Advertisement

In Pursuit of Nanoethics: An Introduction

  • Bert Gordijn
  • Anthony Mark Cutter
Chapter
Part of the The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology book series (ELTE, volume 10)

Abstract

This chapter is an introduction to the volume at hand. The book contributes to the ongoing nanoethics debate in four topical areas. The first part tackles questions of what could be called ‘meta-nanoethics’. Its focus lies on basic concepts and the issue of what – if anything – is truly novel and special about the new field of nanoethics or its subject matter. The second part of this volume presents a selection of interesting perspectives on some of the opportunities and challenges of nanotechnology. Part three takes a more in depth look at one of the most pressing current concerns: how to deal with the risks and uncertainties surrounding nanotechnology in a responsible manner. In its fourth and final part the volume touches on issues of public debate and policy.

Keywords

Public Debate Precautionary Principle Public Engagement National Nanotechnology Initiative Democratic Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Beyleveld, D., and R. Brownsword. 2012. Emerging technologies, extreme uncertainty, and the principle of rational precautionary reasoning. Law Innovation and Technology 4(1): 35–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brey, P.A.E. 2012. Anticipatory ethics for emerging technologies. NanoEthics 6: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collingridge, D. 1980. The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  4. Drexler, K.E. 1986. Engines of creation. The coming era of nanotechnology. New York: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. ETC. 2003. The Big Down: Technologies converging at the nano-scale. http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/TheBigDown.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  6. Gordijn, B. 2005. Nanoethics. From apocalyptic nightmares and utopian dreams towards a more balanced view. Science and Engineering Ethics 11(4): 521–533. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gordijn, B. 2006. Converging NBIC technologies for improving human performance: A critical assessment of the novelty and the prospects of the project. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 34(4): 726–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gordijn, B., R. De Vries, and D.P. O’Mathúna. 2011. Ethical issues in nanotechnology. In The SAGE handbook of health care ethics, ed. R. Chadwick, H.A.M.J. Ten Have, and E. Meslin, 402–412. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Greenpeace, Nanotechnology. 2004. www.greenpeace-org.uk. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  10. Joy, B. 2000. Why the future doesn’t need us. Wired. 8.04 http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  11. Lenk, Ch., and N. Biller-Andorno. 2007. Nanomedicine-emerging or re-emerging ethical issues? A discussion of four ethical themes. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10: 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lucivero, F., T. Swierstra, and M. Boenink. 2011. Assessing expectations: Towards a toolbox for an ethics of emerging technologies. NanoEthics 5: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moor, J.H. 2005. Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. Ethics and Information Technology 7(3): 111–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). 2007, December. Strategic plan. Prepared by the Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology; the Committee on Technology, and the National Science and Technology Council. http://www.nano.gov/NNI_Strategic_Plan_2007.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  15. Patenaude, J., G.A. Legault, J.-P. Béland, M. Parent, and P. Boissy. 2011. Moral arguments in the debate over nanotechnologies: Are we talking past each other? NanoEthics 5: 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. 1992. http://www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?DocumentID=78&ArticleID=1163. Accessed 11 Aug 2012.
  17. Roco, M.C. 2004. Science and technology integration for increased human potential and societal outcomes. In The coevolution of human potential and converging technologies, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1013, ed. M.C. Roco and C.D. Montemagno, 1–16. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  18. Roco, M.C., and W.S. Bainbridge. 2003. Overview. Converging technologies for improving human performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (NBIC). In NBIC convergence for improving human performance. Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science, ed. M.C. Roco and W.S. Bainbridge, 1–27. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rogers-Hayden, T., et al. 2007. Introduction: Engaging with nanotechnologies – Engaging differently? NanoEthics 1: 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schummer, J. 2006. Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 31(3): 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shrader-Frechette, K. 2007. Nanotoxicology and ethical conditions. NanoEthics 1: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taniguchi, N. 1974. On the basic concept of Nano-Technology. In Proceedings of international conference on production engineering, Part II, 18–23. 9. Tokyo: Japan Society of Precision Engineering.Google Scholar
  23. Weckert, J. 2007. Editorial. NanoEthics 1: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EthicsDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.University of Central LancashirePrestonUK

Personalised recommendations