QUANTUM VS CLASSICAL CALOGERO–MOSER SYSTEMS
Conference paper
Abstract
Calogero–Moser and Toda systems are best known examples of solvable many-particle dynamics on a line which are based on root systems. At the classical level, the former (C–M) is integrable for elliptic potentials (Weierstraβ β function) and their various degenerations.
Keywords
Root System Simple Root Coxeter Group Dominant Weight Algebraic Construction
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Calogero, F. (1971) J. Math. Phys. 12, pp. 419–436.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 2.Sutherland, B. (1972) Phys. Rev. A5, pp. 1372–1376.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 3.Moser, J. (1975) Adv. Math. 16, pp. 197–220; Lecture Notes in Physics 38, (1975), Springer-Verlag; Calogero, F., Marchioro C., and Ragnisco, O. (1975) Lett. Nuovo Cim. 13, pp. 383–387; Calogero, F. (1975) Lett. Nuovo Cim. 13, pp. 411–416.MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
- 4.Olshanetsky, M. A. and Perelomov, A. M. (1976) Inventions Math. 37, pp. 93–108.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 5.Olshanetsky, M. A. and Perelomov, A. M. (1983) Phys. Rep. 94, pp. 313–404.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 6.Khastgir, S. P., Pocklington, A. J., and Sasaki, R. (2000) J. Phys. A33, pp. 9033–9064.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 7.Bordner, A. J., Corrigan, E., and Sasaki, R. (1998) Prog. Theor. Phys. 100, pp. 1107–1129; Bordner, A. J., Sasaki, R., and Takasaki, K. (1999) Prog. Theor. Phys. 101, pp. 487–518; Bordner, A. J. and Sasaki, R. (1999) Prog. Theor. Phys. 101, pp. 799–829; Khastgir, S. P., Sasaki R., and Takasaki, K. (1999) Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, pp. 749–776.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.Bordner, A. J., Corrigan, E., and Sasaki, R. (1999) Prog. Theor. Phys. 102, pp. 499–529.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.D’Hoker, E. and Phong, D. H. (1998) Nucl. Phys. B530, pp. 537–610.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 10.Bordner, A. J., Manton, N. S., and Sasaki, R. (2000) Prog. Theor. Phys. 103, pp. 463–487.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dunkl, C. F. (1989) Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 311, pp. 167–183; Buchstaber, V. M., Felder, G., and Veselov, A. P. (1994) Duke Math. J. 76, pp. 885–911.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 12.Khastgir, S. P. and Sasaki, R. (2001) Phys. Lett. A279, pp. 189–193; Hurtubise, J. C. and Markman, E. (2001) Comm. Math. Phys. 223, pp. 533–552.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 13.Corrigan, E. and Sasaki, R. (2002) J. Phys. A35, pp. 7017–7061.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Haldane, F. D. M. (1988) Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, pp. 635–638; Shastry, B. S. (1988) ibid 60, pp. 639–642.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 15.Inozemtsev, V. I. and Sasaki, R. (2001) J. Phys. A34, pp. 7621–7632.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 16.Inozemtsev, V. I. and Sasaki, R. (2001) Nucl. Phys. B618, pp. 689–698.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.Olshanetsky, M. A. and Perelomov, A. M. (1977) Funct. Anal. Appl. 12, pp. 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Perelomov, A. M. (1971) Theor. Math. Phys. 6, pp. 263–282.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 19.Wojciechowski, S. (1976) Lett. Nuouv. Cim. 18, pp. 103–107; Phys. Lett. A95, (1983) pp. 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lassalle, M. (1991) Acad. C. R. Sci. Paris, t. Sér. I Math. 312, pp. 425–428, 725–728, 313, pp. 579–582.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 21.Polykronakos, A. P. (1992) Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, pp. 703–705.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 22.Shastry, B. S. and Sutherland, B. (1993) Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, pp. 4029–4033.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 23.Brink, L., Hansson, T. H., and Vasiliev, M. A. (1992) Phys. Lett. B286, pp. 109–111; Brink, L., Hansson, T. H., Konstein, S., and Vasiliev, M. A. (1993) Nucl. Phys. B401, pp. 591–612; Brink, L., Turbiner, A., and Wyllard, N. (1998) J. Math. Phys. 39, pp. 1285–1315.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 24.Ujino, H., Wadati, M., and Hikami, K. (1993) J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 62, pp. 3035–3043; Ujino, H. and Wadati, M. (1996) J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, pp. 2423–2439; Ujino, H. (1995) J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 64, pp. 2703–2706; Nishino, A., Ujino, H., and Wadati, M. Chaos Solitons Fractals (2000) 11, pp. 657–674.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 25.Sogo, K. (1996) J. Phys. Soc. Jpn 65, pp. 3097–3099; Gurappa, N. and Panigrahi, P. K. (1999) Phys. Rev. B59, pp. R2490–R2493.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ruijsenaars, S. N. M. (1999) CRM Series in Math. Phys. 1, pp. 251–352, Springer.Google Scholar
- 27.Calogero, F. (1977) Lett. Nuovo Cim. 19, pp. 505–507; Lett. Nuovo Cim. 22, (1977) pp. 251–253; Lett. Nuovo Cim. 24, (1979) pp. 601–604; J. Math. Phys. 22, (1981) pp. 919–934.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Calogero, F. and Perelomov, A. M. (1978) Commun. Math. Phys. 59, pp. 109–116.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 29.Heckman, G. J. (1991) in Birkhäuser, Barker, W. and Sally, P. (eds.) Basel; (1991) Inv. Math. 103, pp. 341–350.Google Scholar
- 30.Heckman, G. J. and Opdam, E. M. (1987) Comp. Math. 64, pp. 329–352; Heckman, G. J. (1987) Comp. Math. 64, pp. 353–373; Opdam, E. M. (1988) Comp. Math. 67, pp. 21–49, 191–209.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 31.Freedman, D. Z. and Mende, P. F. (1990) Nucl. Phys. 344, pp. 317–343.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 32.Dyson, F. J. (1962) J. Math. Phys. 3, pp. 140–156, 157–165, 166–175; J. Math. Phys. 3, (1962) pp. 1191–1198.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 33.Rühl, W. and Turbiner, A. (1995) Mod. Phys. Lett. A10, pp. 2213–2222; Haschke, O. and Rühl, W. (2000) Lecture Notes in Physics 539, pp. 118–140, Springer, Berlin.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 34.Caseiro, R., Françoise, J. P., and Sasaki, R. (2000) J. Math. Phys. 41, pp. 4679–4689.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 35.Stanley, R. (1989) Adv. Math. 77, pp. 76–115; Macdonald, I. G. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 36.Lapointe, L. and Vinet, L. (1997) Adv. Math. 130, pp. 261–279; Commun. Math. Phys. 178, (1996), pp. 425–452.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 37.Baker, T. H. and Forrester, P. J. (1997) Commun. Math. Phys. 188, pp. 175–216.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 38.Awata, H., Matsuo, Y., Odake, S. and Shiraishi, J. (1995) Nucl. Phys. B449, pp. 347–374.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 39.Gambardella, P. J. (1975) J. Math. Phys. 16, pp. 1172–1187.CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 40.Calogero, F. (1969) J. Math. Phys. 10, pp. 2191–2196; J. Math. Phys. 10, pp. 2197–2200.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 41.Szegö, G. (1939) Orthogonal Polynomials, American Mathematical Society, New York.Google Scholar
- 42.Wolfes, J. (1974) J. Math. Phys. 15, pp. 1420–1424; Calogero, F. and Marchioro, C. (1974) J. Math. Phys. 15, pp. 1425–1430.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
- 43.Rosenbaum, M., Turbiner, A., and Capella, A. (1998) Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13, pp. 3885–3904; Gurappa, N., Khare, A., and Panigrahi, P. K. (1998) Phys. Lett. A244, pp. 467–472.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 44.Haschke, O. and Rühl, W. (1998) Mod. Phys. Lett. A13, pp. 3109–3122; Modern Phys. Lett. A14, (1999) pp. 937–949.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 45.Kakei, S. (1996) J. Phys. A29, pp. L619–L624; J. Phys. A30, (1997) pp. L535–L541.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 46.Ghosh, P. K., Khare, A., and Sivakumar, M. (1998) Phys. Rev. A58, pp. 821–825; Sukhatme, U. and Khare, A. quant-ph/9902072.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 47.Kuanetsov, V. B. (1996) Phys. Lett. A218, pp. 212–222.ADSGoogle Scholar
- 48.Caseiro, R., Francoise J.-P., and Sasaki, R. (2001) J. Math. Phys. 42, pp. 5329–5340.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 49.Sasaki, R. and Takasaki, K. (2001) J. Phys. A34, pp. 9533–9553, 10335.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 50.Efthimiou, C. and Spector, D. (1997) Phys. Rev. A56, pp. 208–219.ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 51.Cherednik, I. V. (1995) Comm. Math. Phys. 169, pp. 441–461.MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 52.Oshima, T. and Sekiguchi, H. (1995) J. Math. Sci. Univ. Tokyo 2, pp. 1–75.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 53.Humphreys, J. E. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1990.Google Scholar
- 54.Krichever, I. M. (1980) Funct. Anal. Appl. 14, pp. 282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer 2006