History of muskellunge management in Nebraska
Muskellunge, Esox masquinongy, were first introduced to Nebraska waters in 1958. By 1967 anglers had caught the first muskellunge from Nebraska waters. Hybrid muskellunge, Esox masquinongy × E. lucius, culture and stocking started in 1976. Harvest regulations for muskellunge and hybrid muskellunge were first established in 1977 with a daily bag limit of one muskellunge or hybrid muskellunge of at least 762 mm (30 inches) in length. In 2000 the minimum length limit for muskellunge and hybrid muskellunge was increased to 1016 mm (40 inches). Hybrid muskellunge have been phased out, none have been stocked in Nebraska waters since 2003. Since 1998 muskellunge fingerlings have been held in Nebraska hatcheries until age-1 before stocking. Yearling muskellunge are raised on minnows and other small fish in Nebraska hatcheries and stocking success apparently is very good. Management and research of Nebraska’s muskellunge and hybrid muskellunge fisheries has been limited to routine sampling that has documented the presence of those fish in waters where they were stocked. Fishable populations of muskellunge can now be found in nine Nebraska waters across the state, but most Nebraska anglers are relatively uneducated in fishing techniques for muskellunge, identification, and proper handling.
KeywordsManagement Stocking Regulations
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bouc K (1975) Muskies in the making. Nebraskaland 53(2):35Google Scholar
- Brege DA (1986) A comparison of muskellunge and hybrid muskellunge in a southern Wisconsin lake. In: Hall GE (ed) Managing Muskies, Am Fish Soc Spec Pub 15:203–207Google Scholar
- Carline RF, Stein RA, Riley LM (1986) Effects of size at stocking, season, largemouth bass predation and forage abundance on survival of tiger muskellunge. In: Hall GE (ed) Managing Muskies, Am Fish Soc Spec Pub 15:151–167Google Scholar
- Casselman JM, Crossman EJ (1986) Size, age and growth of trophy muskellunge and muskellunge-northern pike hybrids – the cleithrum project, 1979–1983. In: Hall GE (ed) Managing Muskies, Am Fish Soc Spec Pub 15:93–110Google Scholar
- DeVries DR, Frie RV (1996) Determination of age and growth. In: Murphy BR, Willis DW (eds) Fisheries techniques, 2nd edn. Am Fish Soc, Bethesda, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- Hanson DA (1986) Population characteristics and angler use of muskellunge in eight northern Wisconsin lakes. In: Hall GE (ed) Managing Muskies, Am Fish Soc Spec Pub 15:238–248Google Scholar
- Johnson LD (1978) Evaluation of esocid stocking program in Wisconsin. In: Kendall RL (ed) Selected coolwater fishes of North America, Am Fish Soc Spec Pub 11:298–301Google Scholar
- Jones DJ (1963) A history of Nebraska’s fishery resources Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, LincolnGoogle Scholar
- Weithman AS, Anderson RO (1976) Angling vulnerability of Esocidae. Proc Con SE Assoc Fish Wild Agen 30:99–102Google Scholar
- Zuerlein GJ, Taylor MW (1985) Standard survey guidelines for sampling lake fishery resources. Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, LincolnGoogle Scholar