Traffic Flow Analysis Over a IPv6 Hybrid Manet
The Mobile Ad-hoc NETworks (MANET) consist of a spontaneous association of a group of nodes that dynamically change their position and exchange data between each other, regarded as autonomous network segments with flat address schemes. However, its study has shown the benefits obtained by interconnecting them to fixed network segments and Internet. This article will revise by means of using a simulation tool, the behavior of the data transmissions between the fixed network segment, a reactive gateway and the IPv6 MANET, whose nodes show a high degree of mobility, such as vehicles in an urban environment.
KeywordsMANET Hibrid Network Internet IPv6.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- S Corson, J. Macker, “Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations”, IETF RFC 2501, January 1999.Google Scholar
- I Chakeres, C. Perkins, “Dynamic MANET On-demand (DYMO) Routing”, IETF Internet-Draft, work in progress, March 2006.Google Scholar
- T Clausen, P. Jacquet, “Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR)”, IETF RFC 3626, October 2003.Google Scholar
- C Perkins, E.Belding-Royer, S. Das, “Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing”, IETF RFC 3561, July 2003.Google Scholar
- D Johnson, D. Maltz, Y. Hu, “The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (DSR)”, IETF Internet-Draft, work in progress, July 2004.Google Scholar
- R Ogier, F. Templin, M. Lewis, “Topology Dissemination Based on Reverse-Path Forwarding (TBRPF)”, IETF RFC 3684, February 2004.Google Scholar
- R Wakikawa, J. Malinen, C. Perkins, A. Nilsson, A. Tuominen, “Global Connectivity for IPv6 Mobile Ad Hoc Networks”, IETF Internet-Draft, work in progress, March 2006.Google Scholar
- A Hamidian, U. Körner, A. Nilsson, “Performance of Internet Access Solutions in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks” EuroNGI Workshop 2004: 189-209Google Scholar
- P Ruiz, A. Gomez-Skarmeta, “Enhanced Internet Connectivity for Hybrid Ad hoc Networks Through Adaptive Gateway Discovery,” lcn, pp. 370-377, 29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN’04), 2004.Google Scholar
- C Jelger, T. Noel, A. Frey, “Gateway and address autoconfiguration for IPv6 adhoc networks” IETF Internet-Draft, work in progress, October 2003.Google Scholar
- T Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network re- search. Wireless Communications F4 Mobile Computing (WCMC): Special issue on Mo- bile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and Applications, 2(5):483 502, 2002.Google Scholar
- J Broch, D. Maltz, D. Johnson, Y.C. Hu and J. Jetcheva, “A Performance Comparison of Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols,” Proc. ACM/IEEE MOBICOM Conf., pp. 85-97,Oct. 1998Google Scholar
- SJ. Lee, C.K. Toh, and M. Gerla, “Performance Evaluation of Table-Driven and On-Demand Ad Hoc Routing Protocols,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Comm., pp. 297-301, September 1999.Google Scholar
- P Johansson, T. Larsson, N. Hedman, B. Mielczarek and M. Degermark, “Scenario-Based Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks,” Proc. ACM/IEEE MOBICOM Conf., p. 195-206, 1999.Google Scholar
- M K. Marina and S. R. Das, “Ad hoc On-demand Multipath Distance Vector Routing”, ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review (MC2R) Special Feature on the First AODV Next Generation Workshop, July 2002.Google Scholar
-  The VINT Project, “The Network Simulator-ns-2,” http://www. isi.edu/nsnam/ns/.Google Scholar