Laboratory protocol to calibrate sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus L.) EMG signal output with swimming

  • P. R. AlmeidaEmail author
  • I. Póvoa
  • B. R. Quintella
Fish Telemetry
Part of the Developments in Hydrobiology 195 book series (DIHY, volume 195)


A correct application of electromyogram (EMG) telemetry in the field can be a powerful tool to evaluate activity patterns and swimming strategies of fishes. We evaluated the swim performance of seven untagged sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus L.) with critical swim speed (U crit) tests. The average U crit observed was c. 1.03 ms−1 (i.e., 1.14 BL s−1). The strongest reotaxic response was observed during tests using water velocities between 0.4 ms−1 and 0.8 ms−1. During two consecutive years (i.e., 2004 and 2005), in order to model upstream migration of sea lampreys with CEMG transmitters (Lotek Wireless), we calibrated EMG signal with swim speed. A high correlation between EMG records and swim speed was observed in both years (r 2 = 0.74–0.93). However, in spite of methodology improvements and standardization in the second year of study, differences in intercepts and slopes were observed between individuals, making the determination of a unique calibration equation for all tagged animals unfeasible. Therefore, it appears to be necessary to obtain the relationship between EMG signals and swimming speed for each lamprey using laboratory procedures, prior to release in the wild. It is unknown whether this variability results from individual locomotor behaviour, physiological state and/or variation in placement and functioning of the EMG transmitters. The results of five laboratory calibrated lampreys, released in the River Mondego, revealed considerable differences between swim speeds calculated with EMG signal (calibration equation) and ground speed therefore it was not possible to successfully calibrate the EMG signal output with swimming speed. In order to accomplish this, longer continuous swimming tests in laboratory are necessary. Nevertheless, the calibrated swimming effort gives reliable information about the swimming behaviour and permits comparison of the results between animals.


Electromyogram CEMG transmitters Biotelemetry Calibration Critical swimming speed 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Almeida, P. R., H. T. Silva & B. Quintella, 2000. The migratory behaviour of the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus L., observed by acoustic telemetry in the River Mondego (Portugal). In Moore, A. & I. Russel (eds), Advances in Fish Telemetry. CEFAS, Suffolk, 99–108.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, P. R., B. R. Quintella & N. M. Dias, 2002. Movement of radio-tagged anadromous sea lamprey during the spawning migration in the River Mondego (Portugal). Hydrobiologia 483: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beamish, F. W. H., 1974. Swimming performance of adult sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, in relation to weight and temperature. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 2: 355–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beamish, F. W. H., 1978. Swimming capacity. In Hoar, W. S. & D. J. Randall (eds), Fish Physiology, Vol. 7. Academic Press, New York, 101–187.Google Scholar
  5. Beamish, F. W. H., 1980. Biology of the North American anadromous sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37: 1924–1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergstedt, R. A., D. V. Rottiers & N. R. Foster, 1981. Laboratory determination of maximum swimming speed of migrating sea lampreys: a feasibility study. US Fish and Wildlife Service Ann Arbor, Great Lakes Fishery Laboratory, administrative report no 81-3, Michigan.Google Scholar
  7. Booth, R. K., R. S. McKinley, F. Økland & M. Sisak, 1997. In situ measurement of swimming performance of wild Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) using radio transmitter electromyogram signals. Aquatic Living Resources 10: 213–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brett, J. R., 1964. The respiratory metabolism and swimming performance of young sockeye salmon. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 21: 1183–1226.Google Scholar
  9. Brett, J. R., 1967. Swimming performance of sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in relation to fatigue time and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 24: 1731–1741.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, R. S., D. R. Geist & M. G. Mesa, 2002. The use of electromyogram (EMG) telemetry to assess swimming activity and energy use of adult spring chinook salmon migrating thought the tailraces, fishways, and forebays of Bonneville Dam, 2000 and 2001. US Army Corps of Engineers, Portland, PNNL-14080, Oregon.Google Scholar
  11. Cooke, S. J., E. B. Thorstad & S. G. Hinch, 2004. Activity and energetics of free swimming fish: insights from electromyogram telemetry. Fish and Fisheries 5: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Demers, E., R. S. McKinley, A. H. Weatherley & D. J. McQuenn, 1996. Activity patterns of largemouth and smallmouth bass determined with electromyogram biotelemetry. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125: 434–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell, A. P., C. G. Lee, K. Tierney, A. Hodaly, S. Clutterham, M. Healey, S. Hinch & A. Lotto, 2003. Field-based measurements of oxygen uptake and swimming performance with adult Pacific salmon using a mobile respirometer swim tunnel. Journal of Fish Biology 62: 64–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geist, D. R., C. S. Abernethy, S. L. Blanton & V. I. Cullinan, 2000. The use of electromyogram telemetry to estimate energy expenditure of adult fall chinook salmon. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129: 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geist, D. R., R. Brown, K. Lepla & J. Chandler, 2002. Practical application of electromyogram radiotelemetry: the suitability of applying laboratory-acquired calibration data to field data. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22: 474–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hanson, L. H., 1980. Study to determine the burst swimming speed of spawning-run sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Research completion report. Michigan, US Fish and wildlife service Hammond bay biological station, Millersburg.Google Scholar
  17. Hinch, S. G. & P. S. Rand, 1998. Swim speeds and energy use of upriver-migrating sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka): role of local environment and fish characteristics. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55: 1821–1831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hinch, S. G., E. M. Standen, M. C. Healey & A. P. Farell, 2002. Swimming patterns and behaviour of upriver-migrating adult pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and sockeye (O. nerka) salmon as assessed by EMG telemetry in the Fraser River, British Columbia, Canada. Hydrobiologia 483: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoar, P. A. & D. J. Randall, 1978. Locomotion, Fish physiology Vol. 7. Academic Press Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  20. Kaseloo, P. A., A. H. Weatherley, J. Lotimer & M. D. Farina, 1992. A biotelemetry system recording fish activity. Journal of Fish Biology 40: 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kieffer, J. D., 2000. Limits to exhaustive exercise in fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 126: 161–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mcfarlane, W. J., K. F. Cubitt, H. Williams, D. Rowsell, R. Moccia, R. Gosine & R. S. McKinley, 2004. Can feeding status and stress level be assessed by analyzing patterns of muscle activity in free swimming rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss Walbaum)? Aquaculture 239: 467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mesa, M. G., J. M. Bayer & J. G. Seelye, 2003. Swimming performance and physiological responses to exhaustive exercise in radio-tagged and untagged Pacific lampreys. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132: 483–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murchie, K. & K. E. Smokorowski, 2004. Relative activity of brook trout and walleye in response to flow in a regulated river. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 24: 1050–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Økland, F., B. Finstand, R. S. McKinley, E. B. Thorstad & R. K. Booth, 1997. Radio transmitted electromyogram signals as indicators of physical activity in Atlantic salmon. Journal of Fish Biology 51: 476–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plaut, I., 2001. Critical swimming speed: Its ecological relevance. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology (Part A) 131: 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Quintella, B. R., N. O. Andrade, A. Koed & P. R. Almeida, 2004. Behavioural patterns of sea lampreys spawning migration during difficult passage areas studied by electromyogram telemetry. Journal of Fish Biology 65: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Standen, E. M., S. G. Hinch, M. C. Healey & A. P. Farrell, 2002. Energetic costs of migration trough the Fraser River Canyon, British Columbia, in adult pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and sockeye (Oncorhynchus nerka) salmon as assessed by EMG telemetry. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 59: 1809–1818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sokal, R. E. & F. Rohlf, 1981. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 2nd edn. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Thorstad, E. B., F. Økland, A. Koed & R. S. McKinley, 2000. Radio transmitted electromyogram signals as indicators of swimming speed in lake trout and brown trout. Journal of Fish Biology 57: 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of ÉvoraEvoraPortugal
  2. 2.Institute of OceanographyFaculty of Sciences of the University of LisbonLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations