Understanding the Benefits and Costs of Urban Forest Ecosystems

  • David J. Nowak
  • John F. Dwyer


Tree Cover Urban Forest Pollution Removal Urban Tree Urban Vegetation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akbari, H., Davis, S., Dorsano, S., Huang, J., and Winnett, S., 1992, Cooling Our Communities: A Guidebook on Tree Planting and Light-colored Surfacing, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. Akbari, H., Huang, J., Martien, P., Rainier, L., Rosenfeld, A., and Taha, H., 1988, The impact of summer heat islands on cooling energy consumption and CO2 emissions, in Proceedings of the 1988 Summer Study in Energy Efficiency in Buildings, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, L. M., and Cordell, H. K., 1988, Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (USA): A survey based on actual sales prices, Landscape Urban Plann. 15:153–164.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, L. M., Mulligan, B. E., and Goodman, L. S., 1984, Effects of vegetation on human response to sound, J. Arboric. 10(2):45–49.Google Scholar
  5. Aylor, D. E., 1972, Noise reduction by vegetation and ground, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51(1):197–205.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, M. T., Sudol, M., Bloch, L., and Winer, A. M., 1996, Low-emitting urban forests: A taxonomic methodology for assigning isoprene and monoterpene emission rates, Atmos. Environ. 30(9):1437–1452.Google Scholar
  7. Birdsey, R. A., and Heath, L. S., 1995, Carbon changes in US forests, in Climate Change and the Productivity of America’s Forests, (L. A. Joyce, ed.), Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-271, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 56–70.Google Scholar
  8. Bloniarz, D. V., and Ryan, H. D. P., 1996, The use of volunteer initiatives in conducting urban forest inventories, J. Arboric. 22(2):75–82.Google Scholar
  9. Brasseur, G. P., and Chatfield, R. B., 1991, The fate of biogenic trace gases in the atmosphere, in Trace Gas Emissions by Plants (T. D. Sharkey, E. A. Holland, and H. A. Mooney, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, T. L., Dawson, C. P., and Miller, R. C., 1979, Interests and attitudes of metropolitan New York residents about wildlife, Trans. 44th North. Am. Wildl. and Nat. Resour. Conf. 44:289–297.Google Scholar
  11. Cackowski, J. M., and Nassar, J. L., 2003, The restorative effects of nature: Implications for driver anger and frustration, Env. Behav. 25:736–751.Google Scholar
  12. Cardelino, C. A., and Chameides, W. L., 1990, Natural hydrocarbons, urbanization, and urban ozone, J. Geophys. Res. 95(D9):13, 971–13, 979.Google Scholar
  13. Chicago Wilderness website at, Last accessed May, 2005.
  14. Chenoweth, R. E., and Gobster, P. H., 1990, The nature and ecology of aesthetic experiences in the landscape, Landscape J. 9:1–18.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, D. I., 1978, Trees, solid barriers, and combinations: Alternatives for noise control, in Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry. Conference (G. Hopkins, ed.), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, pp. 330–339.Google Scholar
  16. Cook, D. I., and Van Haverbeke, D. F., 1971, Trees and shrubs for noise abatement, in Res. Bull., vol. 246, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station, Lincoln.Google Scholar
  17. Corrill, M., Lillydahl, J., and Single, L., 1978, The effects of greenbelts on residential property values: Some findings on the political economy of open space, Land Econ. 54:207–217.Google Scholar
  18. Council of Tree and Landscape Appraisers, 2000, Guide for Plant Appraisal, International Society of Arboriculture, Urbana, IL.Google Scholar
  19. Crompton, J. L., 2004, The Proximate Principle: The Impact of Parks, Open Space and Water Features on Residential Property Values and the Property Tax Base, National Recreation and Park Association, Ashburn, VA, 184pp. plus appendix.Google Scholar
  20. De Sousa, C. A., 2003, Turning brownfields into green space in the City of Toronto, Env. Behav. 63:181–198.Google Scholar
  21. DeGraff, R. M., and Payne, B. R., 1975, Economic values of nongame birds and some research needs, Trans. North. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 40:281–287.Google Scholar
  22. Dombrow, J., Rodriquez, M., and Sirmans, C. F., 2000, The market value of mature trees in single family housing markets, Apprais. J. 68: 39–43.Google Scholar
  23. Dwyer, J. F., 1991, Economic value of urban trees, in A National Research Agenda for Urban Forestry in the 1990’s, International Society of Arboriculture, Urbana, IL, pp. 27–32.Google Scholar
  24. Dwyer, J. F., 1995, The significance of trees and their management in built environments, in Trees and Building Sites: Proceedings of an International Conference held in the Interest of Developing a Scientific Basis for Managing Trees in Proximity to Buildings (G. Watson, and D. Neely, eds.), International Society of Arboriculture, Savoy, IL, pp. 3–11.Google Scholar
  25. Dwyer, J. F., Nowak, D. J., Noble, M. H., and Sisinni, S. M., 2000, Assessing our Nation’s Urban Forests: Connecting People with Ecosystems in the 21st Century, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-460, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  26. Dwyer, J. F., and Schroeder, H. W., 1994, The human dimensions of urban forestry, J. For. 92(10):12–15.Google Scholar
  27. Dwyer, J. F., Schroeder, H. W., and Gobster, P. H., 1991, The significance of urban trees and forests: Toward a deeper understanding of values, J. Arboric. 17:276–284.Google Scholar
  28. Dwyer, J. F., Schroeder, H. W., Louviere, J. J., and Anderson, D. H., 1989, Urbanites willingness to pay for trees and forests in recreation areas, J. Arboric. 15(10):247–252.Google Scholar
  29. Dwyer, J. F., McPherson, E. G., Schroeder, H. W., and Rowntree, R. A., 1992, Assessing the benefits and costs of the urban forest, J. Arboric. 18(5):227–234.Google Scholar
  30. East Bay Hills Vegetation Management Consortium, 1995, Fire Hazard Mitigation Program and Fuel Management Plan for the East Bay Hills, Report prepared by Amphion Environmental, Inc., Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
  31. Feldman, R., and Westphal, L., 1999, Restoring participatory design and planning: Incorporating community empowerment as a tool for social justice, Places 12(2):34–37.Google Scholar
  32. Guenther, A., Zimmerman, P., and Wildermuth, M., 1994, Natural volatile organic compound emission rate estimates for US woodland landscapes, Atmos. Environ. 28(6):1197–1210.Google Scholar
  33. Hammitt, W. E., 2002, Urban forests and parks as privacy refuges, J. Arboric. 28(1):19–26.Google Scholar
  34. Heisler, G. M., 1986, Energy savings with trees, J. Arboric. 12(5):113–125.Google Scholar
  35. Heisler, G. M., 1990a, Mean wind speed below building height in residential neighborhoods with different tree densities, ASHRAE Trans. 96(1):1389–1396.Google Scholar
  36. Heisler, G. M., 1990b, Tree plantings that save energy, in Proceedings of the 4th Fourth National Urban Forestry Conference (P. Rodbell, ed.), American Forestry Association, Washington, DC, pp. 58–62.Google Scholar
  37. Heisler, G. M., Grant, R. H., Grimmond, S., and Souch, C., 1995, Urban forests’ cooling our communities?, in Proceedings of the Seventh National Urban Forestry Conference (C. Kollin, and M. Barratt, eds.), American Forests, Washington, DC, pp. 31–34.Google Scholar
  38. Howenstine, W. L., 1993, Urban forests as part of the whole ecosystem, in Proceedings of the 6th National Urban Forestry Conference (C. Kollin, J. Mahon, and L. Frame, eds.), American Forests, Washington, DC, pp. 118–120.Google Scholar
  39. Hull, R. B., 1992a, Brief encounters with urban forests produce moods that matter, J. Arboric. 18(6):322–324.Google Scholar
  40. Hull, R. B., 1992b, How the public values urban forests, J. Arboric. 18(2):98–101.Google Scholar
  41. Jackson, L. E., 2003, The relationship of urban design to human health and condition, Landscape Urban Plan. 64:191–200.Google Scholar
  42. Kaplan, R., 1993, Urban forestry and the workplace, in Managing Urban and High Use Recreation Settings (P. H. Gobster, ed.), Gen. Tech. Rep. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, NC-163, St. Paul, MN, pp. 41–45.Google Scholar
  43. Kaplan, R., and Kaplan, S., 1989, The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Approach, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  44. Kramer, P. J., and Kozlowski, T. T., 1979, Physiology of Woody Plants, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Kuo, F. E., 2003, The role of arboriculture in healthy social ecology, J. Arboric. 29(3):148–155.Google Scholar
  46. Kuo, F. E., Bacaicoa, M., and Sullivan, W. C., 1998, Transforming inner-city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference, Enviorn. Behav. 30(1):28–59.Google Scholar
  47. Kuo, F. E., and Sullivan, W. C., 2001a, Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?, Enviorn. Behav. 33(3):343–365.Google Scholar
  48. Kuo, F. E., and Sullivan, W. C., 2001b, Aggression and violence in the inner city: Impacts of environment via mental fatigue, Enviorn. Behav. 33(4):543–571.Google Scholar
  49. Lenschow, D. H. (ed.), 1986, Probing the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  50. Librett, J., Yore, M., Buchner, D. M., and Schmid, T. L., 2005, Take pride in America’s health: Volunteering as a gateway to physical activity, Am J. Health Ed. 36(1):8–13.Google Scholar
  51. Luley, C. J., and Bond, J., 2002, A Plan to Integrate Management of Urban Trees into Air Quality Planning, Report to Northeast State Foresters Association, Davey Resource Group, Kent, OH, 73pp.Google Scholar
  52. Luttik, J., 2000, The value of trees, water, and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands, Landscape Urban Plan. 48:161–167.Google Scholar
  53. Lyons, J. R., 1982, Nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the US: Identifying the other constituency, Trans. North. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 47:677–685.Google Scholar
  54. McPherson, E. G., 1987, Effects of Vegetation on Building Energy Performance, Ph.D. Discussion, SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  55. McPherson, E. G., and Dougherty, E., 1989, Selecting trees for shade in the Southwest, J. Arboric. 15:35–43.Google Scholar
  56. McPherson, E. G., 1998, Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento’s urban forest, J. Arboric. 24(4):215–223.Google Scholar
  57. Michael, S. E., and Hull, R. B., 1995, Effects of vegetation on crime in urban parks, Arborist News, February, p. 45.Google Scholar
  58. Morales, D. J., Micha, R. R., and Weber, R. L., 1983, Two methods of valuating trees on residential sites, J. Arboric. 9:21–24.Google Scholar
  59. More, T. A., Stevens, T., and Allen, P. G., 1988, Valuation of urban parks, Landscape Urban Plan. 15:139–152.Google Scholar
  60. Murray, F. J., Marsh, L., and Bradford, P. A., 1994, New York State Energy Plan, Vol. II: Issue Reports, New York State Energy Office, Albany.Google Scholar
  61. Myrup, L. O., McGinn, C. E., and Flocchini, R. G., 1991, An analysis of microclimate variation in a suburban environment, in Seventh Conference of Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, pp. 172–179.Google Scholar
  62. Neville, L. R., 1996, Urban Watershed Management: The Role of Vegetation, Ph.D. Discussions., SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.Google Scholar
  63. Nowak, D. J., 1993a, Atmospheric carbon reduction by urban trees, J. Environ. Manage. 37(3):207–217.Google Scholar
  64. Nowak, D. J., 1993b, Compensatory value of an urban forest: An application of tree-value formula, J. Arboric. 19(3):173–177.Google Scholar
  65. Nowak, D. J., 1993c, Historical vegetation change in Oakland and its implications for urban forest management, J. Arboric. 19(5):313–319.Google Scholar
  66. Nowak, D. J., 1994a, Air pollution removal by Chicago’s urban forest, in Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project (E. G. McPherson, D. J. Nowak, and R. A. Rowntree, eds.), Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
  67. Nowak, D. J., 1994b, Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Chicago’s urban forest, in Chicago’s Urban Forest Ecosystem: Results of the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project (E. G. McPherson, D. J. Nowak, and R. A. Rowntree, eds.), Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-186, USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Radnor, PA, pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
  68. Nowak, D. J., 1995, Trees pollute? A “TREE” explains it all, in Proceedings 7th National Urban Forestry Conference (C. Kollin, and M. Barratt, eds.), American Forests, Washington, DC, pp. 28–30.Google Scholar
  69. Nowak, D. J., Civerolo, K. L., Rao, S. T., Sistla, S., Luley, C. J., and Crane, D. E., 2000, A modeling study of the impact of urban trees on ozone, Atmos. Environ. 34:1601–1613.Google Scholar
  70. Nowak, D. J., and Crane, D. E., 2000, The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Quantifying urban forest structure and functions, in Proceedings of the Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century, IUFRO Conference, 16–20 August 1998, Boise, ID (M. Hansen, and T. Burk eds.), Gen. Tech. Rep.NC-212, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station, St. Paul, MN, pp. 714–720.Google Scholar
  71. Nowak, D. J., and Crane, D. E., 2002, Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA, Environ. Poll. 116(3):381–389.Google Scholar
  72. Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., and Dwyer, J. F., 2002a, Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States, J. Arboric. 28(4):194–199.Google Scholar
  73. Nowak, D. J., Crane, D. E., Stevens, J. C., and Ibarra, M., 2002b, Brooklyn’s Urban Forest, Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-290, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA.Google Scholar
  74. Nowak, D. J., and McBride, J. R., 1992, Differences in Monterey pine pest populations in urban and natural forests, For. Ecol. Manage. 50:133–144.Google Scholar
  75. Nowak, D. J., Noble, M. H., Sisinni, S. M., and Dwyer, J. F., 2001a, Assessing the US urban forest resource, J. For. 99(3):37–42.Google Scholar
  76. Nowak, D. J., Pasek, J., Sequeira, R., Crane, D. E., and Mastro, V., 2001b, Potential effect of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) on urban trees in the United States, J. Econom. Entomol. 94(1):116–122.Google Scholar
  77. Nowak, D. J., and Rowntree, R. A., 1990, History and range of Norway maple, J. Arboric. 16(11):291–296.Google Scholar
  78. Nowak, D. J., McHale P. J., Ibarra, M., Crane, D., Stevens, J., and Luley, C., 1998, Modeling the effects of urban vegetation on air pollution, in Air Pollution Modeling and Its Application XII (S. Gryning, and N. Chaumerliac, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 399–407.Google Scholar
  79. Nowak, D. J., Stevens, J. C., Sisinni, S. M., and Luley C. J., 2002c, Effects of urban tree management and species selection on atmospheric carbon dioxide, J. Arboric. 28(3):113–122.Google Scholar
  80. Nowak, D. J., Walton, J. T., Dwyer, J. F., Kaya, L. G., and Myeong, S., 2005, The increasing influence of urban environments on US forest management, J. Forestry 103(8): 377–382.Google Scholar
  81. Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., Ulrich, R. S., Hebl, M. R., and Grossman-Alexander, M., 1998, The view from the road: Implications for stress recovery and immunization, J. Enviorn. Psych. 18(2):113–140.Google Scholar
  82. Reethof, G., and McDaniel, O. H., 1978, Acoustics and the urban forest, in Proceedings of the National Urban Forestry Conference (G. Hopkins, ed.), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY, pp. 321–329.Google Scholar
  83. Robinette, G. O., 1972, Plants/People/ and Environmental Quality, USDI National Park Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  84. Rodriquez, M., and Sirmans, C. F., 1994, Quantifying the value of a view in single-family housing markets, Apprais. J., 62(4): 600–603.Google Scholar
  85. Rolfe, G. L., 1974, Lead distribution in tree rings, For. Sci. 20(3):283–286.Google Scholar
  86. Sanders, R. A., 1986, Urban vegetation impacts on the urban hydrology of Dayton Ohio, Urban Ecol. 9:361–376.Google Scholar
  87. Schroeder, H. W., and Anderson, L. M., 1984, Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites, J. Leis. Res. 16(2):178–194.Google Scholar
  88. Schroeder, H. W., 1989, Environment, behavior, and design research on urban forests, in Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design (E. H. Zube, and G. L. Moore, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 87–107.Google Scholar
  89. Schroeder, H. W., 1991, Preference and meaning of arboretum landscapes: Combining quantitative and qualitative data, J. Environ. Psych. 11:231–248.Google Scholar
  90. Schroeder, H. W., and Anderson, L. M., 1984, Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites, J. Leisure Res. 16:178–194.Google Scholar
  91. Schroeder, H. W., 2002, Experiencing nature in special places, J. For. 100(5):8–14.Google Scholar
  92. Schroeder, H. W., 2004. Special Places in the Lake Calumet Area, USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, General Technical Report 249, St Paul MN, 23pp.Google Scholar
  93. Scott, K. I., Simpson, J. R., and McPherson, E. G., 1999, Effects of tree cover on parking lot microclimate and vehicle emissions, J. Arboric. 25(3):129–142.Google Scholar
  94. Selia, A. F., and Anderson, L. M., 1982, Estimating costs of tree preservation on residential lots, J. Arboric. 8:182–185.Google Scholar
  95. Selia, A. F., and Anderson, L. M., 1984, Estimating tree preservation costs on urban residential lots in metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia For. Res. Pap. No. 48. MACON, 6A. 6pp.Google Scholar
  96. Sharkey, T. D., and Singsaas, E. L., 1995, Why plants emit isoprene, Nature 374(27 April):769.Google Scholar
  97. Shaw, W. W., Magnum, W. R., and Lyons, J. R., 1985, Residential enjoyment of wildlife resources by Americans, Leisure Sci. 7:361–375.Google Scholar
  98. Smith, W. H., 1990, Air Pollution and Forests, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  99. Sommer, R., Learey, F., Summit, J., and Tirell, M., 1994a, Social benefits of resident involvement in tree planting: Compressions with developer-planted trees, J. Arboric. 20(6):323–328.Google Scholar
  100. Sommer, R., Learey, F., Summitt, J., Tirrell, M., 1994b, Social benefits of residential involvement in tree planting, J. Arboric. 20(3):170–175.Google Scholar
  101. Sommer, R., Summitt, J., Learey, R., and Tirrell, M., 1995, Social and educational benefits of a community shade tree program: A replication, J. Arboric. 21(5):260.Google Scholar
  102. Sommer, R., 2003, Trees and human identity, in Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (S. Clayton, and S. Opotow, eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge and London, pp. 179–204.Google Scholar
  103. Sullivan, W. C., and Kuo, F. E., 1996, Do trees strengthen urban communities, reduce domestic violence? Arbor. News 5(2):33–34.Google Scholar
  104. Souch, C. A., and Souch, C., 1993, The effect of trees on summertime below canopy urban climates: A case study, Bloomington, Indiana, J. Arboric. 19(5):303–312.Google Scholar
  105. Sydor, T., Bowker, J. M., Newman, D. H., and Cordell, H. K., 2005, Valuing Trees in a Residential Setting: Revisiting Athens, Clarke County, Georgia, draft paper, 15pp.Google Scholar
  106. Taha, H., 1996, Modeling impacts of increased urban vegetation on ozone air quality in the South Coast Air Basin, Atmos. Environ. 30(20):3423–3430.Google Scholar
  107. Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., and Sullivan, W. C., 2001a, Coping with ADD: The surprising connection to green play settings, Enviorn. Behav. 33(1):54–77.Google Scholar
  108. Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., and Sullivan, W. C., 2001b, Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner-city children, J. Enviorn. Psych. 21:49–63.Google Scholar
  109. Thompson, R., Hanna, R., Noel, J., and Piirto, D., 1999, Valuation of tree aesthetics on small urban-interface properties, J. Arboric. 25(5):225–234.Google Scholar
  110. Tingey, D. T., Turner, D. P., and Weber, J. A., 1991, Factors controlling the emissions of monoterpenes and other volatile organic compounds, in Trace Gas Emissions by Plants (T. D. Sharkey, E. A. Holland, and H. A. Mooney, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 93–119.Google Scholar
  111. Ulrich, R. S., 1984, View through a window may influence recovery from surgery, Science, 224:420–421.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. US Environmental Protection Agency, 1991, Nonroad engine and vehicle emission study report, USEPA Office of Air and Radiation ANR-43. EPA-21A–2001, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  113. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2004, Incorporating Emerging and Voluntary Measures in a State Implementation Plan (SIP), USEPA Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.Google Scholar
  114. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2000, Introduction to Phytoremediation, US EPA Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  115. VanDruff, L. W., Leedy, D. L., and Stearns, F. W., 1995, Urban wildlife and human well-being, in Urban Ecology as the Basis of Urban Planning (H. Sukopp, M. Numata, and A. Huber, eds.), SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp. 203–211.Google Scholar
  116. Wells, N. M., 2000, At home with nature: Effects of “greening” on children’s cognitive functioning, Enviorn. Behav. 32(5):775–795.Google Scholar
  117. Westphal, L. M., 1993, Why trees? Urban forestry volunteers values and motivations, in Managing Urban and High Use Recreation Settings (P. H. Gobster, ed.), Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-163, USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, MN, pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
  118. Westphal, L. M., 1999, Empowering people through urban greening projects: Does it happen? in Proceedings of the 1999 National Urban Forestry Conference (C. Kollin, ed.), American Forests, Washington, D.C, pp. 60–63.Google Scholar
  119. Westphal, L. M., and Isebrands, J. G., 2001, Phytoremediation of Chicago’s brownfields: Consideration of ecological approaches to social issues, in Brownfields 2001 Proceedings, Chicago IL,–02.pdf, Last accessed April, 2005.
  120. Westphal, L. M., 2003, Urban greening and social benefits: A study of empowerment outcomes, J. Arboric. 29(3):137–147.Google Scholar
  121. Wolf, K. L., 2003a, Public response to the urban forest in inner-city business districts, J. Arboric. 29(3):117–126.Google Scholar
  122. Wolf, K. L., 2003b, Freeway roadside management: The urban forest beyond the white line, J. Arboric. 29(3):127–136.Google Scholar
  123. Wolf, K. L., 2004, Trees and business district preferences: A case study of Athens, Georgia US, J. Arboric. 30(6):336–346.Google Scholar
  124. Yeomans, J. A., and Barclay, J. S., 1981, Perceptions of residential wildlife programs, Trans. North. Am. Wildl. Nat. Resour. Conf. 46:390–395.Google Scholar
  125. Ziegler, I., 1973, The effect of air–polluting gases on plant metabolism, in Environmental Quality and Safety, vol. 2, Academic Press, New York, pp. 182–208.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Nowak
    • 1
  • John F. Dwyer
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA Forest ServiceNortheastern Research StationSyracuseUSA
  2. 2.USDA Forest ServiceNorth Central Research StationEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations