The Hydrodynamic Efficiency of Non-Traditional Levee Protection Methods in the Sacramento River Delta

  • Douglas Sherman
  • Jean Ellis
  • Jeffrey Hart
  • David Hansen

Abstract

Levee erosion and failure is a widespread environmental management problem. In many low-lying regions around the world, levees are the only line of protection against inundation. Erosion, as a result of natural and anthropogenic processes, reduces the structural integrity of levees and increases the threat of failure. Standard actions to mitigate levee erosion involve engineering responses, such as levee enlargement, bank armoring, or building flow-control structures. There are environments, however, where management objectives, such as recreation enhancement or habitat preservation, encourage non-traditional approaches to protection. This is the case for many of the waterways in the Delta region of California’s Central Valley.

Keywords

Suspended Sediment Levee System Energy Attenuation Hydrodynamic Efficiency Levee Bank 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arreola, D. D. 1975. The Chinese Role in the Making of the Early Cultural Landscape of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. The California Geographer 15: 1–15.Google Scholar
  2. Bauer, B. O., M. S. Lorang, and D. J. Sherman. 2002. Estimating Boat-Wake-Induced Levee Erosion Using Suspended Sediment Measurements. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, ASCE 128: 152–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. CALFED. 2000. Levee System Integrity Program Plan, Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report. Sacramento, CA: CALFED Bay-Delta Program.Google Scholar
  4. CDWR. 1995. Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Atlas. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Water Resources.Google Scholar
  5. Dean, R. G. 1978. Effects of Vegetation on Shoreline Erosional Processes. In P. E. Greeson and J. R. Clark, eds. Wetland Functions and Values, 415–426. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Wetlands, American Water Resource Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  6. Ellis, J. T., D. J. Sherman, B. O. Bauer, and J. Hart. 2002. Assessing the Impact of an Organic Restoration Structure on Boat Wake Energy. Journal of Coastal Research SI 36: 356–365.Google Scholar
  7. Hansen, D. J. 2002. An Evaluation of Boat-Wake Energy Attenuation by a Tule Stand on the Sacramento River. Department of Geography, University of Southern California, unpublished M.S. thesis.Google Scholar
  8. Kobayashi, N., A. W. Raichle, and T. Asano. 1992. Wave Attenuation by Vegetation. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, ASCE 119: 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas Sherman
    • 1
  • Jean Ellis
    • 1
  • Jeffrey Hart
    • 2
  • David Hansen
    • 3
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Habitat Assessment and Restoration Team, Inc.USA
  3. 3.University of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations