Thinking about the Thinking about Self-Study: An Analysis of Eight Chapters

  • Robert V BulloughJr
  • Stefinee E Pinnegar
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE, volume 12)

Abstract

This chapter has specifically been written to Offer the perspective of critical friends on the issues raised in the first section of this Handbook. As a crucial aspect of self-study, there is an ongoing need to mOffe beyond oneself and to grasp alternative viewpoints on situations. Attending to alternative perspectives is important in self-study so that the development of ideas and actions and, the resultant learning, might be informed by careful consideration of perspectives beyond the self in line with the ideas of framing and reframing described by Schön (1983, 1987). However, framing and refram-ing is itself problematic and this chapter explores how, through a careful analysis of the first eight chapters of the Handbook, critical friends are able to question and critique the work of others in meaningful ways. This chapter is illustrative of the underlying approach to self-study whereby honest and professional critique is sought to enhance learning and to better inform the subsequent claims derived from such learning.

Keywords

Teacher Education Preservice Teacher Moral Obligation Teacher Education Program Public Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arizona Group (2002, April). Critique of the political, social, and practical context of restructuring and reform in teacher education: Narratives of four teacher educators. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association New Orleans.Google Scholar
  2. Arizona Group (2004). Professional Dialogue in Self-study. In John Loughran, MaryLynn Hamilton, Vicki LaBoskey & Tom Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 1109–1167). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, T., with Caldwell, P., Gaborik, B., Grubis, H., Kaltenbach, S., Karns, C., Keep-Barnes, A., McCracken, J., Staph-Harris, K., & Smith, B. (1999). Gretel and Hansel, research in the woods: An Alaskan fairytale in four acts. In John Loughran (Ed.), Researching teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 111–131). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bereiter, C. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open CourtGoogle Scholar
  6. Buber, M. (1970). I and T hou. Translation by Walter Kaufmann. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  7. Bullough, R. V. (Jr.) & Gitlin, A. (1995). Becoming a student of teaching: methodologies for exploring self and school context. New York: GarlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullough, R. V. Jr. & Gitlin, A. D. (2001). Becoming a student of teaching: linking knowledge production and practice (2nd Edition). London: Routledge-Falmer.Google Scholar
  9. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2004). The nature of teaching and learning in self-study. In John Loughran, MaryLynn Hamilton, Vicki LaBoskey & Tom Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 41–67). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole, A. L., & Finley, S. (Eds.) (1998). Conversations in community. Proceedings of the second International Conference of the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England. Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  12. Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  13. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Fenstermacher, G. D. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 37–49). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  15. Fernandez, K., & Mitchell, J. (2002). Choices and voices: Students take control of their writing. In J. Loughran, I. Mitchell, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Learning from teacher research (pp. 21–36). NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Glass, J. M. (1993). Shattered selves: Multiple personality in a postmodern world. Itaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Guilfoyle, K., Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (1997). Obligations to unseen children. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion and pedagogy in teacher education (183–209). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  19. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolutions of society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  21. James, W. (1907) Pragmatism. New York: LongmanGoogle Scholar
  22. Kosnik, C., Freese, A., & Samaras, A. (Eds.) (2002). Making a Difference in teacher education through self-study. Proceedings of the Fourth International conference on Self-study of Teacher Education Practices, Herstmonceux, East Sussex, England. Toronto, Ontario: OISE, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  23. Kuzmick, J. J. (2002). Research as a way of knowing and seeing: advocacy for the other. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 222–235). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  24. Lather, P. A. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Levinas, E. (1969). Totality and infinity. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lighthall, F. F. (2004). Fundamental features and approaches of the s-step enterprise.. In John Loughran, MaryLynn Hamilton, Vicki LaBoskey & Tom Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 193–244). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loughran, J. J. (2004a). A history and context of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. In John Loughran, MaryLynn Hamilton, Vicki LaBoskey & Tom Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 7–39). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loughran, J. J. (2004). Learning through self-study: The influence of purpose, participants and context. In John Loughran, MaryLynn Hamilton, Vicki LaBoskey & Tom Russell (Eds.), International Handbook of Self-study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices (pp. 151–192).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loughran, J. J., & Northfield, J. R. (1996). Opening the classroom door: Teacher, researcher, learner. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Loughran, J. J., & Northfield, J. R. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In MaryLynn Hamilton et al. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: self-study in teacher education (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  31. Loughran, J. J., & Russell, T. L. (Eds.) (2000). Exploring myths and legends of teacher education. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England. Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  32. Louie, B. Y., Stackman, R. W., Drevdahl, D., & Purdy, J. M. (2002). Exploring myths in teacher education. In John Loughran & Tom Russell (Eds.), ImprOffing teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 193–207). London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  33. McElroy-Johnson, B. (1993). Giving voice to the voiceless. Harvard Educational Review, 63(1), 85–104.Google Scholar
  34. Nias, J. (1989). Primary teachers talking: A study of teaching as work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  36. Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Pereira, P. (2000). Reconstructing oneself as a learner of mathematics. In J. Loughran. & T. Russell (Eds.), Exploring myths and legends of teacher education. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Self Study of Teacher Education Practices (pp. 204–207). Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England. Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  38. Richards, J., & Russell, T. (Eds.) (1996). Empowering our future in teacher education. Proceedings of the First International Conference of the Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, Herstmonceux Castle, East Sussex, England. Kingston, Ontario: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  39. Schulte, A. (2001). Student teachers in transformation: A self-study of a supervisor’s practice. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  40. Stewart, D. C. (1992). Cognitive psychologists, social constructionists, and three nineteenth century advocates of authentic voice. Journal of Advanced Composition, 12(2), 279–290.Google Scholar
  41. Tolman, E. C. (1951). Behavior and psychological man: Essays in motivation and learning. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert V BulloughJr
    • 1
  • Stefinee E Pinnegar
    • 2
  1. 1.Brigham Young UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Brigham Young UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations