Deciding on Ethical Issues in Engineering Design

  • Anke Van Gorp
  • Ibo Van de Poel

Engineers make decisions concerning ethical issues like safety and sustainability in design processes. We argue that the way in which engineers deal with such ethical issues depends on the kind of design process they carry out. Vincenti distinguishes between normal and radical design. In normal design processes the operational principle and normal configuration are given, in radical design processes they are not given. We present four case-studies of actual design processes: two processes of normal design and two of radical design. We show that in the normal design processes, engineers use what we call regulative frameworks to make ethical decisions. Regulative frameworks consist of legislation and technical standards, and interpretations thereof by certifying organizations. Operationalizations of ethical criteria are given in these regulative frameworks. Regulative frameworks also define some minimal requirements on safety and sustainability that the product should meet. In the radical design processes, such frameworks are absent or difficult to apply. Morally warranted trust in engineers can therefore not be based on regulative frameworks in the case of radical design; for radical design a different basis is needed on which to base such trust.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arbeidsomstandighedenbesluit, 2004, SdU Uitgevers, The Hague.Google Scholar
  2. European Committee, 1999, Guide to the implementation of directives based on New Approach and Global Approach, Brussels.Google Scholar
  3. Grunwald, A., 2000, Against over-estimating the role of ethics in technology development, Sci. Eng. Eth. 6(2):181-196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grunwald, A., 2001, The application of ethics to engineering and the engineer’s moral responsibility: perspectives for a research agenda, Sci. Eng. Eth. 7(3):415-428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hunter, Th. A.,1997, Designing to Codes and Standards, in: ASM Handbook, G.E. Dieter and S. Lampman, eds., pp. 66-71.Google Scholar
  6. Polanyi, M., 1962, Personal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  7. Van de Poel, I. R., 2001, Investigating ethical issues in engineering design, Sci. Eng. Eth. 7(3):429-446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Van de Poel, I. R., and Van Gorp, A. C., 2006, The need for ethical reflection in engineering design; the relevance of type of design and design hierarchy, Sci. Technol. Hum. Valu. 31 (3):333-360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Van der Burg, S., and Van Gorp, A., 2005, Understanding moral responsibility in the design of trailers, Sci. Eng. Eth. 11(2):235-256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van Gorp, A., and Van de Poel, I., 2001, Ethical considerations in engineering design processes, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 21(3):15-22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Gorp, A. C., 2005, Ethical Issues in Engineering Design; Safety and Sustainability, Simon Stevin Series in the Philosophy of Technology, Delft.Google Scholar
  12. Vincenti, W. G., 1990, What Engineers Know and How They Know It, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London.Google Scholar
  13. Vincenti, W. G., 1992, Engineering knowledge, type of design, and level of hierarchy: further thoughts about what engineers know …, in: Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age, P. Kroes and M. Bakker, eds., Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 17-34.Google Scholar
  14. World Commission on Environment and Development [WCED], 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anke Van Gorp
  • Ibo Van de Poel
    • 1
  1. 1.Delft University of TechnologyNetherlands

Personalised recommendations