Advertisement

Automating Guidelines Inspection

From Web Site Specification to Deployment
  • Joseph Xiong
  • Mouhamed Diouf
  • Christelle Farenc
  • Marco Winckler

Abstract

This work focuses on how we can improve automatic evaluation based on guidelines inspection throughout the life cycle of Web applications by mapping guideline concepts to different artifacts produced during the development process. In order to support such an evaluation approach, we present a tool for automated evaluation based on guidelines reviews

Keywords

Accessibility Automated usability evaluation Development process Ergonomic inspection Usability Web sites 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Ardito, C., Lanzilotti, R., Buono, P., and Piccinno, A., A Tool to Support Usability Inspection, in Proc. of 8th Int. Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI’2006 (Venezia, 23-26 May 2006), ACM Press, New York, 2006, pp. 278–281.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Beirekdar, A., Vanderdonckt, J., and Noirhomme-Fraiture, M., A Framework and a Language for Usability Automatic Evaluation of Web Sites by Static Analysis of HTML Source Code, Chapter 29, in Ch. Kolski, J. Vanderdonckt (eds.), Proc. of 4th Int. Conf. on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces CADUI’2002 (Valenciennes, 15–17 May 2002), Kluwer Academics Pub., Dordrecht, 2002, pp. 337–348.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Brajnik, G., Automatic Web Usability Evaluation: What Needs to be Done?, in Ph. Kortum, E. Kudzinger (eds.), in Proc. of 6th Conf. on Human Factors and the Web HFWeb’2000 (Austin, 19 June 2000), University of Texas, Austin, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Campos, J.C., and Harrison, M.D., Formally Verifying Interactive Systems: A Review, in Proc. of Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS’97 (Granada, 4–6 June 1997), Springer-Verlag, Vienna, 1997, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Ivory, M.Y., Automated Web Site Evaluation: Researchers’ and Practitioners’ Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Javaux, D., Colard, M.-I., and Vanderdonckt, J., Visual Display Design: a Comparison of Two Methodologies, in A.F. Özok, G. Salvendy (eds.), Proc. of 1st Int. Conf. on Applied Ergonomics ICAE’96 (Istanbul, 21–24 May 1996), Istanbul - West Lafayette, 1996, pp. 662–667.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Matera, M., Costabile, M.F., Garzotto, F., and Paolini, P., SUE Inspection: An Effective Method for Systematic Usability Evaluation of Hypermedia, IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 32, No. 1, January 2002, pp. 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Palanque, P., Farenc, C., and Bastide, R., Embedding Ergonomic Rules as Generic Requirements in the Development Process of Interactive Software, in Proc. of 7th IFIP TC 13 Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction Interact’99 (Edinburgh, 30 August- 3 September 1999), IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999, pp. 408–416.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Scapin, D. et al., Conception ergonomique d’interfaces web: démarche et outil logiciel de guidage et de support, INRIA Technical Report of EvalWeb project, INRIA-Université de Toulouse 1-UCL, Rocquencourt-Toulouse-Louvain, December 1999.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Scapin, D., Leulier, C., Vanderdonckt, J., Bastien, Ch., Farenc, Ch., Palanque, Ph., and Bastide, R., Towards Automated Testing of Web Usability Guidelines, in Ph. Kortum, E. Kudzinger (eds.), Proc. of 6th Conf. on Human Factors and the Web HFWeb’2000 (Austin, 19 June 2000), University of Texas, Austin, 2000.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Scholtz, J., and Laskowski, S., Developing Usability Tools and Techniques for Designing and Testing Web Sites, in Proc. of the 4th Conf. on Human Factors and the Web HFWeb’98 (Basking Ridge, June 1998).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Seffah, A., Gulliksen, J., and Desmarais, M. (eds.), Human-Centered Software Engineering: Integrating Usability in the Software Development LifeCycle, Kluwer Academics Publishers, Dordretht, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Vanderdonckt, J., and Farenc, C., Tools for Working with Guidelines, Proc. of Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Tools for Working with Guidelines TFWWG’2000 (Biarritz, 7–8 October 2000), Springer-Verlag, London, 2001.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Vanderdonckt, J., Development Milestones towards a Tool for Working with Guidelines, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1999, pp. 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Winckler, M., and Palanque, P., StateWebCharts: a Formal Description Technique Dedicated to Navigation Modelling of Web Applications, in J. Jorge, N.J. Nunes, J. Cunha (eds.), Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems DSV-IS’2003 (Madeira, 4–6 June 2003), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2844, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2003, pp. 61–76.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Winckler, M., Farenc, C., and Palanque, P., Automatic Evaluation for the Web: How Improve Navigation Guidelines, in Proc. of ACM CHI’2002 Workshop on Automated Testing (Minneapolis, 21–22 April 2002), ACM, Minneapolis, 2002.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Xiong, J., Farenc, C., and Winckler, M., Vérification de règles ergonomiques sur un modèle de navigation des applications Web, in Proc. of 16th Conférence Francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine IHM’2004 (Namur, 30 August-3 September 2004), Presses Universitaires de Namur, Namur, 2004, pp. 259–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Xiong
    • 1
  • Mouhamed Diouf
    • 2
  • Christelle Farenc
    • 1
  • Marco Winckler
    • 1
  1. 1.LIIHS-IRITUniversité Paul SabatierToulouse Cedex 4France
  2. 2.L3A-LaBRIDomaine UniversitaireTalence CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations