Advertisement

BIOGEOPHYSICS: THE EFFECTS OF MICROBIAL PROCESSES ON GEOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF THE SHALLOW SUBSURFACE

  • Estella A. Atekwana
  • D. Dale Werkema
  • Eliot A. Atekwana
Part of the NATO Science Series book series (NAIV, volume 71)

Abstract

The geologic record suggests the presence of microbes on Earth as early as the Precambrian (Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004). Microbes are involved in practically every aspect of earth evolution. The term microbe is a general descriptor for tiny organisms that individually are too small to be seen with the unaided eye. Microbes may include bacteria, archaea, fungi, and protists. Viruses are also included as a major type of microbe, although there is some debate whether viruses can be classified as living organisms. The role microbes play in altering environmental systems is well documented in many biogeochemical studies. Notable is the role of microbes in water-rock interactions (Chapelle and Bradley, 1997). Field observations and laboratory experiments suggest that bacteria can accelerate silicate weathering either by direct contact with minerals or by producing organic and inorganic acids that enhance the dissolution of silicates (Heibert and Bennett, 1992). Thus, microbes are able to directly alter mineral surface chemistry and pore water chemistry over short to geologic time scales. Microbial induced changes in water-rock-regolith environments over variable time scales cause changes in the physical properties of these environments that may be detected and measured using geophysical methodologies.

Keywords

Total Dissolve Solid Ground Penetrate Radar Microbial Process Most Probable Number Sand Column 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdel Aal, G.Z., E.A. Atekwana, L.D. Slater, and E.A. Atekwana, 2004. Effects of microbial processes on electrolytic and interfacial electrical properties of unconsolidated sediments, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31 (12), L12505, doi: 10.1029/2004GL020030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdel Aal, G.Z., L.D. Slater, and E.A. Atekwana, 2006. Induced-polarization measurements on unconsolidated sediments from a site of active hydrocarbon biodegradation, Geophys., 71, H13–H24, doi: 10.1190/1.2187760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aggarwal, P.K., and R.E. Hinchee, 1991. Monitoring in situ biodegradation of hydrocarbons by using carbon isotopes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 1178–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atekwana, E., E.A. Atekwana, R.S. Rowe, D.D. Werkema, Jr., and F.D. Legall, 2004a. The relationship of total dissolved solids measurements to the bulk electrical conductivity in an aquifer contaminated with hydrocarbon, J. Appl. Geophys., 56, 281–294.Google Scholar
  5. Atekwana, E.A., E.A. Atekwana, D.D. Werkema, J.P. Allen, L.A. Smart, J.W. Duris, D.P. Cassidy, W.A. Sauck, and S. Rossbach, 2004b. Evidence for microbial enhanced electrical conductivity in hydrocarbon-contaminated sediments, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L2350.Google Scholar
  6. Atekwana, E.A., W.A. Sauck, G.Z. Abdel Aal, and D.D. Werkema, Jr., 2002. Geophysical investigation of vadose zone conductivity anomalies at a hydrocarbon contaminated site: Implications for the assessment of intrinsic bioremediation, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 7 (3), 102–110.Google Scholar
  7. Atekwana, E.A., W.A. Sauck, and D.D. Werkema, Jr., 2000. Investigations of geoelectrical signatures at a hydrocarbon contaminated site, J. Appl. Geophys., 44, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Atekwana, E.A., D.D. Werkema, Jr., J.D. Duris , S. Rossbach , E.A. Atekwana, W.A. Sauck, D.P. Cassidy, J. Means, and F.D. Legall, 2004c. In situ apparent resistivity measurements and microbial population distribution at a hydrocarbon contaminated site: Implications for assessing natural attenuation, Geophysics, 69 (1), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balkwill, D.L., and D.R. Boone, 1997. Identity and diversity of microorganisms cultured from subsurface environments, in The Microbiology of the Terrestrial Deep Surface, edited by P.S. Amy and D.L. Haldeman, CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp. 105–117.Google Scholar
  10. Bekins, B., B.E. Rittmann, and J.A. Macdonald, 2001. Natural attenuation strategy for groundwater cleanup focuses on demonstrating cause and effect, Eos, Trans, Am. Geophys. Union, 82 (5), 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett, P.C., F.K. Hiebert, and W. Joo Choi, 1996. Microbial colonization and weathering of silicates in a petroleum-contaminated groundwater, Chem. Geol., 132, 45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bermejo, J.L., W.A. Sauck, and E.A. Atekwana, 1997. Geophysical discovery of a new lnapl plume at the former Wurtsmith Afb, Oscoda, Michigan, Ground Water Monit. Rem., 17 (4), 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bollinger, C., P. Hohener, D. Hunkeler, K. Haberli, and J. Zeyer, 1999. Intrinsic bioremediation of a petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer and assessment of mineralization based on stable carbon isotopes, Biodegradation, 10 (201), 217.Google Scholar
  14. Bouwer, E.J., H.H.M. Rijnaarts, A.B. Cunningham, and R. Gerlach, 2000. Biofilms in porous media, in Biofilms Ii: Process Analysis And Applications, edited by J.D. Bryers, Wiley-Liss, pp. 123–158.Google Scholar
  15. Bradford, J.H., 2003. GPR offset dependent reflectivity analysis for characterization of a high-conductivity lnapl plume, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (Sageep ’03), April 6–10, San Antonio, TX, pp. 238–252.Google Scholar
  16. Bryar, T.R., and R. Knight, 2002. Sensitivity of nuclear magnetic relaxation measurements to changing soil redox conditions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 2197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burton, M., E.A. Atekwana, and E. Atekwana, 2003. Mineral grain surface observations at hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer: Implications for the electrical properties of soils, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (Sageep’03), April 6–10, San Antonio, TX., pp. 271–280.Google Scholar
  18. Cassidy, D.P., D.D. Werkema, W.A. Sauck, E.A. Atekwana, S. Rossbach, and J. Duris, 2001. The effects of LNAPL biodegradation products on electrical conductivity measurements, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 6, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chapelle, F.H., and P.M. Bradley, 1997. Alteration of aquifer geochemistry by microorganisms, in Hurst, 56Hurst, C.J., G.R. Knudsen, M.J. McInerney, L.D. Stetzenbach, and M.V. Walter (eds.), Manual of Environmental Microbiology, American Society for Microbiology, pp. 558–564. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Cozzarelli, I.M., B.A. Bekins, M.J. Baedecker, G.R. Aiken, R.P. Eganhouse, and M.E. Tuccillo, 2001. Progression of natural attenuation processes at a crude oil spill site: I. Geochemical evolution of the plume, J. Contam. Hydrogeol., 53, 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dojka, M.A., P. Hugenholtz, S.K. Haack, and P. Norman, 1998. Microbial diversity in a hydrocarbon- and chlorinated-solvent-contaminated aquifer undergoing intrinsic bioremediation, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 3869–3877.Google Scholar
  22. Dunsmore, B.C., C.J Bass., and Lappin-ScottH.M., 2004. A novel approach to investigate biofilm accumulation and bacterial transport in porous matricies, Environ. Microbiol., 6 (2), 183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Duris, J.W., 2002. Microbial communicty structure in hydrocarbon impacted sediment associated with anomalous geophysical signatures, M.S.Thesis, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, 1–72.Google Scholar
  24. Gammack, S.M., E. Paterson, J. Kemp, M.S. Cresser, and K. Killham, 1992. Factors affecting the movement of microorganisms in soils, in Soil Biochemistry, edited by G. Stotzky and J.M. Bollag, Vol. 7, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 304–418.Google Scholar
  25. Goodman, A.E., and K.C. Marshall, 1995. Genetic responses of bacteria at surfaces, in Microbial Biofilms, edited by H.M. Lappin-Scott and J.W. Costerton, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 80–98.Google Scholar
  26. Hall-Stoodley, L., W.J. Costerton, and P. Stoodley, 2004. Bacterial biofilms: From the natural environment to infectious diseases, Nat. Rev./Microbiol., 2, 95–108, doi: 10.1038/nrmicro821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heibert, F.K., and P.C. Bennett, 1992. Microbial control of silicate weathering in organic-rich ground water, Science, 258, 278–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Legall, F.D., 2002. Geochemical and isotopic characteristics associated with high conductivities in a shallow hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer, Ph.D. Dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, 1–85.Google Scholar
  29. Lesmes, D.P., and K.M. Frye, 2001. Influence of pore fluid chemistry on the complex conductivity and induced polarization responses of Berea Sandstone, J. Geophys. Res., 106 (B3), 4079–4090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lovely, D.R., 1990. Magnetite Formation During Microbial Dissimilatory Iron Reduction, Iron Biominerals, edited by R.B. Frankel and R.P. Blakemore, Plenum, New York, pp. 151–166.Google Scholar
  31. Maier, R.M., I.L. Pepper, and C.P. Gerba, 2000. Environmental Microbiology, Academic , San Diego, CA, pp. 156–157.Google Scholar
  32. Mann, S., J. Webb, and R.J.P. Williams (eds), 1989. Biomineralization: Chemical and Biochemical Perspectives, VCH, New York, pp. 1–385.Google Scholar
  33. Marshall, K.C., 1976. Interfaces in Microbiol Ecology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 44–47.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, K.C., 1985. Mechanisms of bacterial adhesion at solid–water interfaces, in Bacterial Adhesion, edited by D.C. Savage and M. Fletcher, Plenum, New York, pp. 133–161.Google Scholar
  35. Marshall, K.C., 1992. Biofilms: An overview of bacterial adhesion, activity, and control at surfaces, Am. Soc. Microbiol. News, 58, 202–207.Google Scholar
  36. Mcmahon, P.B., D.A. Vroblesky, P.M. Bradely, F.H. Chapelle, and C.D. Gullet, 1995. Evidence for enhanced mineral dissolution in organic acid-rich shallow ground water, Ground Water, 33 (2), 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moskowitz, B.M., R.B. Frankel, and D.A. Bazylinski, 1993. Rock magnetic criteria for the detection of biogenic magnetite, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 120, 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naudet, V., A. Revil, J.Y. Bottero, and P. Begassat, 2003. Relationship between self-potential (sp) signals and redox conditions in contaminated groundwater, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30 (21), 2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Naudet, V., and A. Revil, 2005. A sandbox experiment to investigate bacteria-mediated redox processes on self-potential signals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, doi: 10.1029/2005gl022735.Google Scholar
  40. Newby, D.T., I.L. Pepper, and R.M. Maier, 2000. Microbial Transport in Environmental Microbiology, edited by R.M. Maier, I.L. Pepper, and C.P. Gerba, Academic, New York, 585 p.Google Scholar
  41. Ntarlagiannis, D., K.H. Williams, L.D. Slater, and S.S. Hubbard, 2005a. Low frequency electrical response to microbial induced sulfide precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 110, G02009, doi: 10.1029/2005JG000024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ntarlagiannis, D., N. Yee, L. Slater, and E.A. Atekwana, 2005b. Electrical measurements on microbial cells in suspension and in sand columns, Eos Trans. AGU, 86 (18), Jt. Assem. Suppl., May 23–27, Abstract Ns51b-06.Google Scholar
  43. Nyquist, J.E., and C.E. Corry, 2002. Self-potential: The ugly duckling of environmental geophysics, The Leading Edge, 21, 446–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park, D.H., and J.G. Zeikus, 2000. Electricity generation in microbial fuel cells using neutral red as an electronophore, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 66 (4), 1292–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Prodan, C., F. Mayo, J.R. Claycomb, J.H. Miller, and M.J. Benedik, 2004. Low frequency, low-field dielectric spectroscopy of living cell suspensions, J. Appl. Phys. 95 (7), 3754–3756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Redman, J.A., S. Walker, and M. Elimelech, 2004. Bacterial adhesion and transport in porous media: Role of the secondary energy minimum, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 1777–1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Robert, M., and C. Chenu, 1992. Interactions between soil minerals and microorganisms, in Soil Biochemistry, edited by G. Stotzky and J.M. Bollag, Vol. 7, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 307–418.Google Scholar
  48. Sauck, W.A., E.A. Atekwana, and M.S. Nash, 1998. High conductivities associated with an lnapl plume imaged by integrated geophysical techniques, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 2 (3), 203–212.Google Scholar
  49. Sauck, W.A., 2000. A conceptual model for the geoelectrical response of LNAPL plumes in granular sediments. J. Appl. Geophys., 44, 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shevnin, V., A. Mousatov, E. Nakamura-Labastida, O. Elgado-Rodriquez, J. Sanche-Osi, and H. Sanchez-Osio, 2003. Study of oil pollution in airports with resistivity sounding, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (Sageep 2003), San Antonio, TX., Paper Con02, pp. 180–189.Google Scholar
  51. Stoodley, P., R. Cargo, C.J. Rupp, S. Wilson, and I. Klapper, 2002. Biofilm mechanics and shear-induced deformation and detachment. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stumm, W., and J.J. Morgan, 1995. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natrual Waters, 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  53. Turco, R.F., and M. Sadowsky, 1995. The microfloral of bioremediation, in Bioremediation: Science and Applications, edited by H.D. Skipper and R.F. Turco, Special Publication No. 43, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI., pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
  54. Van Der Wal, A., M. Minor, W. Norde, A.J.B. Zehnder, and J. Lyklema, 1997a. Conductivity and dielectric dispersion of gram-positive bacterial cells, J. Colloidal Interfacial Sci., 186, 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van Der Wal, A., M. Minor, W. Norde, A.J.B. Zehnder, and J. Lylkema, 1997b. Electrokinetic potential of bacterial cells, Langmuir, 13, 165–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., J. Lyklema, A.J. Norde, and B. Zehnder, 1990. Influence of interfaces on microbial activity, Microbiol. Rev., 54, 75–87.Google Scholar
  57. Werkema, D.D., E.A. Atekwana, A.L. Endres, W.A. Sauck, and D.P. Cassidy, 2003. Investigating the geoelectrical response of hydrocarbon contamination undergoing biodegradation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30 (12), 1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williams, K H., D. Ntarlagiannis, L.D. Slater, P. Long, A. Dohnalkova, S.S. Hubbard, and J.F. Banfield, 2004. Remote sensing of subsurface microbial transformations, Eos Trans., AGU, Abstract B51f-01.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, K.H., D. Ntarlagiannis, L.D. Slater, A. Dohnalkova, S.S. Hubbard, and J.F. Banfield, 2005. Geophysical imaging of stimulated microbial mineralization, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 7592–7600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wolfaardt, G.M., J.R. Lawrence, R.D. Robarts, S.J. Caldwell, and D.E. Caldwell, 1994. Multicellular organization in a degradative biofilm community, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 60, 434–446.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Estella A. Atekwana
  • D. Dale Werkema
  • Eliot A. Atekwana

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations