Handbook of Philosophical Logic pp 95-126

Part of the Handbook of Philosophical Logic book series (HALO, volume 14)


  • Jon Williamson

Perhaps the key philosophical questions concerning causality are the following: +what are causal relationships? how can one discover causal relationships? how should one reason with causal relationships? This chapter will focus on the first two questions.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [Bacon, 1620] Francis Bacon: ‘The New Organon’, Lisa Jardine and Michael Silverthorne (eds.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.Google Scholar
  2. [Benacerraf, 1973] Paul Benacerraf: ‘Mathematical truth’, in [Benacerraf and Putnam, 1983], pages 403-420.Google Scholar
  3. [Benacerraf and Putnam, 1983] Paul Benacerraf and Hilary Putnam (eds.): ‘Philosophy of mathematics: selected readings’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, second edition.Google Scholar
  4. [Cartwright, 1997] Nancy Cartwright: ‘What is a causal structure?’, in [McKim and Turner, 1997], pages 343-357.Google Scholar
  5. [Cartwright, 1999] Nancy Cartwright: ‘Causality: independence and determinism’, in [Gammerman, 1999], pages 51-63.Google Scholar
  6. [Cartwright, 2001] Nancy Cartwright: ‘What is wrong with Bayes nets?’, The Monist 84(2), pages 242-264.Google Scholar
  7. [Cooper, 1999] Gregory F. Cooper: ‘An overview of the representation and discovery of causal relationships using Bayesian networks’, in [Glymour and Cooper, 1999], pages 3-62.Google Scholar
  8. [Cooper, 2000] Gregory F. Cooper: ‘A Bayesian method for causal modeling and discovery under selection’, in Proceedings of the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2000, pages 98-106.Google Scholar
  9. [Corfield and Williamson, 2001] David Corfield and Jon Williamson (eds.): ‘Foundations of Bayesianism’, Kluwer Applied Logic Series, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. [Dai et al., 1997] Honghua Dai, Kevin Korb, Chris Wallace and Xindong Wu: ‘A study of causal discovery with weak links and small samples’, in Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-97), Nagoya, Japan, August 23-29 1997.Google Scholar
  11. [Dash and Druzdzel, 1999] Denver Dash and Marek Druzdzel: ‘A Fundamental Inconsistency Between Causal Discovery and Causal Reasoning’, in Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Conditional Independence Structures and the Workshop on Causal Interpretation of Graphical Models, The Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  12. [Dawid, 2001] A.P. Dawid: ‘Causal inference without counterfactuals’, in [Corfield and Williamson, 2001], pages 37-74.Google Scholar
  13. [Dowe, 1993] Phil Dowe: ‘On the reduction of process causality to statistical relations’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, pages 325-327.Google Scholar
  14. [Dowe, 1996] Phil Dowe: ‘Backwards causation and the direction of causal processes’, Mind 105, pages 227-248.Google Scholar
  15. [Dowe, 1999] Phil Dowe: ‘The conserved quantity theory of causation and chance raising’, Philosophy of Science 66 (Proceedings), pages S486-S501.Google Scholar
  16. [Dowe, 2000] Phil Dowe: ‘Causality and explanation: Review of Salmon’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51, pages 165-174.Google Scholar
  17. [Dowe, 2000b] Phil Dowe: ‘Physical causation’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. [Earman, 1992] John Earman: ‘Bayes or bust?’, Cambridge, Massachusetts: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  19. [Freedman and Humphreys, 1999] David Freedman and Paul Humphreys: ‘Are there algorithms that discover causal structure?’, Synthese 121, pages 29-54.Google Scholar
  20. [Gammerman, 1999] Alex Gammerman (ed.): ‘Causal models and intelligent data management’, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. [Glymour, 1997] Clark Glymour: ‘A review of recent work on the foundations of causal inference’, [McKim and Turner, 1997], pages 201-248.Google Scholar
  22. [Glymour, 2001] Clark Glymour: ‘The Mind’s Arrows: Bayes nets and graphical causal models in psychology’, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  23. [Glymour and Cooper, 1999] Clark Glymour and Gregory F. Cooper (eds.): ‘Computation, causation, and discovery’, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  24. [Hagmayer and Waldmann, 2002] York Hagmayer and Michael R. Waldmann: ‘A constraint satisfaction model of causal learning and reasoning’, in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. [Hausman, 1999] Daniel M. Hausman: ‘The mathematical theory of causation’, review of [McKim and Turner, 1997], British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, pages 151-162.Google Scholar
  26. [Hausman and Woodward, 1999] Daniel M. Hausman and James Woodward: ‘Independence, invariance and the causal Markov condition’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50, pages 521-583.Google Scholar
  27. [Heckerman et al., 1999] David Heckerman, Christopher Meek and Gregory Cooper: ‘A Bayesian approach to causal discovery’, in [Glymour and Cooper, 1999], pages 141-165.Google Scholar
  28. [Hempel and Oppenheim, 1948] Carl G. Hempel and Paul Oppenheim: ‘Studies in the logic of explanation’, with Postscript in [Pitt, 1988], pages 9-50.Google Scholar
  29. [Howson and Urbach, 1989] Colin Howson and Peter Urbach: ‘Scientific reasoning: the Bayesian approach’, Chicago: Open Court, Second edition, 1993.Google Scholar
  30. [Humphreys, 1997] Paul Humphreys: ‘A critical appraisal of causal discovery algorithms’, in [McKim and Turner, 1997], pages 249-263.Google Scholar
  31. [Humphreys and Freedman, 1996] Paul Humphreys and David Freedman: ‘The grand leap’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, pages 113-123.Google Scholar
  32. [James, 1907] William James: ‘What pragmatism means’, in ‘Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking’, New York: Longman Green and Co, pages 17-32.Google Scholar
  33. [Karimi and Hamilton, 2000] Kamran Karimi and Howard J. Hamilton: ‘Finding Temporal Relations: Causal Bayesian Networks versus C4.5’, Proceedings of the Twelfth International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent System (ISMIS’2000), Charlotte, NC, USA, October 2000.Google Scholar
  34. [Karimi and Hamilton, 2001] Kamran Karimi and Howard J. Hamilton: ‘Learning causal rules’, Technical Report CS-2001-03, Department of Computer Science, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada.Google Scholar
  35. [Korb, 1999] Kevin B. Korb: ‘Probabilistic causal structure’, in H. Sankey (ed.): ‘Causation and laws of nature’, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pages 265-311.Google Scholar
  36. [Korb and Nicholson, 2003] Kevin B. Korb and Ann E. Nicholson: ‘Bayesian artificial intelligence’, London: Chapman and Hall / CRC Press UK.Google Scholar
  37. [Lad, 1999] Frank Lad: ‘Assessing the foundation for Bayesian networks: a challenge to the principles and the practice’, Soft Computing 3(3), pages 174-180.Google Scholar
  38. [Lemmer, 1996] John F. Lemmer: ‘The causal Markov condition, fact or artifact?’, SIGART Bulletin 7(3), pages 3-16.Google Scholar
  39. [Lewis, 1973] David K. Lewis: ‘Causation’, with postscripts in [Lewis, 1986], pages 159-213.Google Scholar
  40. [Lewis, 1980] David K. Lewis: ‘A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance’, in [Lewis, 1986], pages 83-132.Google Scholar
  41. [Lewis, 1986] David K. Lewis: ‘Philosophical papers volume II’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. [Lewis, 1986b] David K. Lewis: ‘Causal explanation’, in [Lewis, 1986], pages 214-240.Google Scholar
  43. [Lewis, 2000] David K. Lewis: ‘Causation as influence’, The Journal of Philosophy 97(4), pages 182-197.Google Scholar
  44. [Mani and Cooper, 1999] Subramani Mani and Gregory F. Cooper: ‘A study in causal discovery from population-based infant birth and death records’, in Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 1999, Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus Publishers, pages 315-319.Google Scholar
  45. [Mani and Cooper, 2000] Subramani Mani and Gregory F. Cooper: ‘Causal discovery from medical textual data’, in Proceedings of the AMIA annual fall symposium 2000, Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus Publishers, pages 542-546.Google Scholar
  46. [Mani and Cooper, 2001] Subramani Mani and Gregory F. Cooper: ‘Simulation study of three related causal data mining algorithms’, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2001, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, pages 73-80.Google Scholar
  47. [McKim and Turner, 1997] Vaughn R. McKim and Stephen Turner: ‘Causality in crisis? Statistical methods and the search for causal knowledge in the social sciences’, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  48. [Menzies and Price, 1993] Peter Menzies and Huw Price: ‘Causation as a secondary quality’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44, pages 187-203.Google Scholar
  49. [Pearl, 1988] Judea Pearl: ‘Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference’, San Mateo, California: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  50. [Pearl, 1999] Judea Pearl: ‘Graphs, structural models, and causality’, in [Glymour and Cooper, 1999], pages 95-138.Google Scholar
  51. [Pearl, 2000] Judea Pearl: ‘Causality: models, reasoning, and inference’, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. [Peirce, 1877] Charles Sanders Peirce: ‘The fixation of belief’, Popular Science Monthly 12, pages 1-15.Google Scholar
  53. [Pitt, 1988] Joseph C. Pitt (ed.): ‘Theories of explanation’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. [Polya, 1945] George Polya: ‘How to solve it’, second edition, Penguin 1990.Google Scholar
  55. [Polya, 1954] George Polya: ‘Induction and analogy in mathematics’, volume 1 of ‘Mathematics and plausible reasoning’, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. [Polya, 1954b] George Polya: ‘Patterns of plausible inference’, volume 2 of ‘Mathematics and plausible reasoning’, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  57. [Popper, 1934] Karl R. Popper: ‘The Logic of Scientific Discovery’, with new appendices of 1959, London: Routledge 1999.Google Scholar
  58. [Price, 1991] Huw Price: ‘Agency and probabilistic causality’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42, pages 157-176.Google Scholar
  59. [Price, 1992] Huw Price: ‘Agency and causal asymmetry’, Mind 101, pages 501-520.Google Scholar
  60. [Price, 1992b] Huw Price: ‘The direction of causation: Ramsey’s ultimate contingency’, Philosophy of Science Association 1992(2), pages 253-267.Google Scholar
  61. [Price, 1996] Huw Price: ‘Time’s arrow and Archimedes’ point: new directions for the physics of time’, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. [Price, 2001] Huw Price: ‘Causation in the special sciences: the case for pragmatism’, in Domenico Costantini, Maria Carla Galavotti and Patrick Suppes (eds.): ‘Stochastic Causality’, Stanford, California: CSLI Publications, pages 103-120.Google Scholar
  63. [Price, 2003] Huw Price: ‘Truth as convenient friction’, Journal of Philosophy 100, pages 167-190.Google Scholar
  64. [Price, 2004] Huw Price: ‘Models and modals’, in Donald Gillies (ed.): ‘Laws and models in science’, London: King’s College Publications.Google Scholar
  65. [Railton, 1978] Peter Railton: ‘A deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation’, in [Pitt, 1988], pages 119-135.Google Scholar
  66. [Reichenbach, 1956] Hans Reichenbach: ‘The direction of time’, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1971.Google Scholar
  67. [Russell, 1913] Bertrand Russell: ‘On the notion of cause’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13, pages 1-26.Google Scholar
  68. [Salmon, 1980] Wesley C. Salmon: ‘Causality: production and propagation’, in [Sosa and Tooley, 1993], chapter 9.Google Scholar
  69. [Salmon, 1980b] Wesley C. Salmon: ‘Probabilistic causality’, in [Salmon, 1998], pages 208-232.Google Scholar
  70. [Salmon, 1984] Wesley C. Salmon: ‘Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world’, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. [Salmon, 1997] Wesley C. Salmon: ‘Causality and explanation: a reply to two critiques’, Philosophy of Science 64(3), pages 461-477.Google Scholar
  72. [Salmon, 1998] Wesley C. Salmon: ‘Causality and explanation’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. [Scheines, 1997] Richard Scheines: ‘An introduction to causal inference’, in [McKim and Turner, 1997], pages 185-199.Google Scholar
  74. [Sosa and Tooley, 1993] Ernest Sosa and Michael Tooley (eds.): ‘Causation’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. [Spirtes et al., 1993] Peter Spirtes, Clark Glymour and Richard Scheines: ‘Causation, Prediction, and Search’, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press, second edition 2000.Google Scholar
  76. [Stankovski et al., 2001] V. Stankovski, I. Bratko, J. Demsar and D. Smrke: ‘Induction of hypotheses concerning hip arthoplasty: a modified methodology for medical research’, Methods of Information in Medicine 40, pages 392-396.Google Scholar
  77. [Suppes, 1970] Patrick Suppes: ‘A probabilistic theory of causality’, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  78. [Tenenbaum and Griffiths, 2001] Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Thomas L. Griffiths: ‘Structure learning in human causal induction’, in T. Leen, T. Dietterich, and V. Tresp (eds.): Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The M.I.T. Press, pages 59-65.Google Scholar
  79. [Tong and Koller, 2001] Simon Tong and Daphne Koller: ‘Active Learning for Structure in Bayesian Networks’, in B. Nebel (ed.): Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, pages 863-869.Google Scholar
  80. [Waldmann, 2001] Michael R. Waldmann: ‘Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm’, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 8, pages 600-608.Google Scholar
  81. [Waldmann and Martignon, 1998] Michael R. Waldmann and Laura Martignon: ‘A Bayesian network model of causal learning’, in M.A. Gernsbacher and S.J. Derry (eds.): ‘Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society’, Mahwah, New Jersey: Erlbaum, pages 1102-1107.Google Scholar
  82. [Wallace and Korb, 1999] Chris S. Wallace and Kevin B. Korb: ‘Learning linear causal models by MML sampling’, in [Gammerman, 1999], pages 88-111.Google Scholar
  83. [Wendelken and Shastri, 2000] Carter Wendelken and Lokendra Shastri: ‘Probabilistic Inference and Learning in a Connectionist Causal Network’, In Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Neural Computation, Berlin, May 2000.Google Scholar
  84. [Williamson, 2004] Jon Williamson: ‘Bayesian nets and causality: philosophical and computational foundations’, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  85. [Woodward, 1997] James Woodward: ‘Causal models, probabilities, and invariance’, in [McKim and Turner, 1997], pages 265-315.Google Scholar
  86. [Yoo et al., 2002] Changwon Yoo, V. Thorsson and G. Cooper: ‘Discovery of Causal Relationships in a Gene-regulation Pathway from a Mixture of Experimental and Observational DNA Microarray Data’, in Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, New Jersey: World Scientific, pages 498-509.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jon Williamson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KentKent

Personalised recommendations