Joint Simulation of Mine Spoil Uncertainty for Rehabilitation Decision Making

  • R. Dimitrakopoulos
  • S. Mackie
Part of the Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics book series (QGAG, volume 15)


Soil attributes, including those in mine spoil heaps, critically affect plant growth during land rehabilitation. Their characterization through a limited number of samples requires quantification of spatial variability, which is then used at various stages throughout the rehabilitation process and assists risk analysis and rehabilitation decision making. Stochastic simulation is a tool used for the quantification of uncertainty. This paper presents the suitability of stochastic simulation for the joint simulation of soil attributes and a computationally efficient method based on: (i) the Minimum/Maximum Autocorrelation Factors (MAF), involving the de-correlation of pertinent variables into spatially non-correlated factors, and (ii) the simulation of MAF and back transformation to the conditional simulations of the correlated variables. MAF factors in point (ii) are simulated using the new generalized sequential Gaussian simulation technique which is substantially more efficient than the traditional sequential simulation methods. The formulated approach is applied to mine spoil data, specifically electrical conductivity and pH, which typically contribute to restricted plant growth on spoils in coal mines. The results of the simulations are used to quantify the risk of exceeding significant thresholds for each variable, thereby identifying problem rehabilitation areas. The case study demonstrates the practical aspects of the method, as well as its use in planning rehabilitation strategies and predictions of future performance of the rehabilitation.


Waste Dump Mine Spoil Conditional Simulation Math Geol Sequential Gaussian Simulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bross MJ, Aarts L, van Tooren CF, Stein A (1999) Quantification of the effects of spatially varying environmental contaminants into a cost model for soil remediation. J Environ Manage 56: 133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benndorf J (2005) Efficient sequential simulation methods with implications to long-term production scheduling. MPhil thesis, University of Queensland, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  3. David M (1988) Handbook of applied advanced geostatistical ore reserve estimation. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Davis MW (1987) Generating large stochastic simulation – The matrix polynomial approximation method. Math Geol 19:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desbarats AJ, Dimitrakopoulos R (2000) Geostatisical simulation of regionalized pore-size distributions using min/max autocorrelation factors. Math Geol 32:919–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dimitrakopoulos R, Luo X (2004) Generalized sequential Gaussian simulation on group size ν and screen-effect approximations for large field simulations. Math Geol 36:567–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goovaerts P (2001) Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma, 103:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grigg AH, Shelton M, Mullen B (2000) The nature and management of rehabilitation pastures on open-cut coal mines in central Queensland. Tropical Grasslands 34:242–250Google Scholar
  9. Grigg AH, Emmerton BR, McCallum NJ (2001) The development of draft completion criteria for ungrazed rehabilitation pastures after open-cut coal mining in central Queensland. Final Report ACARP Project C8038, Centre for Mined Land Rehabilitation, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutjahr A, Bullard B, Hatch S (1997) General joint conditional simulations using a fast Fourier transform method. Math Geol 29:361–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morrey DR (1999) Principles of economic mine closure, reclamation and cost management – Remediation and management of degraded lands. Lewis Publishers, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  12. Pachepsky Y, Acock B (1998) Stochastic imaging of soil parameters to assess variability and uncertainty of crop yield estimates. Geoderma 85:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wackernagel HJ (1995) Multivariate geostatistics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  14. Webster R, Oliver MA (1989) Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties: VI. Disjunctive kriging and mapping the conditional probability. J Soil Sci 40:497–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Dimitrakopoulos
    • 1
  • S. Mackie
  1. 1.Department of Mining and Materials EngineeringMcGill UniversityMontreal QcCanada H3A 2A7

Personalised recommendations