Combining Human & Machine Brains

Practical Systems in Information & Control
  • Kevin Warwick

Abstract

In this paper a look is taken at how the use of implant technology can be used to either increase the range of the abilities of a human and/or diminish the effects of a neural illness, such as Parkinson’s Disease. The key element is the need for a clear interface linking the human brain directly with a computer. The area of interest here is the use of implant technology, particularly where a connection is made between technology and the human brain and/or nervous system. Pilot tests and experimentation are invariably carried out apriori to investigate the eventual possibilities before human subjects are themselves involved. Some of the more pertinent animal studies are discussed here. The paper goes on to describe human experimentation, in particular that carried out by the author himself, which led to him receiving a neural implant which linked his nervous system bi-directionally with the internet. With this in place neural signals were transmitted to various technological devices to directly control them. In particular, feedback to the brain was obtained from the fingertips of a robot hand and ultrasonic (extra) sensory input. A view is taken as to the prospects for the future, both in the near term as a therapeutic device and in the long term as a form of enhancement.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence Biological systems Implant technology Feedback control 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chapin, J.K., Using multi-neuron population Recordings for Neural Prosthetics. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 7, pp. 452-454, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dobelle, W., Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex, ASAIO J, Vol. 46, pp. 3-9, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Finn, W. and LoPresti, P. (eds.), Handbook of Neuroprosthetic methods, CRC Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. Gasson, M., Hutt, B., Goodhew, I., Kyberd, P. and Warwick, K., Invasive neural prosthesis for neural signal detection and nerve stimulation, Proc. International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, Vol. 19, No.5, pp. 365-375, 2005.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Kennedy, P., Andreasen, D., Ehirim, P., King, B., Kirby, T., Mao, H. and Moore, M., Using human extra-cortical local field potentials to control a switch, Journal of Neural Engineering, Vol. 1, Issue.2, pp. 72-77, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mann, S., Wearable Computing: A first step towards personal imaging, Computer, Vol. 30, Issue.2, pp. 25-32, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Penny, W., Roberts, S., Curran, E., and Stokes, M., EEG-based communication: A pattern recognition approach, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering., Vol. 8, Issue.2, pp. 214-215, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Reger, B., Fleming, K., Sanguineti, V., Simon Alford, S., Mussa-Ivaldi, F., Connecting Brains to Robots: an artificial body for studying computational properties of neural tissues, Artificial life, Vol. 6, Issue.4, pp. 307-324, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rizzo, J., Wyatt, J., Humayun, M., DeJuan, E., Liu, W., Chow, A., Eckmiller, R., Zrenner, E., Yagi, T. and Abrams, G., Retinal Prosthesis: An encouraging first decade with major challenges ahead, Opthalmology, Vol. 108, No.1, 2001.Google Scholar
  10. Warwick, K., Gasson, M., Hutt, B., Goodhew, I., Kyberd, P., Andrews, B., Teddy, P., Shad, A., The application of implant technology for cybernetic systems. Archives of Neurology, Vol. 60 Issue 10, pp. 1369-1373, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Warwick, K., Gasson, M., Hutt, B., Goodhew, I., Kyberd, P., Schulzrinne, H. and Wu, X., Thought Communication and Control: A First Step Using Radiotelegraphy, IEE Proceedings on Communications, Vol. 151, No. 3, pp. 185-189, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Warwick, K., Gasson, M., Hutt, B. and Goodhew, I., An Attempt to Extend Human Sensory Capabilities by means of Implant Technology. Proc. IEEE Int. Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Hawaii, to appear, October 2005.Google Scholar
  13. Yu, N., Chen, J., Ju, M., Closed-Loop Control of Quadriceps/Hamstring activation for FES-Induced Standing-Up Movement of Paraplegics, Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, Vol. 5, No.3, pp. 173-184, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Warwick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of CyberneticsUniversity of ReadingReading, RG6 6AYUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations