Kinship Networks and Intergenerational Transfers

  • C. Y. Cyrus Chu
  • Ruoh-Rong Yu
Part of the International Studies In Population book series (ISIP, volume 3)

Most existing literature on intergenerational transfers in the West focuses on downward transfers from parents to children. Two strands of studies have been developed in the past decade. One strand emphasizes inter vivos transfers while the other strand looks at postmortem bequests.

As described in various sources, in oriental societies child-to-parent transfers may be more essential than that from parent to child. The Taiwan Elderly Survey conducted in 2000 shows that more than 47 percent of the elderly rely on financial support from their children to sustain their living. Another island-wide survey entitled Panel Study of Family Dynamics (PSFD) shows a similar pattern. Among interviewees (aged 36–65) surveyed in 1999-2000 by PSFD, 53 percent reported that they provided financial transfers to their parents regularly, while only less than 5 percent received financial transfers from their parents.


Percent Level Kinship Network Intergenerational Transfer Monetary Transfer Living Parent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altonji, J.G., Hayashi, F. and Kotlikoff, L.J. (1997), “Parental altruism and inter vivos transfers: Theory and evidence.” Journal of Political Economy, 105:1121–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becker, G.S. (1974), “A Theory of social interactions.” Journal of Political Economy, 82:1063–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernheim, B.D., Shleifer, A. and Summers, L.H. (1985), “The strategic bequest motive.” Journal of Political Economy, 93:1045–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bott, E. (1968), Family and Social Network: Roles, Norms and External Relationships in Ordinary Families. Tavistock Publications: London.Google Scholar
  5. Chan, C.-N. (1990), Families and Society. Linking Publications (in Chinese): Taipei.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, D. (1987), “Motives for private income transfers.” Journal of Political Economy, 95:508–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cox,D., Eser, Z. and Jimenez, E. (1998), “Motives for private transfers over the life cycle: An analytical framework and evidence for Peru.” Journal of Development Economics, 55:57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freeman, R., Thornton, A. and Yang, L.-S. (1994), “Determinants of coresidence in extended households.” In: Social Changes and the Family in Taiwan, A. Thornton and H.-S. Lin, eds. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Kandel, E. and Lazear, E.P. (1992), “Peer pressure and partnership.” Journal of Political Economy, 100:801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kotlikof, L.J. and Spivak, A. (1981), “The family as an incomplete annuities market.” Journal of Political Economy, 89:372–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Laitner, J. (1997), “Intergenerational and intrahousehold economic links.” In: Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Vol. 1, A. M. R. Rosenzweig and O. Stark, eds. North-Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Lindbeck, A. (1997) “Incentives and social norms in household behavior.” American Economic Review, 87:370–377.Google Scholar
  13. Lindbeck, A., Nyberg, S. andWeibull, J.W. (1999), “Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114:1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Perozek, M.G. (1998), “A reexamination of the strategic bequest motive.” Journal of Political Economy, 106:423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rivers, D. and Vuong, Q.H. (1988), “Limited information estimators and exogeneity tests for simultaneous probit models.” Journal of Econometrics, 39:347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sung, L.-S. (1974), Inheritance and Kinship in North Taiwan. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  17. Vella, F. (1993), “A simple estimator for simultaneous models with censored endogenous regressors.” International Economic Review, 34:441–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weinstein, M., Sun, T.-H., Chang, M.-C. and Freedman, R. (1990), “Household composition, extended kinship, and reproduction in Taiwan: 1965–1985.” Population Studies, 44:217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Weinstein, M., Sun, T.-H., Chang, M.-C. and Freedman, R. (1994), “Co-residence and other ties linking couples and their parents.” In: Social Changes and the Family in Taiwan, A. Thornton and H.-S. Lin, eds. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Wilhelm, M.O. (1996), “Bequest behavior and the effect of heirs’ earnings: Testing the altruistic model of bequests.” American Economic Review, 86:874–892.Google Scholar
  21. Wellman, B. (1990), “The place of kinfolk in personal community networks.” Marriage and Family Review, 15:195–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yeh, K.-H. (1994), “Living arrangement of elderly parents in Taiwan: A psychological perspective.” Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 83:121–168 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Y. Cyrus Chu
    • 1
  • Ruoh-Rong Yu
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of EconomicsAcademia SinicaTaiwan
  2. 2.Center for Survey ResearchAcademia SinicaTaiwan

Personalised recommendations