning. International Association for Landscape Ecology, Roskilde, Denmark, pp 5–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, G. 1995. Movement in spatially divided populations: responses to landscape structure. In: W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (ed) Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp 64–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, G., and A. Lanoue. 1990. Corridor use by small mammals: field measurement for three experimental types of Peromyscus leucopus. Landscape Ecology 4:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu, C. W., C. R. Byers, J. M. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization- availability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38:541–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noon, B. R., and K. S. McKelvey. 1996. Management of the spotted owl: a case history in conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 27:135–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. 1987. Protecting natural areas in fragmented landscapes. Natural Areas Journal 7:2–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F., and A. Cooperrider. 1994. Saving nature’s legacy: protecting and restoring biodiversity. Defenders of Wildlife and Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F., and L. D. Harris. 1986. Nodes, networks, and MUMs: preserving diversity at all scales. Environmental Management 19:299–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F., M. A. O’Connell, and D. D. Murphy. 1997. The science of conservation planning. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohmann, J. L., and T. A. Spies. 1998. Regional gradient analysis and spatial pattern of woody plant communities of Oregon forests. Ecological Monographs 68:151–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen, T., and M. Schneider. 1995. The influence of habitat heterogeneity on predator-prey dynamics. In: W. Z. Lidicker, Jr. (ed) Landscape approaches in mammalian ecology and conservation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, pp 122–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdam, P. 2002. Assessing the Conservation Potential of Habitat Networks. In: K. J. Gutzwiller (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, pp 381–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostfeld, R. S., S. T. A. Pickett, M. Shachak, and G. E. Likens. 1997. Defining the scientific issues. In: S. T. A. Pickett, R. S. Ostfeld, M. Shackak, and G. E. Likens (eds) The ecological basis of conservation: heterogeneity, ecosystems, and biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. A. 1989. Soil biota and plants in the rehabilitation of degraded agricultural soils. In: J. D. Meier (ed) Animals in primary succession, the role of fauna in reclaimed lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 423–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, S. M. 2002. Interpreting landscape patterns from organism-based perspectives. In: S. E. Gergel and M. G. Turner (eds) Learning landscape ecology: a practical guide to concepts and techniques. Springer, New York, pp 187–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, S. T. A., and J. N. Thompson. 1978. Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves. Biological Conservation 13:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, D., S. Cairns, and T. Dillion. 1986. Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: M. E. Soulé (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp 182–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. K., F. R. Thompson, T. M. Donovan, D. R. Whitehead, and J. Faaborg. 1995. Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987–1990

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rondinini, C., S. Stuart and L. Boitani. 2005. Habitat suitability models and the shortfall in conservation planning for African vertebrates. Conservation Biology 19:1488–1497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. K., B. R. Noon, and E. C. Meslow. 1997. Biological corridors: form, function, and efficacy. BioScience 47:677–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. A., and R. J. Hobbs (eds) 1991. The role of corridors. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, New South Wales, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules. 1995. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. In: D. Ehrenfeld (ed) Readings in conservation biology: the landscape perspective. Blackwell Science, Cambridge, MA pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D’Erchia, T. C. Edwards, Jr., J. Ulliman, and R. G. Wright.1993. Gap analysis: a geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Wildlife Monographs 123

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, H. L., and J. B. Hestbeck. 1995. National biotic resource inventories and GAP analysis. BioScience 45:535–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1986. Design of nature reserves. In: M. B. Usher (ed) Wildlife conservation evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 315–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. 1988. The contribution of population and community biology to conservation science. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 19:473–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. S., J. A. Farr, J. Cox, and D. W. Mehlman. 1992. Movement corridors: conservation bargains or poor investments. Conservation Biology 6:493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E. 1991. Land use planning and wildlife maintenance: guidelines for conserving wildlife in an urban landscape. Journal of the American Planning Association 57:313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulé, M. E., and D. Simberloff. 1986. What do genetics and ecology tell us about the design of nature reserves? Biological Conservation 35:19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturtevant, B. R., E. J. Gustafson, and H. S. He. 2004. Modeling disturbance and succession in forest landscapes using LANDIS: introduction. Ecological Modeling 180–1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, O. L., and C. D. Thomas. 1996. Open corridors appear to facilitate dispersal by Ringlet Butterflies (Aphantopus hyperantus) between woodland clearings. Conservation Biology 10:1359–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S. A. 1986. Predicting impacts of habitat fragmentation on forest birds: a comparison of two models. In: J. Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph (eds) Wildlife 2000: modeling habitat relationships of terrestrial vertebrates. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, pp 301–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Temple, S. A., and J. R. Cary. 1988. Modeling dynamics of habitat-interior bird populations in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 2:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L. Prioritizing reserves for conservation. 2002. In: S. E. Gergel and M. G. Turner (eds) Learning landscape ecology: a practical guide to concepts and techniques. Springer, New York, pp 293–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, D. L., and D. O. Wallin. 2002. Introduction to Markov models. In: S. E. Gergel and M. G. Turner (eds) Learning landscape ecology: a practical guide to concepts and techniques. Springer, New York, pp 35–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, M. B. 1992. Statistical models of succession. In: D. C. Glenn-Lewin, R. K. Peet, and T. T. Veblen (eds) Plant succession: theory and prediction. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 215–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, F. 2003. Conservation biology: foundations, concepts, applications. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, F., and W. C. Klein. 1996. Response of elk to installation of oil wells. Journal of Mammalogy 77:1028–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, F., B. L. Probert, and G. M. Van Beek. 1995. Seasonal habitat characteristics of moose in south-central Montana. Alces 31:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos, C. C., H. Baveco, and C. J. Grashof-Bokdam. 2002. Corridors and species dispersal. In: K. J. Gutzwiller (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological cnservation. Springer, New York, pp 84–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, J., and G. Merriam. 1990. Use of spatial elements in a farmland mosaic by a woodland rodent. Biological Conservation 54:263–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove, D. S. 1985. Nest predation in forest tracts and the decline of migratory songbirds. Ecology 66:1211–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • With, K. A. 2002a. Using percolation theory to assess landscape connectivity and effects of habitat fragmentation. In: K. J. Gutzwiller (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, New York, pp 105–130

    Google Scholar 

  • With, K. A. 2002b. Landscape connectivity and metapopulation dynamics. In: S. E. Gergel and M. G. Turner (eds) Learning landscape ecology: a practical guide to concepts and techniques. Springer, New York, pp 208–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. G., J. G. MacCracken, and J. Hall. 1994. An ecological evaluation of proposed new conservation areas in Idaho: evaluating proposed Idaho national parks. Conservation Biology 8:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahner, R. H. 1988. Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conservation Biology 2:333–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, J. J., and J. M. Peek. 1992. Habitat selection by female Sitka black-tailed deer in logged forests of southeastern Alaska. Journal of Wildlife Management 53:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, D., and J. Chen. 2000. Edge effects in fragmented landscapes: a generic model for delineating area of edge influences (D-AEI). Ecological Modeling 132:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). The Conservation of Habitat and Landscape. In: Conservation Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6891-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics