Advertisement

Mental Ownership and Participation for Innovation in Environmental Education and Education for Sustainable Development

  • Søren Breiting

What specific qualities make participation genuine, and how do they link with a democratic view of education, cooperation, and empowerment? This chapter explores these themes, linking reflections on existing theoretical perspectives on the ‘ownership of participation’ with professional experience on educational development initiatives in a number of countries around the world (mainly Thailand, Namibia, and Denmark). In particular, the chapter argues that while the process of developing ‘mental ownership’ is a neglected aspect of successful participatory approaches in development efforts as well as in education, there is good reason to consider the hypothesis that the level of mental ownership that a participatory initiative is able to generate among participants, corresponds with the experienced quality of the participatory approach. In so doing, the chapter discusses the potential value of generating mental ownership in participation for improving the quality of different approaches to innovation in education, and illustrates wider debates on the need to democratise environmental education and Education for Sustainable Development (ESD), and whether educational goals should be principally regarded as addressing adaptation or emancipation (e.g. Hellesnes 1982).

Keywords mental ownership, psychological ownership, environmental education, action-competence models

Keywords

Environmental Education Participatory Approach Action Researcher Head Teacher Reflective Practitioner 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Institutes for Research (2000) Participation as a Method to Improve Education Quality: The Principles. Improving Educational Quality. Arlington, VA: US Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
  2. Breiting, S. (1996) Is there anything special about environmental education in the Nordic region? Conflicting Interests in the Use of Natural Resources–A Nordic School Developmental Project on Environmental Education, Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordic Publishing House, 519: 13–17.Google Scholar
  3. Breiting, S. and Janniche, P.M. (1995) MUVIN-DK. Background Information for Schools in Denmark Participating in Nordic Environmental Education in 1994–96. Copenhagen: The Ministry of Education and The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.Google Scholar
  4. Breiting, S., Hedegaard, K., Mogensen, F., Nielsen, K., and Schnack K. (1999) Handlekompetence, interessekonflikter og miljøundervisning - MUVIN-projektet. Odense: Odense Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
  5. Breiting, S., Imene, S.N., and Macfarlane, I. (1997) Life Science Project. Midterm Review. Windhoek: Ministry of Basic Education and Culture, Namibia & Ibis.Google Scholar
  6. Burns, M. (1994) Off the shelf: how to ensure that your strategic plan becomes a valued tool lessons learned. National Endowment for the Arts. (http://www.nea.gov/resources/Lessons/BURNS.HTML)
  7. Christensen, C.U. (ed) (1994) Environmental and school initiatives ENSI–phase 2. The Danish report to OECD. Proceedings from the Research Centre for Environmental and Health Education. 22. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish School of Educational Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Clift, S. and Jensen, B.B. (eds) (2005) The Health Promoting School: International Advances in Theory, Evaluation and Practice. Copenhagen: Danish University of Education Press.Google Scholar
  9. Danida (2002) Strengthening Environmental Education in Thailand. Revised Project Document. Bangkok: Danida, Royal Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Danida Ref No. 104.Thai.1. MFS.42.Google Scholar
  10. Gross, P.A. (1997) Joint Curriculum Design: Facilitating Learner Ownership and Active Participation in Secondary Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Hart, R. (1992) Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship (Innocenti Essay No. 4). Florence: UNICEF ICDC.Google Scholar
  12. Hellesnes, J. (1982) Education and the concept of critique. In: Bredo, E. and Feinberg, W. (eds), Knowledge and Values in Social and Educational Research. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 355–68.Google Scholar
  13. The Heritage Foundation (2005) Education Notebook: Taking Ownership of Education. (http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/EdNotes6.cfm).
  14. Jensen, B.B. and Schnack K. (1997) The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3, 2: 163–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, B.B. (2004) Environmental and health education viewed from an action-oriented perspective: a case from Denmark. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 4: 405–425.Google Scholar
  16. Kelly, U. (2003) Beyond ‘The Tyranny of Safety’: Reflections on a Potential Alternative. Paper prepared for the Conference ‘Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation?’, Manchester, 27/28 February 2003. (http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/idpm/research/events/participation03/Buhler-Kelly.doc).
  17. Kindered, J. (2005) Possessive Expression at work: “Those Machines are Mine”, Unpublished doctoral thesis, City University of New York.Google Scholar
  18. Lawson, M. (ed.) (2004) From Donorship to Ownership? Moving Towards PRSP. Round Two. Oxfam Briefing Paper 51. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  19. Mattessich, P.W. and Monsey, B.R. (1992) Collaboration: What Makes it Work–A Review of Literature on Factors Influencing Successful Collaboration. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation, pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
  20. Ministry of Education (2004) Case Study. Experiences from Environmental Education Strengthening Environmental Education in Thailand (SEET). Inspiration and Guidance for Thai Schools. Ministry of Education. Bangkok.Google Scholar
  21. Pierce, J.L., Kostova, T., and Dirks, K.T. (2003) The state of psychological ownership: integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7, 1: 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Suwannaketnikom, S. et al. (2004) Action Research on Environmental Education Experience for Reflective Practitioner Development. Strengthening Environmental Education in Thailand (SEET). 5 volumes. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University and Ministry of Education (In Thai).Google Scholar
  24. United Nations (1993) Earth Summit. Agenda 21. The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. New York: United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  25. UNESCO (1976) The Belgrade Charter: a global framework for environmental education. Connect, UNESCO-UNEP Environmental Education Newsletter, 1, 1, 1–2.Google Scholar
  26. UNESCO (1992) The Tbilisi Declaration: Final Report Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education. Organized by UNESCO in Cooperation with UNEP, Tbilisi, USSR, 14–26 October 1977, Paris: UNESCO ED/MD/49. UN.Google Scholar
  27. UNESCO (2005) UN Decade for Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014). (http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=23279&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html).
  28. Uzzell, D., Davallon, D.J., Fontes, P.J., Gottesdiener, H., Jensen, B.B., Kofoed, J., Uhrenholdt, J.G., and Vognsen, C. (1997) Children as Catalysts of Environmental Change. In collaboration with Instituto de Promoçao Ambiental, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  29. Wagner, S.H., Parker, C.P., and Christiansen, N.D. (2003) Employees that think and act like owners: effects of ownership beliefs and behaviors on organizational effectiveness, Personnel Psychology, 56, 4: 847–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Søren Breiting
    • 1
  1. 1.Danish School of EducationUniversity of AarhusCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations