On the Novelty of Nanotechnology: A Philosophical Essay
Nanotechnology has from its very beginning been surrounded with an aura of novelty that calls for a philosophical analysis. In order to do so, I first try to clarify the different meanings of the concept of novelty. This helps us understand that many paradoxes and fallacies dominate ordinary discourses on novelty, which any serious approach needs to avoid. Equipped with these conceptual clarifications, I discuss novelty first in science and engineering in general and point out the unique role that novelty plays in these areas. Then I discuss the novelty of nanotechnology by distinguishing between different levels and aspects of nanotechnology. The results allow reassessing public novelty claims about nanotechnology not only from an epistemological but also from ethical and political perspectives. I conclude with some remarks on the politics of producing and claiming novelty.
KeywordsScience Policy News Medium Scientific Revolution National Nanotechnology Initiative Ordinary Discourse
- Allendorf, M. 1998. From Bunsen to VLSI: 150 years of growth in chemical vapor deposition technology. Interface (The Electrochemical Society) 7(1): 36–39. http://www.electrochem.org/dl/interface/spr/spr98/IF3-98-Pages36-39.pdf.
- Baird, D., and A. Shew. 2004. Probing the history of scanning tunneling microscopy. In Discovering the nanoscale, ed. D. Baird, A. Nordmann, and J. Schummer, 145–156. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Bauer, H.H. 2002. ‘Pathological science’ is not scientific misconduct (nor is it pathological). Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 8: 5–20.Google Scholar
- Bensaude-Vincent, B. 1998. Eloge du mixte. Paris: Hachette.Google Scholar
- Ede, A. 2007. The rise and decline of colloid science in North America, 1900–1935. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
- Furukawa, Y. 1998. Inventing polymer science. Philadelphia: Chemical Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Lehn, J.-M. 1992. ‘Supramolecular chemistry – Scope and perspectives: Molecules – Supramolecules – Molecular devices’ (Nobel Lecture 1987). In Nobel lectures, chemistry 1981–1990, ed. T. Frängsmyr and B.G. Malmström, 444–491. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Mody, C.C.M. 2004. How probe microscopists became nanotechnologists. In Discovering the nanoscale, ed. D. Baird, A. Nordmann, and J. Schummer, 119–133. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
- Nordmann, A. 2006. Unsichtbare Ursprünge – Herbert Gleiter und der Beitrag der Materialwissenschaft. In Nanotechnologien im Kontext – Philosophische, ethische und gesellschaftliche Perspektiven, ed. A. Nordmann, J. Schummer, and A. Schwarz, 81–96. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
- NSTC/IWGN (National Science and Technology Council, Interagency Working Group on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology). 1999. Nanotechnology research directions: Vision for nanotechnology R&D in the next decade. Washington, DC: National Science and Technology Council.Google Scholar
- Peyerimhoff, S.D. 2002. The development of computational chemistry in Germany. In Reviews in computational chemistry, vol. 18, ed. K.B. Lipkowitz and D.B. Boyd, 257–291. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.Google Scholar
- Roberts, G.G. (ed.). 1990. Langmuir-Blodgett films. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Roco, M.C., and W.S. Bainbridge (eds.). 2001. Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology. Arlington: National Science Foundation. http://www.wtec.org/loyola/nano/NSET.Societal.Implications/nanosi.pdf.
- Schummer, J. 2004. ‘Societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology’: Meanings, interest groups, and social dynamics. Techne – Research in Philosophy and Technology 8(2): 56–87.Google Scholar
- Schummer, J. 2009. Nanotechnologie: Spiele mit Grenzen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
- Sherman, J.D. 1999. Synthetic zeolites and other microporous oxide molecular sieves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(7): 3471–3478. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/96/7/3471.
- Szejtli, J. 1996. Historical background. In Comprehensive supramolecular chemistry, vol. 3 (‘Cyclodextrins’), ed. J.L. Atwood et al., 1–3. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar