NEW PROPOSAL OF NUMERICAL MODELLING OF BOSE-EINSTEIN CORRELATIONS: BOSE-EINSTEIN CORRELATIONS FROM “WITHIN”

  • Oleg V. Utyuzh
  • Grzegorz Wilk
  • Zbigniew Włodarczyk
Conference paper
Part of the NATO Security through Science Series book series

Abstract

We describe an attempt to numerically model Bose-Einstein correlations (BEC) from “within”, i.e., by using them as the most fundamental ingredient of a Monte Carlo event generator (MC) rather than considering them as a kind of (more or less important, depending on the actual situation) “afterburner”, which inevitably changes the original physical content of the MC code used to model multiparticle production process.

Keywords

Monte Carlo Identical Particle Multiplicity Distribution Monte Carlo Code Hadronization Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    R.M. Weiner, Introduction to Bose-Einstein Corrleations and Subatomic Interferometry, J. Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Csörgő, in Particle Production Spanning MeV and TeV Energies, eds. W.Kittel et al., NATO Science Series C, Vol. 554, Kluwer Acad. Pub. (2000), p. 203Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W. Kittel, Acta Phys. Polon. B 32, 3927 (2001).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Alexander, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66 (2003) 481.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk, Z. Wlodarczyk, Quantum Clan Model description of Bose Einstein Correlations, hep-ph/0503046, to be published in Acta Phys. Hung. A - Heavy Ion Phys. (2005).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.J. Eskola, Nucl. Phys. A 698, 78 (2002).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Osada, M. Maruyama and F. Takagi, Phys. Rev. D 59, 014024 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Zajc, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3396 (1987).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Merlitz and D. Pelte, Z. Phys. A 357, 175 (1997).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Geiger, J. Ellis, U. Heinz and U.A. Wiedemann, Phys. Rev. D 61, 054002 (2000).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. Lönnblad and T. Sjöstrand, Eur. Phys. J. C 2, 165 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Fiałkowski, R. Wit and J. Wosiek, Phys. Rev. D 58, 094013 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Andersson, Acta Phys. Polon. B 29, 1885 (1998).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, Phys. Rev. D 61, 034007 (1999).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, Phys. Lett. B 522, 273(2001).CrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, Acta Phys. Polon. B 33, 2681 (2002).ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.W. Goodman, Statistical Optics, John Wiley & Sons, 1985.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Buschbeck and H.C. Eggers, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 92, 235(2001).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    E.E. Purcell, Nature 178, 1449 (1956)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. Giovannini and H.B. Nielsen, Stimulated emission effect on multiplicity distribution in: Proc. of the IV Int. Symp. on Multip. Hadrodynamics, Pavia 1973, Eds. F. Duimio, A. Giovannini and S. Ratii, p. 538.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W.J. Knox, Phys. Rev. D 10, 65 (1974).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    E.H. De Groot and H. Satz, Nucl. Phys. B 130, 257 (1977).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. Kripfganz, Acta Phys. Polon. B 8, 945 (1977).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.M. Cooper, O. Miyamura, A. Suzuki and K. Takahashi, Phys. Lett. B 87, 393 (1979).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    F. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 120, 201 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. Giovannini and L. Van Hove, Z. Phys. C 30, 391 (1986).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    M. Biyajima, N. Suzuki, G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, Phys. Lett. B 386, 297 (1996).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F.S. Navarra, O.V. Utyuzh, G. Wilk and Z. Włodarczyk, Phys. Rev. D 67, 114002 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    P. Abreu et al. (DELPHI Collab.), Phys. Lett. B 286, 201(1992).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    W.A. Zajc, A pedestrian’s guide to interferometry, in “Particle Production in Highly Excited Matter”, eds. H.H.Gutbrod and J.Rafelski, Plenum Press, New York 1993, p. 435.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    G.A. Kozlov, O.V. Utyuzh and G. Wilk, Phys. Rev. C 68, 024901 (2003).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. Zalewski, Lecture Notes in Physics 539, 291 (2000).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Finkelstein, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2446 (1988).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ding-wei Huang, Phys. Rev. D 58, 017501 (1998).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. Kutner and M. Regulski, Comp. Phys. Com. 121–122, 586 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. Kutner, K.W. Kehr, W. Renz and R. Przeniosło, J.Phys. A 28, 923 (1995).CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A.E. Ezhov and A.Yu. Khrennikov, Phys. Rev. E 71, 016138 (2005).CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    K. Stalinas, Bose-Einstein condensation in classical systems cond-mat/0001347.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oleg V. Utyuzh
    • 1
  • Grzegorz Wilk
    • 2
  • Zbigniew Włodarczyk
    • 3
  1. 1.The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear StudiesWarsawPoland
  2. 2.The Andrzej Sołtan Institute for Nuclear StudiesWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Institute of Physicsświetokrzyska AcademyKielcePoland

Personalised recommendations