From Thing to Relation. On Bateson's Bioanthropology

  • Jesper Hoffmeyer
Chapter
Part of the Biosemiotics book series (BSEM, volume 2)

The rapid increase in our technological mastering of more and more intimate and everyday aspects of life has created an acute sensitivity towards the huge lacunas left over by rational knowledge and technology. The present “turn towards the spiritual” has probably very much to do with such feelings of disturbance. From a Batesonean view the roots of these lacunae are to be found in fundamental epistemological errors in the preferred schemes of conceptualizations in western culture – a never decently surmounted dualism one might perhaps say. One central point here is the persistent reification of relation. Relations come in many kinds, but science invariably treats relations as dependent variables, dependent that is on things. Giving primacy to process and relation over things Bateson implicitly cleared the way for a semiotic kind of final causation, which however he would perhaps not himself have accepted, because his understanding of final causation implied an inversed – and totally contra factual – temporal ordering. The very systemic characteristics he found in aesthetics in natural systems seems however to point the way to other possibilities for understanding final causation. Possibilities which can be made fruitful in a biosemiotic reframing of technological challenges as well as in our feelings of belonging in a big “pattern that connects”.

Keywords

Relative being semiotic freedom intentionality semiotic causation emergence 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York, Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  2. Bateson, Gregory (1979). Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity. New York, Bentam Books.Google Scholar
  3. Bateson, Gregory and Mary Catherine Bateson (1987). Angels Fear. Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, Terrence (forthcoming). “Minimal Conditions for Natural Selection: How Selection Dynamics can Emerge from the Linkage of Autocatalysis and Molecular Self-Assembly.” In preparation.Google Scholar
  5. Deely, John (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deely, John (1994). “How does Semiosis Effect Renvoi?” The American Journal of Semiotics 11(1/2): 11–61.Google Scholar
  7. Deely, John (2001). Four Ages of Understanding. The First Postmodern Survey of Philosophy from Ancient Times to the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Toronto, Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Harries-Jones, Peter (1995). Ecological Understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto, Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1996). Signs of Meaning in the Universe. Bloomington, IN, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1997). The Global Semiosphere. Semiotics Around the World. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International Association for Semiotic Studies, Berkeley 1994, Berlin/New York, Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  11. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1998). “Surfaces inside Surfaces. On the Origin of Agency and Life.” Cybernetics & Human Knowing 5(1): 33–42.Google Scholar
  12. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (1999). “Order out of Indeterminacy.” Semiotica 127 (Biosemiotica II, Special issue on Biosemiotics edited by Jesper Hoffmeyer and Claus Emmeche): 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2001). “Life and Reference.” BioSystems. Special Issue (Guest edited by Luis Mateus Rocha): The Physics and Evolution of Symbols and Codes:Reflections on the Work of Howard Pattee. BioSystems 60(1/3): 123–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoffmeyer, Jesper (2006). Uexküllian Planmässigkeit. Sign Systems Studies 32: 73–97.Google Scholar
  15. Hoffmeyer, Jesper and Claus Emmeche (1991). “Code-Duality and the Semiotics of Nature”. In Code-Duality and the Semiotics of Nature. M. Anderson and F. Merrell. New York, Mouton de Gruyter: 117–166.Google Scholar
  16. Johnstone, Rufus A. (1997). “The Evolution of Animal Signals”. In The Evolution of Animal Signals. J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies. Oxford, Blackwell: 155–178.Google Scholar
  17. Jung, Carl Gustav (1967 (1916)). Septem Sermones ad Mortuos. London, JM Watkins.Google Scholar
  18. Kauffman, Stuart A. (1993). Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York/Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kauffman, Stuart A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lettvin, J., H. Maturana, et al. (1959). “What the frog’s eye tells the frog’s brain.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of US 47: 1940–51.Google Scholar
  21. Nagel, Thomas (1986). The View from Nowhere. Oxford/New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pattee, Howard H. (1977). “Dynamic and Linguistic Modes of Complex Systems.” International Journal for General Systems 3: 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Russel, Bertrand and Alfred N. Whitehead (1910–13). Principia Mathematica, vol. I–III. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  24. Salthe, Stanley (1993). Development and Evolution. Complexity and Change in Biology. Cambridge, Mass./London, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sebeok, Thomas A. (1979). The Sign & Its Masters, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  26. Short, T. L. (2002). “Darwin’s Concept of Final Cause: Neither New Nor Trivial.” Biology and Philosophy 17: 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sjölander, Sverre (1995). “Some Cognitive Breakthroughs in the Evolution of Cognition and Consciousness and their Impact on the Biology of Language.” Evolution and Cognition 1(1): 3–11.Google Scholar
  28. Sober, Elliot (1984). The Nature of Selection. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ulanowicz, Robert E. (2002). “Ecology, a Dialog between the Quick and the Dead.” Emergence 4(1/2): 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Von Neumann, John (1966). Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. Urbana, IL., University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  31. Weber, Bruce (1998). “Emergence of Life and Biological Selection from the Perspective of Complex Systems Dynamics.” In Emergence of Life and Biological Selection from the Perspective of Complex Systems Dynamics. G. v. d. Vijver, S. Salthe and M. Delpos. Dordrecht, Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesper Hoffmeyer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Molecular BiologyUniversity of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations