AB Initio Atomistic Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics of Surface Properties and Functions

  • Karsten Reuter
  • Catherine Stampf
  • Matthias Scheffler


Previous and present “academic” research aiming at atomic scale understanding is mainly concerned with the study of individual molecular processes possibly underlying materials science applications. In investigations of crystal growth one would, for example, study the diffusion of adsorbed atoms at surfaces, and in the field of heterogeneous catalysis it is the reaction path of adsorbed species that is analyzed. Appealing properties of an individual process are then frequently discussed in terms of their direct importance for the envisioned material function, or reciprocally, the function of materials is often believed to be understandable by essentially one prominent elementary process only. What is often overlooked in this approach is that in macroscopic systems of technological relevance typically a large number of distinct atomic scale processes take place. Which of them are decisive for observable system properties and functions is then not only determined by the detailed individual properties of each process alone, but in many, if not most cases, also the interplay of all processes, i.e., how they act together, plays a crucial role. For a predictive materials science modeling with microscopic understanding, a description that treats the statistical interplay of a large number of microscopically well-described elementary processes must therefore be applied. Modern electronic structure theory methods such as density-functional theory (DFT) have become a standard tool for the accurate description of the individual atomic and molecular processes.


Monte Carlo Statistical Mechanic Potential Energy Surface Elementary Process Bulk Oxide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, “Inhomogeneous electron gas,” Phys. Rev. B, 136, 864, 1964.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    W. Kohn and L. Sham, “Self consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects,” Phys. Rev. A, 140, 1133, 1965.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.G. Parr and W. Yang, Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules, Oxford University Press, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R.M. Dreizler and E.K.U. Gross, Density Functional Theory, Springer, Berlin, 1990.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M.P. Allen and D.J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation, 2nd edn., Academic Press, San Diego, 2002.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. Car and M. Parrinello, “Unified approach for molecular dynamics and density-functional theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 55, 2471, 1985.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M.C. Payne, M.P. Teter, D.C. Allan, T.A. Arias, and J.D. Joannopoulos, “Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total energy calculations: molecular dynamics and conjugate gradients,” Rev. Mod. Phys., 64, 1045, 1992.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. Galli and A. Pasquarello, “First-principle molecular dynamics,” In: M.P. Allen, and DJ. Tildesley (eds.), Computer Simulations in Chemical Physics, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Gross, “Reactions at surfaces studied by ab initio dynamics calculations,” Surf. Sci. Rep., 32, 293, 1998.ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G.J. Kroes, “Six-dimensional quantum dynamics of dissociative chemisorption of H2 on metal surfaces,” Prog. Surf. Sci., 60, 1, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A.F. Voter, F. Montalenti, and T.C. Germann, “Extending the time scale in atomistic simulation of materials,” Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 32, 321, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Zangwill, Physics at Surfaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R.I. Masel, Principles of Adsorption and Reaction on Solid Surfaces, Wiley, New York, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. Stampfl, M.V. Ganduglia-Pirovano, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, “Catalysis and corrosion: the theoretical surface-science context,” Surf. Sci., 500, 368, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Scheffler and C. Stampfl, “Theory of adsorption on metal substrates,” In: K. Horn and M. Scheffler (eds.), Handbook of Surface Science, vol. 2: Electronic Structure, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2000.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    G.R. Darling and S. Holloway, “The dissociation of diatomic molecules at surfaces,” Rep. Prog. Phys., 58, 1595, 1995.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    E. Kaxiras, Y. Bar-Yam, J.D. Joannopoulos, and K.C. Pandey, “Ab initio theory of polar semiconductor surfaces. I. Methodology and the (22) reconstructions of GaAs(111),” Phys. Rev. B, 35, 9625, 1987.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Scheffler, “Thermodynamic aspects of bulk and surface defects — first-principles calculations,” In: J. Koukal (ed.), Physics of Solid Surfaces — 1987, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    M. Scheffler and J. Dabrowski, “Parameter-free calculations of total energies, inter-atomic forces, and vibrational entropies of defects in semiconductors,” Phil. Mag. A, 58, 107, 1988.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    G.-X. Qian, R.M. Martin, and D.J. Chadi, “First-principles study of the atomic reconstructions and energies of Ga-and As-stabilized GaAs(100) surfaces,” Phys. Rev. B, 38, 7649, 1988.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    X.-G. Wang, W. Weiss, Sh.K. Shaikhutdinov, M. Ritter, M. Petersen, F. Wagner, R. Schlögl, and M. Scheffler, “The hematite (alpha-Fe2O3)(0001) surface: evidence for domains of distinct chemistry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 81, 1038, 1998.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    X.-G. Wang, A. Chaka, and M. Scheffler, “Effect of the environment on Al2O3(0001) surface structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3650, 2000.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, “Composition, structure, and stability of RuO2(110) as a function of oxygen pressure,” Phys. Rev. B, 65, 035406, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, “First-principles atomistic thermodynamics for oxidation catalysis: surface phase diagrams and catalytically interesting regions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 046103, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, “Composition and structure of the RuO2(1 10) surface in an O2 and CO environment: implications for the catalytic formation of CO2,” Phys. Rev. B, 68, 045407, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Z. Lodzianan and J.K. Nørskov, “Stability of the hydroxylated (0001) surface of Al2O3,” J. Chem. Phys., 118, 11179, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    K. Reuter and M. Scheffler, “Oxide formation at the surface of late 4d transition metals: insights from first-principles atomistic thermodynamics,” Appl. Phys. A, 78, 793, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    K. Reuter “Nanometer and sub-nanometer thin oxide films at surfaces of late transition metals,” In: U. Heiz, H. Hakkinen, and U. Landman (eds.), Nanocatalysis: Principles, Methods, Case Studies, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, and J. Weitkamp (eds.), Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley, New York, 1997.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    D.P. Woodruff and T.A. Delchar, Modern Techniques of Surface Science, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    W.-X. Li, C. Stampfl, and M. Scheffler, “Insights into the function of silver as an oxidation catalyst by ab initio atomistic thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. B, 68, 16541, 2003.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    W.-X. Li, C. Stampfl, and M. Scheffler, “Why is a noble metal catalytically active? the role of the O-Ag interaction in the function of silver as an oxidation catalyst,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 256102, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    D.A. Mc Quarrie, Statistical Mechanics, Harper and Row, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    D.R. Stull and H. Prophet, JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 2nd edn., U.S. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., 1971.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    E. Lundgren, J. Gustafson, A. Mikkelsen, J.N. Andersen, A. Stierle, H. Dosch, M. Todorova, J. Rogal, K. Reuter, and M. Scheffler, “Kinetic hindrance during the initial oxidation of Pd(100) at ambient pressures,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 92, 046101, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    M. Todorova, E. Lundgren, V. Blum, A. Mikkelsen, S. Gray, J. Gustafson, M. Borg, J. Rogal, K. Reuter, J.N. Andersen, and M. Scheffler, “The Pd(100)-(√5 x √5) R27°-O surface oxide revisited,” Surf. Sci., 541, 101, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    E. Lundgren, G. Kresse, C. Klein, M. Borg, J.N. Andersen, M. De Santis, Y Gauthier, C. Konvicka, M. Schmid, and P. Varga, “Two-dimensional oxide on Pd(111),” Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 246103, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Michaelides, M.L. Bocquet, P. Sautet, A. Alavi, and D.A. King, “Structures and thermodynamic phase transitions for oxygen and silver oxide phases on Ag(111),” Chem. Phys. Lett., 367, 344, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    C.M. Weinert and M. Scheffler, In: H.J. von Bardeleben (ed.), Defects in Semiconductors, Mat. Sci. Forum, 10–12, 25, 1986.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    S.-H. Lee, W. Moritz, and M. Scheffler, “GaAs(00l) under conditions of low as pressure: edvidence for a novel surface geometry,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 85, 3890, 2000.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    C.B. Duke, “Semiconductor surface reconstruction: the structural chemistry of twodimensional surface compounds,” Chem. Rev., 96, 1237, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    T. Engel and G. Ertl, “Oxidation of carbon monoxide,” In: D.A. King and D.P. Woodruff (eds.), The Chemical Physics of Solid Surfaces and Heterogeneous Catalysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    B.L.M. Hendriksen, S.C. Bobaru, and J.W.M. Frenken, “Oscillatory CO oxidation on Pd(100) studied with in situ scanning tunnelling microscopy,” Surf. Sci., 552, 229, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    H. Over and M. Muhler, “Catalytic CO oxidation over ruthenium — bridging the pressure gap,” Prog. Surf. Sci., 72, 3, 2003.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    G. Ertl, “Heterogeneous catalysis on the atomic scale,” J. Mol. Catal. A, 182, 5, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    D.P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    D. de Fontaine, In: P.E.A. Turchi and A. Gonis (eds.), Statics and Dynamics of Alloy Phase Transformations, NATO ASI Series, Plenum Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  49. [49]
    J.M. Sanchez, F. Ducastelle, and D. Gratias, “Generalized cluster description of multicomponent systems,” Physica A, 128, 334, 1984.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    A. Zunger, “First principles statistical mechanics of semiconductor alloys and intermetallic compounds,” In: P.E.A. Turchi and A. Gonis (eds.), Statics and Dynamics of Alloy Phase Transformations, NATO ASI Series, Plenum Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  51. [51]
    P. Piercy, K. De’Bell, and H. Pfniir, “Phase diagram and critical behavior of the adsorption system O/Ru(001): comparison with lattice-gas models,” Phys. Rev. B, 45, 1869, 1992.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    G.M. Xiong, C. Schwennicke, H. Pfniir, and H.-U. Everts, “Phase diagram and phase transitions of the adsorbate system S/Ru(0001): a monte carlo study of a lattice gas model,” Z Phys. B, 104, 529, 1997.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    V.P. Zhdanov and B. Kasemo, “Simulation of oxygen desorption from Pt(l 11),” Surf. Sci., 415, 403, 1998.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    S.-J. Koh and G. Ehrlich, “Pair-and many-atom interactions in the cohesion of surface clusters: Pdx and Irx on W(l 10),” Phys. Rev. B, 60, 5981, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    L. Osterlund, M.Ø. Pedersen, I. Stensgaard, E. Lægsgaard, and F. Besenbacher, “Quantitative determination of adsorbate-adsorbate interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 4812, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    S.H. Payne, H.J. Kreuzer, W. Frie, L. Hammer, and K. Heinz, “Adsorption and desorption of hydrogen on Rh(311) and comparison with other Rh surfaces,” Surf. Sci., 421, 279, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    C. Stampfl, H.J. Kreuzer, S.H. Payne, H. Pfniir, and M. Scheffler, “First-principles theory of surface thermodynamics and kinetics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 2993, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    C. Stampfl, HJ. Kreuzer, S.H. Payne, and M. Scheffler, “Challenges in predictive calculations of processes at surfaces: surface thermodynamics and catalytic reactions,” Appl. Phys. A, 69, 471, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    J. Shao, “Linear model selection by cross-validation,” J. Amer. Statist. Assoc., 88, 486, 1993.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    P. Zhang, “Model selection via multifold cross-validation,” Ann. statist., 21, 299, 1993.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    A. van de Walle and G. Ceder, “Automating first-principles phase diagram calculations,” J. Phase Equilibria, 23, 348, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth, A.H. Teller, and E. Teller, “Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines,” J. Chem. Phys., 21, 1087, 1976.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    J.-S. McEwen, S.H. Payne, and C. Stampfl, “Phase diagram of O/Ru(0001) from first principles,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 361, 317, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    H.J. Kreuzer and S.H. Payne, “Theoretical approaches to the kinetics of adsorption, desorption and reactions at surfaces,” In: M. Borowko (eds.), Computational Methods in Surface and Colloid, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  65. [65]
    C. Stampfl and M. Scheffler, “Theory of alkali metal adsorption on close-packed metal surfaces,” Surf. Rev. Lett., 2, 317, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    D.L. Actams, “New phenomena in the adsorption of alkali metals on A1 surfaces,” Appl. Phys. A, 62, 123, 1996.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    M. Borg, C. Stampfl, A. Mikkelsen, J. Gustafson, E. Lundgren, M. Scheffler, and J.N. Andersen, “Density of configurational states from first-principles: the phase diagram of Al-Na surface alloys,” Chem. Phys. Chem. (in press), 2005.Google Scholar
  68. [68]
    F. Wang and D.P. Landau, “Efficient, multiple-range random walk algorithm to calculate the density of states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 86, 2050, 2001.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    H.C. Kang and W.H. Weinberg, “Modeling the kinetics of heterogeneous catalysis,” Chem. Rev., 95, 667, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    A.B. Bortz, M.H. Kalos, and J.L. Lebowitz, “New algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of ising spin systems,” J. Comp. Phys., 17, 10, 1975.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    D.T. Gillespie, “General method for numerically simulating stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions,” J. Comp. Phys., 22, 403, 1976.CrossRefMathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    A.R Voter, “Classically exact overlayer dynamics: diffusion of rhodium clusters on Rh(100),” Phys. Rev. B, 34, 6819, 1986.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    H.C. Kang and W.H. Weinberg, “Dynamic Monte Carlo with a proper energy barrier: surface diffusion and two-dimensional domain ordering,” J. Chem. Phys., 90, 2824, 1989.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    K.A. Fichthorn and W.H. Weinberg, “Theoretical foundations of dynamical Monte Carlo simulations,” J. Chem. Phys., 95, 1090, 1991.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    P. Ruggerone, C. Ratsch, and M. Scheffler, “Density-functional theory of epitaxial growth of metals,” In: D.A. King and D.P. Woodruff (eds.), Growth and Properties of Ultrathin Epitaxial Layers. The Chemical Physics of Solid Surfaces, vol. 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997.Google Scholar
  76. [76]
    C. Ratsch, P. Ruggerone, and M. Scheffler, “Study of strain and temperature dependence of metal epitaxy,” In: Z. Zhang and M.G. Lagally (eds.), Morphological Organization in Epitaxial Growth and Removal, World Scientific, Singapore, 1998.Google Scholar
  77. [77]
    S. Glasston, K.J. Laidler, and H. Eyring, The Theory of Rate Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1941.Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    G.H. Vineyard, “Frequency factors and isotope effects in solid state rate processes,” J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 3, 121, 1957.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    K.J. Laidler, Chemical Kinetics, Harper and Row, New York, 1987.Google Scholar
  80. [80]
    C. Ratsch and M. Scheffler, “Density-functional theory calculations of hopping rates of surface diffusion,” Phys. Rev. B, 58, 13163, 1998.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    G. Henkelman, G. Johannesson, and H. Jonsson, “Methods for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths,” In: S.D. Schwartz (ed.), Progress on Theoretical Chemistry and Physics, Kluwer, New York, 2000.Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    T. Ala-Nissila, R. Ferrando, and S.C. Ying, “Collective and single particle diffusion on surfaces,” Adv. Phys., 51, 949, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    S. Ovesson, A. Bogicevic, and B.I. Lundqvist, “Origin of compact triangular islands in metal-on-metal growth,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 2608, 1999.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    K.A. Fichthorn and M. Scheffler, “Island nucleation in thin-film epitaxy: a first-principles investigation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5371, 2000.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    P. Kratzer M. Scheffler, “Surface knowledge: Toward a predictive theory of materials,” Comp. in Science and Engineering, 3(6), 16, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    P. Kratzer and M. Scheffler, “Reaction-limited island nucleation in molecular beam epitaxy of compound semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 88, 036102, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    P. Kratzer, E. Penev, and M. Scheffler, “First-principles studies of kinetics in epitaxial growth of III-V semiconductors,” Appl. Phys. A, 75, 79, 2002.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  88. [88]
    E.W. Hansen and M. Neurock, “Modeling surface kinetics with first-principles-based molecular simulation,” Chem. Eng. Sci., 54, 3411, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. [89]
    E.W. Hansen and M. Neurock, “First-principles-based Monte Carlo simulation of ethylene hydrogenation kinetics on Pd,” J. Catal., 196, 241, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    K. Reuter, D. Frenkel, and M. Scheffler, “The steady state of heterogeneous catalysis, studied with first-principles statistical mechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 116105, 2004.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karsten Reuter
    • 1
  • Catherine Stampf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Matthias Scheffler
    • 1
  1. 1.Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-GesellschaftBerlinGermany
  2. 2.School of PhysicsThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations