Advertisement

European Students in the Periphery of the Bologna Process

  • James Cemmell
Part of the Higher Education Dynamics book series (HEDY, volume 12)

This chapter will discuss issues relating to the peripheral nature of ESIB within the Bologna Process regime. A question will be asked as to why exactly is ESIB a peripheral actor. ESIBs foray into the centre and the reasons why this can never be more than a fleeting visit will be explored as well as the structural form of the process and the power relations between the actors discussed. It will be asserted that constraints inherent within the process and the dominant actors intentions and logics dispel the myth that the European higher education area is undergoing a process of radical, open and free construction. Instead, what we are witnessing is the creation of a set of European influenced models utilising the tools that have real implications for students both within and without Europe as well as the societies and economies within which higher education (HE) sectors are based.

In short, what is at stake with the Bologna Process is far more than a simple enhanced student mobility scheme but the seeds of the structure of the European economic strategy interrelated with the fate of knowledge economy strategies across the globe and state activity across Europe.

Keywords

High Education High Education Institution High Education Sector European High Education Area Quality Assurance Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

7. References

  1. Berlin (2003) Realising the European Higher Education Area. Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September 2003.Google Scholar
  2. BIAC (2004) Discussion Paper to the OECD Meeting of Education Ministers on Raising the Quality of Learning for All. Meeting of OECD Education Ministers: Raising Quality for All, Ireland 18-19 March 2004, BIAC.Google Scholar
  3. Bologna (1999) Joint Declaration of the European Ministers of Education, Bologna 1999.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G. (2000) Speech to TUC, May 2000.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, K. (2000) Transnational Education Symposium ‘Who Benefits? Who Pays?’ 24th November 2000 Session Four, retrieved from http://www.umpa.unimelb.edu.au/publications/conference/Session%204%20eddoc5/5/04.
  6. Castells, M. (2000) The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture :The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Cerny, P. (1997) Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization, Government and Opposition, vol. 32 (2), pp. 251-274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Commission (2000) The Lisbon Special European Council (March 2000): Towards a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge, retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/cha/c10241.htm4/5/04.
  9. Commission (2003) Outcome of the Stakeholders’ Consultation “The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge” Resulting from COM(2003)58 of 5 February 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Commission (2004a) The Europe of Knowledge 2020 A vision for university based research and innovation, 25-28 April, Liege Convention Centre, Belgium.Google Scholar
  11. Commission (2004b) Erasmus Mundus, retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/mundus/index_en.html5/5/2004.
  12. Council (2000) Presidency Conclusions, Lisbon European Council, 23 and 24 March 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Dale, R. (2001) The Work of International Organisations: making national education systems part of the solution rather than part of the problem. Paper presented to international seminar of teacher trade unionism, October, Nicosia.Google Scholar
  14. Dale, R. (2003) The Lisbon Declaration, the Reconceptualisation of Governance and the Reconfiguration of European Educational Space. Paper presented to RAPPE seminar Governance, Regulation and Equity in European Education Systems Institute of Education, London University 20 March 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Dearing, R. (1997) Higher Education in the Learning Society, Inquiry into Higher Education. The National Commission, retrieved from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe/02/05/04.
  16. Fairclough, N. (2000) Language in the New Capitalism A new, revised, and enlarged version of the programmatic document for the LNC network. Posted 02/02/00, retrieved from http://www.cddc.vt.edu/host/lnc/lncarchive.html2/5/2004.2/5/2004.
  17. Fine, B. (2001) Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Granovetter, M. (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(November), pp. 481-510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harvey, L., Knight, P. T. (1996) Transforming Higher Education, Buckingham: Open University Press/SRHE.Google Scholar
  20. Hay, C., Watson M., Wincott, D. (2000) Globalisation, European Integration and the Persistence of European Social Models, Working Paper 3/99, POLSIS, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  21. Hay, C. (2001) What Place for Ideas in the Structure-Agency Debate? Globalisation as a ‘Process Without a Subject’, retrieved from the Web Site for Critical Realism 15/2/04.Google Scholar
  22. Hay, C., Rosamond, B. (2001) Globalisation, European Integration and the Discursive Construction of Economic Imperatives: A Question of Convergence? Queen’s Papers on Europeanisation No. 1/2001.Google Scholar
  23. Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., Perraton, J. (1999) Global Transformations: Politics, Economics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  24. Hudson, A. (1998) Towards a global geopolitical economy in Progress, in A. Kent (Ed.) Geography: Changing Viewpoints, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Kelsey, J. (2003) Legal Fetishism and the Contradictions of the GATS, Globalisation, Societies and Education, vol.1 (3).Google Scholar
  26. Knight, J. (2003) GATS, Trade and Higher Education Perspective 2003 Where are we? OBHE report May 2003, OBHE.Google Scholar
  27. Larsen, K., Morris, R., Martin, J. (2002) Trade in Educational Services: Trends and Emerging Issues, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. Lisbon (2000) Towards a Europe of Innovation and Knowledge, retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/scadplus/leg/en/cha/c10241.htm3/5/2004.
  29. Magalhaes, A., Stoer S. (2003), Performance, Citizenship and the Knowledge Society, Globalisation, Societies and Education, vol. 1 (1).Google Scholar
  30. Naidoo, R. (2003) Repositioning Higher Education as a Global Commodity: opportunities and challenges for future sociology of education work, British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24 (2).Google Scholar
  31. OECD (2002) OECD Council at Ministerial Level, 15-16 May 2002, OECD.Google Scholar
  32. Pagani, F. (2002) Peer Review: a too for co-operation and change. An Analysis of an OECD Working Method, JT00131206, OECD.Google Scholar
  33. Prague (2001) Towards the European Higher Education Area, Prague, 2001.Google Scholar
  34. QAA (2004) Overseas Collaborative provision reports. QAA Retrieved 3/5/2004.Google Scholar
  35. Santos, B. (2003) World Social Forum, paper delivered at the XXIV International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Dallas, USA, March 27-29, 2003.Google Scholar
  36. Scholte, J. (2002) What Is Globalization? The Definitional Issue - Again. CSGR Working Paper No. 109/02 December 2002.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, N., Hay, C. (2004) Third Way Political Economy, Globalisation and Economic Compulsion: A Comparative Analysis of the UK and Ireland. Paper prepared for presentation at the Conference of Europeanists’ Annual Conference, Palmer Hilton Hotel, Chicago 11-13 March 2004.Google Scholar
  38. Solow, R. (1956) A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70, No 1, 65-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Theisens, H. (2004) The State of Change. Analysing Policy Change in Dutch and English Higher Education, University of Twente, Center for Higher Education and Policy Studies (CHEPS).Google Scholar
  40. Tickell, A., Peck, J. A. (2002) Making global rules: globalisation and neoliberalisation? In: J. Peck and H. W.-C. Yeung (Eds.) Making global connections, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Tomusk, V. (2004) Three Bolognas and a Pizza Pie: Notes on Institutionalization of the European Higher Education System, International Studies in Sociology of Education, vol. 14 (1).Google Scholar
  42. University of Luton (2004) Mission Statement, retrieved from http://www.luton.ac.uk/foi2005/1gov/4cont/mission.pdf5/5/2004.
  43. UniversitiesUK (2004) Who we are, retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/4/5/2004.
  44. Van Damme, D. (2001), Quality issues in the internationalisation of higher education, Higher Education, 41, pp. 415-441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williams, G., Coate, K. (2004) The United Kingdom. In: J. Huisman and M. van der Wende (Eds.) On Cooperation and Competition: National and European Policies for the  Internationalisation of Higher Education. Bonn: Lemmens.Google Scholar
  46. Williamson, J. (1990) What Washington Means by Policy Reform, from Chapter 2 of Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened? Institute for International Economics, retrieved from http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/williamson1102-2.htm2/5/2004.
  47. WTO (1999), The Legal Texts: The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • James Cemmell
    • 1
  1. 1.The National Unions of Students in EuropeEurope

Personalised recommendations