EVALUATING THE POTENTIAL DAMAGE TO STONES FROM WETTING AND DRYING CYCLES
Abstract
The literature on stone conservation often mentions that clay-containing stones can be damaged over time through cycles of wetting and drying (Félix 1988). Several studies demonstrate the deleterious action of these cycles on stones consolidated with ethyl silicates [Félix and Furlan (1994), Félix (1995)]. However, to our knowledge, only one study (Wendler et al. 1996) demonstrates that these cycles can damage unconsolidated stone. The procedure is rather long and probably this is the reason for which so little work has been done to examine the importance of this damage mechanism.In this paper, we present a testing machine that has been developed to automate and accelerate the rate at which stone samples may be submitted to these cycles. Direct measurement of swelling indicates that swelling increases with the number of cycles, indicating progressive damage. However, the swelling can be durably reduced, although not completely eliminated by swelling inhibitors.We use a novel technique to examine the behavior of swelling stones, which consists in measuring the warping of a thin stone plate placed on two supports and which is wetted from above. Deflection and relaxation of the plate can be analyzed to extract free swelling, the ratio of wet to dry modulus and the sorptivity of the stone. However, agreement with separate measurements requires introducing a separate kinetic expression for the rate of swelling.
Keywords
Maximum Deflection Modulus Ratio Stone Sample Ethyl Silicate Deleterious ActionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Félix, C., 1988, Comportement des grès en construction sur le plateau suisse (Performance of Sandstones in Construction on the Swiss Plateau). In LCP Publications 1975–1995, Montreux, R. Pancella Ed., EPFL, 833–841Google Scholar
- 2.Félix, C.; Furlan, V., 1994, Variations dimensionnelles des gres et calcaires liees a leur consolidation avec un silicate d’ethyle (Dimensional changes of sandstones and limestones related to their consolidation with an ethyl silicate). In 3rd international Symposium on the conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin. Edited by V. Fassina, F. Zezza. Venice, 22–25-JuneGoogle Scholar
- 3.Félix C., 1995, Choix de gres tenders du Plateau Suisse pour les travaux de conservation (Choice of soft sandstones from the Swiss plateau for conservation work). In Conservation et restauration des biens culturels, Actes du Congres LCP, Montreux, Septembre 1995, R. Pancella Ed., EPFL, 45–71.Google Scholar
- 4.Jiménez González, I.; Higgins, M. and Scherer, G.W., 2002, Hygric swelling of Portland Brownstone. In Materials Issues in Art & Archaeology VI, MRS Symposium Proc., eds P.B. Vandiver, M. Goodway and J.L. Mass (Material Res. Soc.), Warrendale, PA, Vol 712: 21–27.Google Scholar
- 5.Jiménez González, I. and Scherer, G.W., 2004, Effect of swelling inhibitors on the swelling and stress relaxation of clay bearing stones. In Environmental Geology, 46: 364–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Scherer, G.W. and Jiménez González, I., 2005, Characterization of swelling in clay-bearing stone. In Turkington A.V., ed., Stone decay in the architectural environment: Geological Society of America Special Paper 390: 51–61.Google Scholar
- 7.Wangler, T., 2005, Princeton University, private communicationGoogle Scholar
- 8.Wendler, E., Charola, A.E., and Fitzner, B., 1996, Easter Island tuff: Laboratory studies for its consolidation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, ed J. Riederer. Berlin, Germany, 2, 1159–1170.Google Scholar