Technological Design as an Evolutionary Process

  • Philip Brey

The evolution of technical artifacts is often seen as radically different from the evolution of biological species. Technical artifacts are normally understood to result from the purposive intelligence of designers whereas biological species and organisms are held to have resulted from evolution by natural selection. But could it be that technology, too, is really the outcome of evolutionary processes rather than intelligent design? Recent decades have seen the emergence of evolutionary theories of technology, which use concepts and principles drawn from evolutionary biology to describe and explain processes of technological innovation and technological change. In this chapter, I will focus on three prominent theories, by George Basalla, Joel Mokyr and Robert Aunger, and I will investigate to what extent these theories present a truly evolutionary account of technological innovation and change. In the end, I aim to analyze how these theories construe technological design: as a blind evolutionary process, a purposive activity of designers, or a mixture of both.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andersen, E., ed., 1994, Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions, Pinter Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  2. Aunger, R., 2002, The Electric Meme, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Aunger, R., ed., 2000, Darwinizing Culture. The Status of Memetics as a Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Basalla, G., 1988, The Evolution of Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Bijker, W., Pinch, T., and Hughes, T., eds., 1987, The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. Blackmore, S., 1999, The Meme Machine, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Callebaut, W., and Pinxten, R., eds., 1987, Evolutionary Epistemology: A Multiparadigm Program, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  8. Cziko, G., 1995, Without Miracles: Universal Selection Theory and the Second Darwinian Revolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Darwin, C., 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, Murray, London.Google Scholar
  10. Dawkins, R., 1976, The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  11. Dawkins, R., 1986, The Blind Watchmaker, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Dembsky, W. (1999). Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology, InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove.Google Scholar
  13. Dennett, D., 1995, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life, Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Dopfer, K., ed., 2005, The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. Hahlweg, K., and Hooker, C., eds., 1989, Issues in Evolutionary Epistemology, SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Haugeland, J., 1981, The nature and plausibility of cognitivism, in: Mind Design, J. Haugeland, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 243-281.Google Scholar
  17. Little, D., 1991, Varieties of Social Explanation, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  18. Mokyr, J., 1996, Evolution and technological change: a new metaphor for economic history, in: Technological Change, R. Fox, ed., Harwood Publishers, London.Google Scholar
  19. Mokyr, J., 1998, Induced technical innovation and medical history: an evolutionary approach, J. Evol. Econ. 8:119-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mokyr, J., 1999, Invention and rebellion: why do innovations occur at all? an evolutionary approach, in: Minorities and Economic Growth, E. Brezis and P. Temin, eds., Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 179-203.Google Scholar
  21. Mokyr, J., 2000a, Innovation and selection in evolutionary models of technology: some defini-tional issues, in: Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, J. Ziman, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Mokyr, J., 2000b, Knowledge, technology, and economic growth during the industrial revolution, in: Productivity, Technology and Economic Growth, B. Van Ark, S. Kuipers, and G. Kuper, eds., Kluwer/Springer, The Hague.Google Scholar
  23. Paley, W., 1802, Natural theology: Or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature, J. Faulder, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ziman, J., ed., 2000, Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Brey
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TwenteNetherlands

Personalised recommendations