From Rescuing Frozen Embryos to Respecting the Limits of Nature: Reframing the Embryo Adoption Debate

  • Paul Lauritzen
Part of the Philosophy and Medicine book series (PHME, volume 95)
In 1985, Gary Trudeau and the Universal Press Syndicate agreed not to run six installments of the comic strip “Doonesbury” which parodied “The Silent Scream,” an anti-abortion film that showed ultrasound images of an abortion of a 12-weekold fetus taking place. The ultrasound images of the abortion depicted in “The Silent Scream” were accompanied by commentary from a physician–narrator, Bernard Nathanson, who had once performed abortions but had become a staunch opponent of abortion. In fact, the film takes its name from a series of images which Nathanson describes as follows:

We can see the tip [of the abortion instrument] move back and forth as the abortionist seeks the child’s body. Once again we can see the child’s mouth wide open in a silent scream in this particular freeze frame. This is the silent scream of a child threatened imminently with extinction.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althaus, C. (2005). ‘Can one “Rescue” a human embryo? The moral object of the acting woman,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 5, 114–141.Google Scholar
  2. Berkman, J.R. (2003). ‘Gestating the embryos of others: Surrogacy? Adoption? Rescue?’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 3, 309–329.Google Scholar
  3. Brakman, S.V. (2007). ‘Paradigms, practices and politics: Ethics and the language of human embryo transfer/donation/rescue/adoption,’ in M.J. Cherry. & A.S. Iltis (Eds.), Pluralistic Casuistry: Moral Argments, Economic Realities, and Political Theory, Essays in Honor of Baruch Brody (pp. 191–210). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Brugger, E.C. (2005). ‘In defense of transferring heterologous embryos,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 5, 95–112.Google Scholar
  5. Callahan, D. (1995). ‘The puzzle of profound respect,’ The Hastings Center Report, 25, 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, C.S. (2001). ‘Source or resource? Human embryo research as an ethical issue,’ in P. Lauritzen (Ed.), Cloning and the Future of Human Embryo Research (pp. 34–49). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1987). Donum Vitae (Instruction on respect for human life in its origin and on the dignity of procreation). Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, J.L. (2001). ‘A successful embryo adoption,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 1, 229–233.Google Scholar
  9. de Lacey, S. (2005). ‘Parent identity and ‘Virtual’ children: Why patients discard rather than donate unused embryos,’ Human Reproduction, 20, 1661–1669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geach, M. (1999). ‘Are there any circumstances in which it would be morally admirable for a woman to seek to have an orphan embryo implanted in her womb?’ in L. Gormally (Ed.), Issues for a Catholic Bioethic. London: The Linacre Centre.Google Scholar
  11. Iozzio, M.J. (2002). ‘It is time to Support Embryo Adoption,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 2, 585–593.Google Scholar
  12. Kaveny, C. (2006). ‘When Does Life Begin? Two Prolife Philosophers Disagree,’ Commonweal, 133, 6.Google Scholar
  13. Lauritzen, P. (2005). ‘Stem Cells, Biotechnology, and Human Rights: Implications for a Posthuman Future,’ Hastings Center Report, 35, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lejeune, J. (1992). The Concentration Can: When Does Human Life Begin? An Eminent Geneticist Testifies. San Francisco: Ignatius.Google Scholar
  15. May, W.E. (2005). ‘On “Rescuing” Frozen Embryos: Why the Decision to Do So Is Moral,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 5, 51–57.Google Scholar
  16. Nachtigall, R.D., Becker, G., Friese, C., Butler, A., & MacDougall, K. (2005). ‘Parents’ conceptualization of their Frozen Embryos Complicated the Disposition Decision,’ Fertility and Sterility, 84(2), 431–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nathanson, B. (1984). The Silent Scream [Online]. Available: http://www.silentscream.org/.
  18. Nussbaum, M.C. (2006). Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Onder, R.F. (2005). ‘Practical and Moral Caveats on Heterologous Embryo Transfer,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 5, 75–94.Google Scholar
  20. Ramsey, P. (1973). ‘Abortion: A Review Article,’ The Thomist, 20, 175–227.Google Scholar
  21. Ryan, M.A. (2001). ‘Creating Embryos for Research: On Weighing Symbolic Costs’ in P. Lauritzen (Ed.), Cloning and the Future of Human Embryo Research (pp. 50–66). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Tonti-Filippini, N. (2003). ‘The Embryo Rescue Debate: Impregnating Women, Ectogenesis, and Restoration from Suspended Animation,’ The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 5, 112–137.Google Scholar
  23. Trudeau, G. (1985). ‘Silent Scream II, the Prequel,’ Doonesbury. The New Republic, June 10, 8–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Lauritzen
    • 1
  1. 1.Director of the Program in Applied Ethics and Professor of Religious StudiesJohn Carroll UniversityClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations