The Designer Fallacy and Technological Imagination

  • Don Ihde

Most literary critics have abandoned the notion that the meaning of a text lies in the intention of the author and have called this the “intentional fallacy.” I hold that there is a parallel found in many interpretations of technology design and call it the “designer fallacy.” This chapter, through examining a wide series of historical technology designs, deconstructs the utility of a simple designer-plastic material-ultimate use model and suggests that one must take into account unintended uses and consequences, the constraints and potentials of materiality, and cultural contexts, which often are complex and multistable. I outline a complex, interactive account of design interpretation.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeLanda, M., 1991, War in the Age of Intelligent Machines, Swerve Editions, Zone Press, New York, pp. 12-14.Google Scholar
  2. Kittler, F., 1990, The mechanized philosopher, in: Looking after Nietzsche, L. A. Rickels, ed., SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  3. Latour, B., 1987, Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Nyre, L., 2003, Fidelity Matters: Sound Media and Realism in the 20th Century, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Media Studies, University of Bergen, Volda University College, Norway.Google Scholar
  5. Pickering, A., 1995, The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p. 102.Google Scholar
  6. Tenner, E., 1996, Why things Bite Back: Technology and the Revenge of Unintended Consequences, Alfred Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Toffler, A., 1970, Future Shock, Bantam, New York.Google Scholar
  8. White, Jr., L., 1971, Cultural climates and technological advance in the Middle Ages, Viator 2:171-201.Google Scholar
  9. Winner, L., 1986, Do artifacts have politics?, in: The Whale and the Reactor, L. Winner, ed., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 19-39.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Don Ihde
    • 1
  1. 1.Stony Brook UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations