Advertisement

Optimizing Soil Fertility Gradients in the Enset (Ensete ventricosum)labelChapter26 Systems of the Ethiopian Highlands: Trade-offs and Local Innovations

  • Tilahun Amede
  • Endale Taboge

Abstract

Ensete ventricosum is a perennial, security crop that feeds about 13 million people in Ethiopia. It is grown in the homesteads, covering about 18% of the farm, in mixture with Coffee, kale, and other vegetables. The recent shift from enset to cereals and continual soil fertility decline in the outfields caused food deficit for at least three months in a year. The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of soil fertility gradients on enset growth, identify the major growth limiting nutrients, and identify farmers’ decision making criteria in allocating resources to various enterprises. The research was conducted on farmer’s fields of resource rich (G1) and poor (G3) for four years (2001–2004). Enset transplants were planted in homestead and outfields. Application of fertilizers by farmers to different units over seasons and years was recorded. Enset growth and nutrient content was measured. The results showed that the G1 group produced about 2xs more organic waste than G3, and purchased chemical fertilizers 5xs more than the G3 farmers. About 80% of the organic resource produced was allocated for maintaining soil fertility, while 20% being allocated as cooking fuel. Of this 65% is allocated for the enset field in the homestead. There were significantly higher N, P, K and Ca contents in the homestead soils than in the outfield, regardless of farmers’ resource endowment. The P content of the outfield was the lowest, less than 25% of the P content of the homestead. Similarly organic matter in the outfield was only about 40% of the homestead. Enset plants grown in the outfields experienced about 90% height reduction and 50% reduction in pseudo stem diameter, regardless of resource categories, while the NPK content of the plant tissues grown in the outfield was significantly higher, in some case up to 150% than those planted in homestead. We thus concluded that growth reduction in the outfield was not directly related to NPK deficiency, but it could have been caused by off-season moisture stress in the outfields, manifested by low soil organic matter. The attempt to attract resources to the outfield using enset as an attractant crop failed, not because of labour shortage but because of unavailability of enough organic resources in the system. Hence on spot management of nutrients was initiated by farmers.

Keywords

Ensete ventricosum farmer innovation growth nutrients soil fertility gradient 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amede T. and Kirkby R. 2004. Guidelines for Integration of Legume Cover Crops into the Farming Systems of East African Highlands, pp. 43–64. In: Bationo A. (Ed.) Managing nutrient cycles to sustain soil fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa. Academic Science Publishers, pp. 43–64.Google Scholar
  2. Amede T., Takele B. and Endrias G. 2001. Reversing the degradation of arable land in Ethiopian Highlands. Managing African Soils: No. 23. IIED, London.Google Scholar
  3. Amede T. and Schubert S. 2003 Mechanisms of drought resistance in grain legumes: Osmotic adjustment. SINET: Eth. J. Sci. 26 (1): 37–46.Google Scholar
  4. Amede T., Stroud A. and Aune J. 2004. Advancing human nutrition without degrading land resources through modeling cropping systems in Ethiopian highlands. Food and Nutrition Bulletin 25(4): 344–353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson J.M and Ingram J.S.L. 1993. Tropical Soil biology and Fertility: A hand book of methods. CAB International, Willingford, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Bayush T. 1991. Community management of crop genetic resources in the Enset complex farming systems of Southern Ethiopia. A case study from Sidama region. Unpublished MSc thesis. Agricultural University of Norway.Google Scholar
  7. Bekunda M.1999. Farmers’ response to soil fertility decline in banana-based cropping systems of Uganda. Managing African Soils No. 4. IIED-London. 17p.Google Scholar
  8. Brandt S., Spring A., Hiebsch C., McCabe T., Taboge E., Diro M., Micheal G., Ynitso G., Shigeta M. and Tesfaye S. 1997. The ‘Tree Against Hunger’: Enset-based Agricultural systems in Ethiopia. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 66p.Google Scholar
  9. Elias E. 2000. Soil enrichment and deletion in Southern Ethiopia. Pp 65–82. In: Hillhorst, T. and Muchena F. (Eds). Nutrients on the move: Soil fertility dynamics in African farming systems, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
  10. Kippe T. 2002. Five thousand years of sustainability? A case stud of Gedeo land use, Southern Ethiopia. Tree book 5, Treemial Publishers, Heelsum, The Netherlands. 261p.Google Scholar
  11. Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Second edition. Academic press, U.K., 889p.Google Scholar
  12. Parkinson J.A. and Allen S.E. 1975. A wet oxidation procedure suitable for the determination of nitrogen and mineral nutrients in biological materials. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6:1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tsgaye A. 2002. On indigenous production, genetic diversity and crop ecology of Enset (Ensete ventricosum). PhD Dissertation, Wageningen University.198p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tilahun Amede
    • 1
  • Endale Taboge
    • 2
  1. 1.International Livestock Research Institute/International Water Management Institute (ILRI/IWMI), Addis Ababa EthiopiaAddis AbabaEthiopia
  2. 2.Areka Research Centre, Southern Regions Agricultural Research InstituteSoddoEthiopia

Personalised recommendations