Advertisement

Developing Complex Mental Models in Biology Through Model Evolution

  • M.C. Núñez-Oveido
  • John Clement
  • Mary Anne Rea-Ramirez
Part of the Models and Modeling in Science Education book series (MMSE, volume 2)

Keywords

Mental Model Conceptual Change Micro Model Target Concept Corn Syrup 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clement, J. (1989). Learning via model construction and criticism. In G. Glover, R. Ronning, & C Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Assessment, theory and research. (pp 341–381). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  2. Clement, J. (2000). Analysis of clinical interviews: Foundations and model viability. In A. E. Kelly, & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in mathematics and science education. (pp. 547–589 Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Clement, J., & Steinberg, M. (2002). Step-wise evolution of mental models of electric circuits: a “learning aloud” case study. Journal of the Learning Sciences 11, 389–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clement, J., (2008). Creative model construction in scientists and students: Imagery, analogy, and mental simulation. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Darden, L. (Ed.) (1996), PSA 1996, Proceedings of the 1996 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, Part I: Contributed Papers, Philosophy of Science, Supplement to Vol. 63.Google Scholar
  6. Duschl, R. A., & Ellenbogen K. (1999). Middle school science students’ dialogic argumentation. In M. Komorek, H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graeber, & A. Kross (Eds.), Research in science education – past, present, and future (Vol 2, pp. 420–422) Kiel, IPN Kiel.Google Scholar
  7. Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72.Google Scholar
  8. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. I. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  9. atano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan(pp. 262–272). New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Kelly, G. J., Druker, S., & Chen, C. (1998). Students’ reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education 20, 849–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nersessian, N. J. (1992a). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science. (pp. 3–44), Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Nersessian, N. J. (1992b). In the theoretician’s laboratory: thought experimenting as mental modeling. Philosophy of Science Association 2, 291–301.Google Scholar
  13. Nersessian, N. J. (1995). Should physicists preach what they practice? Constructive modeling in doing and learning physics. Science & Education 4,203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nunez-Oviedo, M. C. (2003). Teacher-student co-construction processes in biology: strategies for developing mental models in large group discussions. Doctoral Dissertation University of Massachusetts at Amherst MA.Google Scholar
  15. Nunez-Oviedo, M. C., Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Clement, J., & Else, M. J. (2002). Teacher-student co-construction in middle school life science. Proceedings of the AETS Conference.Google Scholar
  16. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2001). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review 82: 63–70.Google Scholar
  17. Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (1998). Models of conceptual understanding in human respiration and strategies for instruction. DAI - 9909208, Amherst: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  18. Rea-Ramirez, M. A. (2005). Using imagery to facilitate reasoning with a model. Paper presented at AERA. Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Rea-Ramirez, M. A., Nunez-Oviedo, M. C., Clement, J., & Else, M. J. (2004). Energy in the human body curriculum. National Science Foundation. University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  20. Rea-Ramirez, M. and Clement, J. (1998). In search of dissonance: The evolution of dissonance in conceptual change theory, Proceedings of National Association for Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  21. Resnick, L., Salmon, M., Seitz, C. M., Wathen S. H., & Holowchak, M. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Cognition & Instruction 11, 347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scott, P. H. (1992). Pathways in learning science: A case study of the development of one student’s ideas relating to the structure of matter. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg & H Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies. Proceedings of an International Workshop held at the University of Bremen (pp. 203–224). Kiel,Germany: IPN/Institute for Science Education.Google Scholar
  23. Toulmin, S. (1972). Human understanding: an inquiry into the aims of science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M.C. Núñez-Oveido
    • 1
  • John Clement
    • 2
  • Mary Anne Rea-Ramirez
    • 3
  1. 1.Universidad de ConceptionEdmundo Larenas 335 ConcepcionChile
  2. 2.University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA 01003
  3. 3.Western Governors UniversitySalt Lake CityUT

Personalised recommendations