Advertisement

Importance and Satisfaction With Life Domains in Croatia: Representative Sample

  • Ljiljana Kaliterna Lipovcan
  • Zvjezdana Prizmic-Larsen
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 29)

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Life Domain Material Status Importance Rating Social Indicator Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carstensen, L.L., Fung, H.H., and Charles, S.T. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27: 103–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cheung, C.K. and Leung, K.K. (2004). Forming life satisfaction among different social groups during the modernization of China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5:23–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, A.E. and Oswald, A.J. (1996). Satisfaction and comparison income. Journal of Public Economics, 61:359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummins, R.A. (1996). The domains of life satisfaction: An attempt to order chaos. Social Indicators Research, 38:303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummins, R.A. (2002a). Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale- Adult (ComQol-A5) Subjective part—Croatian Version (5th edition), School of Psychology, Deakin University. Available at http://acqol.deakin.edu.au\instruments\ComQoL(10)HR2.rtf.
  6. Cummins, R.A. (2002b). Caveats to the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale. School of Psychology, Deakin University. Available at http://acqol.deakin.edu.au\instruments\Caveats_ComQol_scales.doc.
  7. Cummins, R.A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., van Vugt, J., and Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: the Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64:159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Delhey, J. (2004). Life Satisfaction in an Enlarged Europe. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Condition: Ireland. Available at http://www.euro-found.eu.int\publications\EF03108.htm.
  9. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95:542–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E. and Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7:181–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diener, E., Emmons, R.A., Larsen, R.J., and Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale: A measure of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49:71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayo, B. and Seifert, W. (2003). Subjective economic well-being in Eastern Europe. Journal of Economic Psychology, 24:329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsieh, C.M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicator Research, 61:227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsieh, C.M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicator Research, 68:163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keck, W. and Delhey, J. (2004). “Subjective well-being” in Quality of life in Europe. Report of European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Condition: Ireland. Available at http://www.eurofound.eu.int\publications\EF04105.htm.
  16. Lang, F.R. and Heckhausen, J. (2001). Perceived control over development and subjective well-being: differential benefits across adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81:509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latten, J.J. (1989). Life-course and satisfaction, equal for every-one? Social Indicators Research, 21:599–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.Google Scholar
  19. Powers, C.B., Wisocki, P.A., and Whitbourne, S.K. (1992). Age differences and correlates of worrying in young and elderly adults. Gerontologist, 32:82–88.Google Scholar
  20. Renwick R., Brown, I., and Nagler, M. (eds.) (1996). Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation: Conceptual Approaches, Issues, and Applications. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Scheldon, K.M. and Kasser, T. (2001). Goals, congruence, and positive well-being: New empirical support for humanistic theories. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41: 30–50.Google Scholar
  22. Shmotkin, D. (1990). Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends. Social Indicators Research, 23:201–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Trauer, T. and Mackinnon, A. (2001). Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care & Rehabilitation, 10: 579–585.Google Scholar
  24. Tsou, M.W. and Liu, J.T. (2001). Happiness and domain satisfaction in Taiwan. Journal of Happiness Studies, 2:269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Veenhoven, R. (1996). Developments in satisfaction research. Social Indicators Research, 37:1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wicker, F.W., Brown, G., Wiehe, J.A., Hagen, A.S., and Reed, J.L. (1993). On reconsidering Maslow: An examination of the deprivation\domination proposition. Journal of Research in Personality, 27:118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ljiljana Kaliterna Lipovcan
  • Zvjezdana Prizmic-Larsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations