Advertisement

Did Neanderthals make the Châtelperronian assemblage from La Grotte du Renne (Arcy-sur-Cure, France)?

  • S. E. Bailey
  • J. J. Hublin
Part of the Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology book series (VERT)

Much debate has focused on the significance of the “modern” cultural elements found in European Late Middle Paleolithic (Châtelperronian, Uluzzian, and Szeletian) contexts. In light of evidence suggesting cultural interaction between the makers of these industries and the makers of the Aurignacian (presumably anatomically modern humans) it is imperative that the taxonomic affiliation of the hominins associated with these “transitional” industries be accurately identified. The fossil remains from the Châtelperronian levels (VIII-X) at the Grotte du Renne (Arcy-sur-Cure, France) comprise a series of isolated teeth, as well as a child’s temporal bone. While the temporal bone has been analyzed (and identified as having Neanderthal affinity), most of the 29 teeth from these levels have not been described. The Châtelperronian dental remains from the Grotte du Renne comprise both permanent and deciduous teeth. Fortunately, most are well preserved and relatively unworn. Simple dental dimensions are not par-ticularly helpful in attempts to differentiate between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans. The dimen-sions of the postcanine teeth in these two groups overlap completely. However, Neanderthals are known to have larger anterior teeth (on average), especially relative to their postcanine tooth size. Not surprisingly, we find that the crown dimensions for the postcanine teeth from the Grotte du Renne fall within the ranges of both hominin groups.

Keywords

Neanderthal remains fossil teeth dental morphology Late Middle Paleolithic 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bailey, S.E., 2000. Dental morphological affinities Dental Biology: Palaeontology, Anthropology among late Pleistocene and recent humans. Dent. Anthropol. 14, 1-8.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, S.E., 2002a. A closer look at Neanderthal post- canine dental morphology. I. The mandibular dentition. New Anat. 269, 148-156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, S.E., 2002b. Neandertal Dental Morphology: Implications for modern human origins. Ph.D. Dissertation, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, S.E., 2004. A morphometric analysis of maxil- lary molar crowns of Middle- Late Pleistocene hominins. J. Hum. Evol. 47, 183-198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, S.E., 2005. Diagnostic dental differences between Neandertals and Upper Paleolithic humans: Getting to the root of the matter. In Źşdzińska, E. (Ed.) Current Trends in Dental Morphology Research: Proceedings of the 13th InternationalSymposium on Dental Morphology. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, Łódź, pp. 201-210.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, S.E., Hublin, J.-J., 2005. Who made the Early Aurignacian? A reconsideration of the Brassempouy dental remains. Bull. Mém. Soc. Anthropol. Paris 17, 115-121.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, S.E., Hublin, J.-J., 2006. Dental remains from the Grotte de Renne at Arcy-sur-Cure (Yonne). J. Hum. Evol. 50, 485-508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey, S.E., Lynch, J.M., 2005. Diagnostic differences in mandibular P4 shape between Neandertals and anatomically modern humans. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 126, 268-277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boule, M., Vallois, H.V., 1957. Fossil Men. Dryden Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Burnett, S.E., 1998. Maxillary Premolar Accessory Ridges (MXPAR): Worldwide Occurrence and Utility in Population Differentiation. Masters Thesis, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  11. Bytnar, J.A., Trinkaus, E., Falsetti, A.B., 1994. A dental comparison of Middle Paleolithic Near Eastern hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 19, 63. Google Scholar
  12. Conard, N.J., Grootes, P.M., Smith, F.H., 2004. Unexpectedly recent dates for human remains from Vogelherd. Nature 430, 198-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connet, N., 2002. Le Châtelperronien: Réflexions sur l’unité et l’identite techno-économique de l’in- dustrie lithique. L’apport de l’analyse diachronique des industries lithiques des couches Châtelperronienes de la Grotte du Renne a Arcy-sur-Cure(Yonne). Ph.D. Dissertation, Universite de Lille 1. and Evolution. International Institute for the Study of Man, Florence, pp. 305-313. Google Scholar
  14. d’Errico, F., Zilhão, J., Julien, M., Baffler, D., Pelegrin, J., 1998. Neanderthal acculturation in Western Europe? A critical review of the evidence and its interpretation. Curr. Anthropol. 39, S1-S44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. d’Errico, F., Julien, M., Liolios, D., VanHaren, M. and Baffier, D. 2003. Many awls in our argument: bone tool manufacture and use in the Châtelperronian and Aurignacian levels of the Grotte de Renne at Arcy-sur-Cure. In:Zilhão, J.and d’Errico, F.(Eds.), The Chronology of the Aurignacian and of the Transitional Technocomplexes: Dating, Stratigraphies, Cultural Implications. Proceedings of Symposium 6.1 of the 14th Congress of the UISPP, Instituto Portugês de Arqueologia, Lisbon, pp. 247-270.Google Scholar
  16. David, F., Connet, N., Girard, M., Lhomme, V., Miskovsky, J.C., Roblin-Jouve, A., 2001. Le Châtelperronien de la Grotte du Renne à Arcy-sur-Cure (Yonne). Données sédimentologiques et chronostratigraphiques. Bull. Soc. Préhist. Fr. 98, 207-230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Demars, P.Y., Hublin, J.-J., 1989. La transition néandertal- iens/hommes de type moderne en Europe occiden- tale: aspects paleontologiques et culturels. In: Otte, M. and Laville, H. (Eds.), L’homme Néandertal 7: l’extinction. ERAUL, Liège, pp. 29-42.Google Scholar
  18. Harrold, F.B., 1989. Mousterian, Châtelperronian and early Aurignacian in Western Europe: continuity or discontinuity? In: Mellars, P. and Stringer, C.B. (Eds.), The Human Revolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 677-713. Google Scholar
  19. Henry-Gambier, D., Maureille, B., White, R., 2004. Vestiges humains des niveaux de l’Aurignacien ancien du site de Brassempouy (Landes). Bull. Mém. Soc. Anthropol. Paris 16, 49-87.Google Scholar
  20. Hublin, J.-J., Spoor, F., Braun, M., Zonneveld, F.W., Condemi, S., 1996. A late Neanderthal associ- ated with Upper Palaeolithic aftefacts. Nature 381, 224-226. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1958. Étude des restes humains fos- siles provenant des Grottes d’Arcy-sur-Cure. Ann. Paléontol. 44, 87-148.Google Scholar
  22. Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1961. Les fouilles d’Arcy-sur-Cure (Yonne). Gallia préhistoire 4, 3-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lévêque, F., Vandermeersch, B., 1980. Découverte de restes humains dans un niveau castelperronien à Saint-Césaire (Charente-Maritime). C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 291, 187-189.Google Scholar
  24. Mellars, P., 2004. Neanderthals and the modern human colonization of Europe. Nature 432, 461-465. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mizoguchi, Y., 1985. Shovelling: A Statistical Analysis of Its Morphology. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo. Google Scholar
  26. Turner, C.G., II, Nichol, C.R., Scott, G.R., 1991. Scoring procedures for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: The Arizona State University Dental Anthropology System. In: Kelley, M., Larsen, C. (Eds.), Advances in Dental Anthropology. Wiley Liss, New York, pp. 13-31.Google Scholar
  27. White, R., 2001. Personal ornaments from the Grotte du Renne at Arcy-sur-Cure. Athena Rev. 2, 41-46.Google Scholar
  28. Zubov, A., 1992. The epicristid or middle trigonid crest defined. Dental Anthropol. Newslett. 6, 9-10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Bailey
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. J. Hublin
    • 1
  1. 1.Abteilung für HumanevolutionMax-Planck-Institut für Evolutionäre AnthropologieLeipzigGermany
  2. 2.Center for the Study of Human Origins Department of AnthropologyNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations