Prikry-Type Forcings



One of the central topics of set theory since Cantor has been the study of the power function κ→2κ. The basic problem is to determine all the possible values of 2κ for a cardinal κ. Paul Cohen proved the independence of CH and invented the method of forcing. Easton building on Cohen’s results showed that the function κ→2κ for regular κ can behave in any prescribed way consistent with the Zermelo-König inequality, which entails cf (2κ)>κ. This reduces the study to singular cardinals.

It turned out that the situation with powers of singular cardinals is much more involved. Thus, for example, a remarkable theorem of Silver states that a singular cardinal of uncountable cofinality cannot be the first to violate GCH. The Singular Cardinal Problem is the problem of finding a complete set of rules describing the behavior of the function κ→2κ for singular κ’s.

There are three main tools for dealing with the problem: pcf theory, inner model theory and forcing involving large cardinals. The purpose of this chapter is to present the main forcing tools for dealing with powers of singular cardinals.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Uri Abraham and Menachem Magidor. Cardinal arithmetic. Chapter 14 in this Handbook. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5764-9_15.
  2. [2]
    Uri Abraham and Saharon Shelah. Forcing closed unbounded sets. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 48(3):643–657, 1983. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Arthur W. Apter. Patterns of compact cardinals. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 89:101–115, 1997. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Arthur W. Apter and Moti Gitik. The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 63(4):1404–1412, 1998. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    James E. Baumgartner. Iterated forcing. In Surveys in Set Theory, volume 87 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, pages 1–59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983. Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Maxim R. Burke and Menachem Magidor. Shelah’s pcf theory and its applications. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 50(3):207–254, 1990. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Paul Cohen. The independence of the continuum hypothesis. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 50:1143–1148, 1963. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    James Cummings. Iterated forcing and elementary embeddings. Chapter 12 in this Handbook. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5764-9_13
  9. [9]
    James Cummings. A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 329(1):1–39, 1992. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    James Cummings and W. Hugh Woodin. A book on Radin forcing. In preparation. Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    William B. Easton. Powers of regular cardinals. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 1:139–178, 1970. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Matthew Foreman and W. Hugh Woodin. The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere. Annals of Mathematics (2), 133(1):1–35, 1991. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Moti Gitik. Changing cofinalities and the nonstationary ideal. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 56(3):280–314, 1986. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Moti Gitik. On the Mitchell and Rudin-Keisler orderings of ultrafilters. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 39(2):175–197, 1988. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Moti Gitik. The negation of the singular cardinal hypothesis from o(κ)=κ ++. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 43(3):209–234, 1989. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Moti Gitik. On closed unbounded sets consisting of former regulars. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 64(1):1–12, 1999. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Moti Gitik. Blowing up power of a singular cardinal—wider gaps. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 116(1–3):1–38, 2002. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Moti Gitik. On gaps under GCH type assumptions. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 119(1–3):1–18, 2003. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Moti Gitik and Menachem Magidor. The singular cardinal hypothesis revisited. In Set Theory of the Continuum (Berkeley, CA, 1989), volume 26 of Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications, pages 243–279. Springer, New York, 1992. Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Moti Gitik and Menachem Magidor. Extender based forcings. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 59(2):445–460, 1994. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Moti Gitik and William J. Mitchell. Indiscernible sequences for extenders, and the singular cardinal hypothesis. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 82(3):273–316, 1996. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Moti Gitik and Saharon Shelah. On some configurations related to the Shelah weak hypothesis. Archive for Mathematical Logic, 40(8):639–650, 2001. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Moti Gitik, Ralf Schindler, and Saharon Shelah. Pcf theory and Woodin cardinals. In Logic Colloquium (Münster, Germany, 2002), volume 27 of Lecture Notes in Logic, pages 172–2056. Association for Symbolic Logic, Urbana, 2006. Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Thomas J. Jech. Singular cardinals and the pcf theory. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 1(4):408–424, 1995. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Thomas J. Jech. Set Theory. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 2002. The third millennium edition, revised and expanded. Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Akihiro Kanamori. The Higher Infinite. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 2003. Second edition. MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Akihiro Kanamori and Menachem Magidor. The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory. In Higher Set Theory (Proc. Conf., Math. Forschungsinst., Oberwolfach, 1977), volume 669 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 99–275. Springer, Berlin, 1978. Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Yechiel Kimchi and Menachem Magidor. The independence between the concepts of compactness and supercompactness. Manuscript. Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    John Kruger. Destroying stationary sets. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 147:285–328, 2005. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Kenneth Kunen. Set theory, volume 102 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983. Reprint of the 1980 original. MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Kenneth Kunen and Jeffrey B. Paris. Boolean extensions and measurable cardinals. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 2(4):359–377, 1970/1971. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Jeffrey S. Leaning. Disassociated indiscernibles. To appear in The Journal of Symbolic Logic. Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Azriel Levy and Robert M. Solovay. Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 5:234–248, 1967. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Menachem Magidor. How large is the first strongly compact cardinal? or A study on identity crises. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 10(1):33–57, 1976. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Menachem Magidor. On the singular cardinals problem. I. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 28(1–2):1–31, 1977. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Menachem Magidor. On the singular cardinals problem. II. Annals of Mathematics (2), 106(3):517–547, 1977. CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Menachem Magidor. Changing cofinality of cardinals. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 99(1):61–71, 1978. MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Adrian R.D. Mathias. On sequences generic in the sense of Prikry. Australian Mathematical Society, 15:409–414, 1973. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Carmi Merimovich. Extender-based Radin forcing. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 355(5):1729–1772, 2003. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Carmi Merimovich. A power function with a fixed finite gap everywhere. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 72:361–417, 2007. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    William J. Mitchell. The Covering Lemma. Chapter 18 in this Handbook. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5764-9_19
  42. [42]
    William J. Mitchell. How weak is a closed unbounded ultrafilter? In Logic Colloquium ’80 (Prague, 1980), volume 108 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, pages 209–230. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982. Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    William J. Mitchell. The core model for sequences of measures. I. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 95(2):229–260, 1984. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    William J. Mitchell. Indiscernibles, skies, and ideals. In Axiomatic Set Theory (Boulder, Colo., 1983), volume 31 of Contemporary Mathematics, pages 161–182. Amrican Mathematical Society, Providence, 1984. Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    William J. Mitchell. Applications of the covering lemma for sequences of measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 299(1):41–58, 1987. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    William J. Mitchell. A measurable cardinal with a closed unbounded set of inaccessibles from o(κ)=κ. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 353(12):4863–4897, 2001. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Karel L. Prikry. Changing measurable into accessible cardinals. Dissertationes Mathematicae (Rozprawy Matematyczne), 68:55, 1970. MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Lon B. Radin. Adding closed cofinal sequences to large cardinals. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 22(3):243–261, 1982. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Miri Segal. Master thesis, The Hebrew University, 1993. Google Scholar
  50. [50]
    Assaf Sharon. Generators of pcf. Master thesis, Tel Aviv University, 2000. Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    Saharon Shelah. Some notes on iterated forcing with \(2^{\aleph\sb0}>\aleph_{2}\) . Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 29(1):1–17, 1988. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    Saharon Shelah. Cardinal arithmetic for skeptics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society (N.S.), 26(2):197–210, 1992. MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Saharon Shelah. Cardinal Arithmetic, volume 29 of Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford University Press, New York, 1994. MATHGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Saharon Shelah. Proper and Improper Forcing. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, Berlin, 1998. Second edition. MATHGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Robert M. Solovay. Strongly compact cardinals and the GCH. In Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, volume XXV of Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, pages 365–372. American Mathematics Society, Providence, 1974. Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Robert M. Solovay, William N. Reinhardt, and Akihiro Kanamori. Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings. Annals of Mathematical Logic, 13(1):73–116, 1978. MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations