Damage, Control and Management of Weevil Pests, Especially Hylobius Abietis

  • B. LÅngstrÖm
  • K.R. Day

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfaro, R.I., Borden, J.H., Fraser R.G. & Yanchuk, A. 1995. The white pine weevil in British Columbia: basis for an integrated pest management system. Forest Chronicle, 71, 61-73.Google Scholar
  2. Alfaro, R.I., Borden, J.H., King, J.N., Tomlin E.S., McIntosh R.L., Bohlmann, J. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance in conifers against shoot infesting insects, In: Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in trees to insects. Wagner, M.R., Clancy, K.M., Lieutier, F., T.D. Paine, (Eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht-Boston-London.Google Scholar
  3. Anonymous 1978. Snytbaggeutredningen. Om skydd mot insektsskador på plantor. Skogsstyrelsen, 1-161.Google Scholar
  4. Armendariz, I., Downes, M. J., & Griffin, C. T., 2002. Effect of timber condition on parasitisation of pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) larvae by entomopathogenic nematodes under laboratory conditions. Biocontrol Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. Beitzen-Heineke, I., & Kolbe, H. 1987. Der “Teno Kragen” und die Abwehr von Hylobius abietisVersuche und Praxiserfahrungen in Niedersachsen. Forst und Holzwirt 42, 40 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Björklund, N. & Nordlander, G. 2001. Snytbaggen hittar alla plantor! Plantaktuellt, 2001, 5.Google Scholar
  7. Björklund, N., Nordlander, G. & Bylund, H. 2003. Host-plant acceptance on mineral soil and humus by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.). Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 5, 61-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blomqvist, A.G. 1883. Finlands trädslag i forstligt hänseende beskrifna. I. Tallen. Finska forstför. medd. 3, 1-196.Google Scholar
  9. Bratt, K., Sunnerheim, K., Nordenhem, H., Nordlander, G. & Långström, B. 2001. Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) antifeedants from lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 27, 2253-62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brixey J., 1997. The potential for biological control to reduce Hylobius abietis damage. Forestry Commission Research Information Note, 273.Google Scholar
  11. Bylund, H., Nordlander, G. & Nordenhem, H. 2004. Feeding and oviposition rates in the pine weevil Hylobius abiestis (Col.., Curculionidae). Bull Ent Res 94, (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Charitonova, N.S. 1965. Bolschoj sosnovij dolgonosik i borjba s nim. Moskva, 1-88.Google Scholar
  13. Christiansen, E. 1971. Time of attack by the pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL.) in young reforestation areas. Medd. Norske skogsforsoksv. 28, 421-27.Google Scholar
  14. Christiansen, E. & Sandvik, M. 1974. Skade av gransnutebille på furuplantor i markberedningsflekker. (Damage by pine weevils to Scots pine seedlings in scarified patches of varying size). Norsk skogbruk 20:8-9. In Norwegian with English abstract.Google Scholar
  15. Creevey, C.J., 1999. Fungal colonisers of coniferous stumps as deterrents of the large european pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) . M.Sc. Thesis, National University of Ireland Maynooth. 1999.Google Scholar
  16. Day, K.R. & Leather, S.R., 1997. Threats to forestry by insect pests in Europe(Chapter 11). InA.D. Watt, N.E. Stork, M.D. Hunter (Eds.) Forests and Insects Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Doom, D., Frenken, G. W. P., 1980. Het uitstellen van herbeplantingen als maatregel tegen schade door de grote dennesnuitkever, Curculio abietis [Postponement of replanting as a silvicultural method to prevent damage by the large pine weevil Curculio [Hylobius] abietis. [Dutch]]. Nederlands Bosbouw Tijdschrift. 52, 217-27.Google Scholar
  18. Eidmann, H.H. 1969. Rüsselkäferschäden an verschiedenen Nahrungspflanzen. Anz. Schädlingsk. Pflanzenschutz, 42, 22-26.Google Scholar
  19. Eidmann, H.H. 1974. HylobiusSchönh. In. Die Forstschädlinge Europas. 2 Käfer, : W. Schwenke, . Hamburg.Google Scholar
  20. Eidmann, H.H. 1979. Integrated management of pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL.) populations in Sweden. in Current topics in forest entomology. Forest Service General Technical Report WO-8, USDA.Google Scholar
  21. Eidmann, H.H. 1987. Attractants and deterrents of natural origin for the suppression of bark beetle attacks. Proceedings, European seminar on wood production and harvesting, Vol 3, Bologna 1987 , 56-62.Google Scholar
  22. Eidmann, H.H. 1997. Assessment of pine weevil numbers on clear-cut and forest sites with shelter boards and pitfall traps. Anz. Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 70, 68-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eidmann, H.H. & von Sydow F., 1989. Stockings for protection of containerized conifer seedlings against pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.) damage. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4, 537-47.Google Scholar
  24. Eidmann, H. H., Nordenhem, H. & Weslien, J. 1996. Physical protection of conifer seedlings against pine weevil feeding. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 11, 68-75.Google Scholar
  25. Eidt, D.C., Zervos, S., Pye, A.E., & Finney-Crawley, J.R. 1995. Control of Hylobius congenerDalla Torre, Schenkling and Marshall (Coleoptera:Curculionidae) using entomopathogenic nematodes. Canadian Entomologist 127, 431-38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elton, E.T.G., Blankwaardt, H.F.H., Burger, H.C., Steemers, W.F. & Tichelman, L.G. 1964. Insect communities in barked and unbarked pine stumps, with special reference to large pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL., Col., Scolytidae). Zeitschrift fur angewandte Entomologie, 55, 1-54.Google Scholar
  27. Ericsson, A., Gref, R., Hellqvist, C., & Långström, B. 1988. Wound response of living bark of Scots pine and its influence on subsequent feeding by Hylobius abietis. In: Mechanisms of woody plant defenses against insects, W.J. Mattson, J. Levieux, C. Bernard-Dagan (Eds). Springer Verlag. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  28. Escherich, K. 1923. Die Forstinsekten Mitteleuropas II. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin.Google Scholar
  29. Fjelstad-Pedersen, A., & Ravn, H.P. 2000. Stor nåletraesnudebille - biologi, modforholdsregler og strateg. Skov&landskab, Skovbruksserien 26, 1-49.Google Scholar
  30. Franceschi, V.R., Krekling, T., & Christiansen, E. 2002. Application of methyl jasmonate on Picea abies(Pinaceae) stems induces defense-related responses in phloem and xylem. American Journal of Botany, 89, 578-86.Google Scholar
  31. Gerdin, S., & Hedqvist, K.J. 1984. Perilitus areolaris sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), an imago-parasitoid of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (Linnaeus), and its reproductive behaviour. Entomologica Scandinavica 15, 363-69.Google Scholar
  32. Hagner, M. & Jonsson, C. 1995. Survival after planting without soil preparation for pine and spruce seedlings protected from Hylobius abietisby physical and chemical shelters. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 10, 225-34.Google Scholar
  33. Halldorsson, G., Sverrisson, H., Eyjolfsdottir, G.G. & Oddsdottir, E.S. 2000. Ectomycorrhizae reduce damage to Russian larch by Otiorrhynchus larvae. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 354-58.Google Scholar
  34. Hannerz, M., Thorsen, Å., Mattsson, S., & Weslien, J. 2002. Pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to cuttings and seedlings of Norway spruce. Forest Ecology and Management 160, 11-17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harding, S., Annila, E., Ehnström, B., Halldorsson, G., & Kvamme, T. 1998. Insect pests in forests of the Nordic countries 1987-1990. Rapport fra Skogforskningen - Supplement 3, 1-22.Google Scholar
  36. Hedqvist, K-J. 1958. Notes on Bracon hylobiiRatsb. (Hym. Braconidae), a parasite of the Pine weevil, (Hylobius abietis). Annales Entomologici Fennici, 24, No 2.Google Scholar
  37. Hellqvist, C. 2001. Bugstop:skador på plantor i humus. Plantaktuellt 1, 7.Google Scholar
  38. Henry, C.J. & Day, K.R., 2001. Biocontrol of the large pine weevil: structure of host (Hylobius abietis[L.]) and parasitoid (Bracon hylobiiRatz.) populations in felled stumps of Sitka spruce. In Protection of World Forests from Insect Pests: Advances in Research.R.I. Alfaro, K. Day, S.Salom, K.S.S. Nair, H.Evans, A.Liebhold, F. Lieutier, M. Wagner, K. Futai, K. Suzuki (Eds), IUFRO World Series, Vol. 11 , IUFRO Secretariat, Vienna.Google Scholar
  39. Heritage, S., Collins, S., & Evans, H.F. 1989. A survey of damage by Hylobius abietis and Hylastes spp. in Britain. In: Insects affecting reforestation: biology and damage. Alfaro RI & Glover SG (Eds). Proceed. Vancouver, Victoria, Canada. Forestry Canada.Google Scholar
  40. Heritage, S., Jennings, T., Johnson, D., 1997. The use of Marshal/Suscon granules to protect plants from Hylobiusdamage.. Research Information Note - Forestry Commission. Forestry Commission, Forest Research Station, Farnham, UK. 269.Google Scholar
  41. Heritage, S., Jennings, T., Johnson, D., 1997. The use of permethrin 12ED through the electrodyn sprayer conveyor to protect forest plants from Hylobius damage.. Research Information Note - Forestry Commission. Forestry Commission, Forest Research Station, Farnham, UK. 271.Google Scholar
  42. Holmgren, E.A. 1867. De för träd och buskar nyttiga och skadliga insekterna jemte utrotningsmedel för de sednare. Stockholm , 1-362.Google Scholar
  43. Juutinen, P. 1962. Tutkimuksia metsätuhojen esiintymisestä männyn ja kuusen viljelytaimistoissa Etelä-Suomessa. Referat: Untersuchungen ueber das Auftreten von Waldschäden in den Kiefern- und Fichtenkulturen Sudfinnland. Comm. Inst. For. Fenn. 54, 1-80.Google Scholar
  44. Kindvall, O., Nordlander, G. and Nordenhem, H. 2000 Movement behaviour of pine weevil Hylobius abietisin relation to soil type: an arena experiment. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 95, 53-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Klepzig, K.D. & Schlyter, F. 1999. Laboratory evaluation of plant-derived antifeedants against the pine weevil Hylobius abietis(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92, 644-50.Google Scholar
  46. Kohmann, K. 2000. Voksbehandling av rothalsen på skogplanter som alternativ til insekticider som brukes mot insektgnag etter utplanting. Rapport fra Skogforskningen 5, 1-15.Google Scholar
  47. Korczynski, I. 1984. Population density of the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL ) and the extent of damage done by it in Scotch pine (Pinus silvestrisL) plantation in dependence on the time of cutting (In Polish). Sylwan 128, 53-58.Google Scholar
  48. Korczynski, J., 1984. Nowe dane o wystepowaniu w Polsce Perilitus rutilus Nees (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), jako pasozyta szeliniaka sosnowca - Hylobius abietisL. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) [New data on the occurrence in Poland of Perilitus rutilusNees (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) as a parasite of the pine weevil - Hylobius abietis L. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). [Polish]]. Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne. 54, 2, 403-06.Google Scholar
  49. Krokene P, Christiansen E, Solheim H, Berryman AA, Franceschi VR (1999) Induced resistance to pathogenic fungi in Norway spruce. Plant Physiol.ogy, 121, 565-70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Krokene, P., Solheim, H., & Långström, B. 2000. Fungal infection and mechanical wounding induce disease resistance in Scots pine. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 106, 537-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. KSLA 1998. Klarar vi snytbaggen utan insekticider? Kungliga Skogs –och Lantbruksakademiens Tidskrift, 137, 15.Google Scholar
  52. Långström; B. 1972. Snytbaggarnas (Hylobius spp., Col., Curculionidae) uppträdande på hyggen av varierande ålder och skogstyp i Finland 1970-1971. Licentiate-thesis at the Faculty of Forestry at the University of Helsinki, 1-100 (In Swedish only but partly summarized in Långström 1982, see below)Google Scholar
  53. Långström, B. 1982. Abundance and seasonal activity of adult Hylobius-weevils in reforestation areas during first years following final felling. Comm Inst For fenn 106, 1-23.Google Scholar
  54. Långström, B. 1998. Varför är snytbaggen fortfarande ett problem?. KSLA Tidskrift 137, 23-33.Google Scholar
  55. Leather, S.R., Ahmed, S.I. & Hogan, L. 1994. Adult feeding preferences of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). European Journal of Entomology, 91, 385-89.Google Scholar
  56. Leather, S. R., Day, K. R. & Salisbury, A. N., 1999. The biology and ecology of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis(Coleoptera: Curculionidae): a problem of dispersal. Bulletin of Entomological Research. 89, 1, 3-16.Google Scholar
  57. Lekander, B., & Söderström, V. 1969. Studier över snytbagge-angrepp på barrträdsplantor. Sveriges skogsv.förb. Tidskr. 4, 351-83.Google Scholar
  58. Lekander, B. & Lindelöw, Å. 1977. Helträdsutnyttjande och insekterna. Proj. Helträdsutnyttjande, PHU 52, 1-25.Google Scholar
  59. Lieutier, F., Garcia, J., Yart, A., Laetitia, G., Malphettes, C.-B., & Romary, P. 1997. Preliminary investigation on the relationships between phloem phenolic content of Scots pine and maturation feeding of the pine weevil Hylobius abietis, In: Integrating cultural tactics into the management of bark beetles and reforestation pests.J.C. Gregoire, F.M. Liebhold, F.M. Stephen, K.R. Day, & S. Salom (Eds), USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NE-236.Google Scholar
  60. Lieutier, F. 2002. Mechanisms of resistance in conifers and bark beetle attack strategies. In. Mechanisms and deployment of resistance in trees to insects. M.R. Wagner, K.M. Clancy, F. Lieutier, F., T.D. Paine, T.D. (Eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht-Boston-London.Google Scholar
  61. Lindgren, B. S., Nordlander, G. & Birgersson, G. 1996. Feeding deterrence of verbenone to the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (L.) (Col., Curculionidae). Journal of Applied Entomology 120, 397-403.Google Scholar
  62. Lindström, A. & Hellqvist, C. 2001. Miniplantor lurar snytbaggen? Plantaktuellt 1, 14.Google Scholar
  63. Lindström, A., Hellqvist, C., Gyldberg, B., Långström, B., & Mattsson, A. 1986. Field performance of a protective collar against damage by Hylobius abietis. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1, 3-15.Google Scholar
  64. Linnaeus, C. 1767. Systema naturae. Tom I. Pars II. Editio duodecima reformata. Holmiae.Google Scholar
  65. Luik, A., Sibul, I. & Voolma, K. 2000. Influence of some plant water extracts and neem preparations on the maturation feeding of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis L. Baltic Forestry 6, 53-58.Google Scholar
  66. Moore, R. 2001. Emergence trap developed to capture adult large pine weevil Hylobius abietisL. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and its parasite Bracon hylobii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 91, 109-15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Nordlander, G.y 1987 A method for trapping Hylobius abietis (L.) with a standardised bait and its potential for forecasting seedling damage. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2, 199-213.Google Scholar
  68. Nordlander, G. 1990. Limonene inhibits attraction to alpha-pinene in the pine weevils Hylobius abietisand H. pinastri. Journal of Chemical Ecology 16, 1307-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Nordlander, G. 1991. Host finding in the pine weevil Hylobius abietis - Effects of conifer volatiles and added limonene. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 59, 229-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Nordlander, G. 2001. Gnagavskräckande ämne kan bli framtidens plantskydd. Plantaktuellt 2001, 16.Google Scholar
  71. Nordlander, G. 2001. Forskningsprogrammet Snytbagge 2005. Plantaktuellt 2001, 3.Google Scholar
  72. Nordlander, G., Petersson, M., von Hofsten, H. & Lindström, A. 2001. Plantskydd mot snytbagge – principerna och verkligheten. SkogForsk Resultat 12, 1-4.Google Scholar
  73. Nordlander, G., Örlander, G. & Langvall, O. 2003a. Feeding by the pine weevil Hylobius abietisin relation to sun exposure and distance to forest edge. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 5: 191-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nordlander, G., Bylund, H., Örlander, G., & Wallertz, K. 2003b. Pine weevil population density and damage to coniferous seedlings in regeneration areas with and without shelterwood. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 18, 438-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Örlander, G. & Nordlander, G. 1998. Skärmar, markberedning och andra skogsskötselåtgärder - kan de minska snytbaggeskadorna? Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbr.Akad. Tidskrift 137, 57-67.Google Scholar
  76. Örlander, G. & Petersson. M. 1998. Mekaniska snytbaggeskydd. Kungl. Skogs- och Lantbr.Akad. Tidskrift 137, 43-50.Google Scholar
  77. Örlander, G. & Nilsson, U. 1999. Effects of reforestation methods on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage and seedling survival. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 14, 314-54.Google Scholar
  78. Örlander, G. & Wallertz, K. 1999. Sommaravverkning gav mer snytbaggeskador. Skogseko 1, 14-15.Google Scholar
  79. Örlander, G. & Nordlander, G. 2003. Effects of field vegetation control on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Annals of Forest Science 60, 667-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Örlander, G., Nilsson, U., & Nordlander, G. 1997. Pine weevil abundance on clear-cuttings of different ages: A 6-year study using pitfall traps. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 12, 225-40.Google Scholar
  81. Örlander, G., Nordlander, G., Wallerz, K. & Nordenhem, H. 2000. Feeding in the crowns of Scots pine trees by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15, 194-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Örlander, G., Nordlander, G.and Wallerz, K. 2001 Extra food supply decreases damage by the pine weevil Hylobius abietis. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 16, 450-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ormerod, E.A. 1890. A manual of injurious insects. Second edition, London: Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co; Ltd, p 260-64Google Scholar
  84. Ozols, G. 1967. Biologie der Rüsselkäfer der Gattung Hylobius und ihr Einfluss auf die Waldverjüngung in der Lettischen SSR. Les i sredaRiga, 136-163. (In Russian with German summary).Google Scholar
  85. Petersson, M. & Örlander, G. 2003. Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33, 64-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Petersson, M., Örlander, G., & Nilsson, U. 2004. Feeding barriers to reduce damage by pine weevils (Hylobius abietis). Scand J For Res 19, 48-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Pullinen, J. 1989. Mahdollisuuksista ennakoida uudistusalan kasvupaikkatekijöiden perusteella tukkimiehentäin tuhoja männyn taimilla. Helsingfors universitet, pro gradu-arbete, 1-94.Google Scholar
  88. Purrini, K. 1981. Nosema hylobii n. sp., (Nosematidae: Microsporida), a new microsporidian parasite of Hylobius abietis L. (Curculionidae: Coleoptera). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie 92, 1-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Purrini, K., & Ormieres, R., 1982. Gregarina hylobiiand Ophryocystis hylobiin.sp. (Ophryocystidae, Neogregarinida) parasitizing Hylobius abietis(Curculionidae, Coleoptera).. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology. 39, 164-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Pye, A.E., & Burman, M. 1977. Pathogenicity of the nematode Neoaplectana arpocapsa (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae) and certain microorganisms towards the large pine weevil Hylobius abietis(Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Annales Entomologici Fennici 43, 115-19.Google Scholar
  91. Pye A, E., & Pye N, L. 1985. Different applications of the insect parasitic nematode Neoaplectana arpocapsa to control the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Nematologica 31, 109-16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Ratzeburg, J.T.C. 1839. Die Forst-Insekten, Erster Teil, Die Käfer. Berlin, 247 pp.Google Scholar
  93. Rose, D. 2002. Control of the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis L. unpublished Ph.D Thesis, University of London (Imperial College).Google Scholar
  94. Rothpfeffer, C. 2000. Fält- och laboratoriestudier av pergamentsvampens (Phlebia gigantea) och Resinicium bicolor’seffekt på snytbaggens (Hylobius abietis) föryngring i tallstubbar. Examensarbete i entomologi 1/2000. Handledare: Bo Långström., Jan Weslien och Jan Stenlid. Schindler, U. 1964. Zur Imaginalparasitierung forstlicher Curculionidae. Zeitschrift fur angewandte Entomologie 51, 501-07.Google Scholar
  95. Schlyter, F. & Löfqvist, J. 1998. Kan insekticider mot snytbaggen ersättas med naturliga eller syntetiska “antifeedants”? Kungliga Skogs- och Lantbruksakademiens Tidskrift 137, 51-58.Google Scholar
  96. Selander, J. 1993. Survival model for Pinus sylvestris seedlings at risk from Hylobius abietis.Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 8, 66-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Selander, J. & Kalo, P. 1979. Evaluation of resistance of Scots pine seedlings against the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietisL. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in relation to their monoterpene composition. Silva Fenn. 13:115-30. (In Finnish with English summary).Google Scholar
  98. Selander, J., & Immonen, A. 1992. Effect of fertilization and watering of Scots pine seedlings on the feeding preference of the pine weevil, Hylobius abietisL. Silva Fennica 26, 75-84.Google Scholar
  99. Selander, J., Immonen, A., & Raukko, P. 1990. Resistance of naturally regenerated and nursery-raised Scots pine seedlings to the large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Folia Forestalia 776, 1-19.Google Scholar
  100. Sibul, I., 2000. Abundance and sex ratio of pine weevils, Hylobius abietisandH. pinastri(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in pine clear-cuttings of different ages. In: Development of environmentally friendly plant protection in the Baltic region, L. Metspalu, S. Mitt. (Eds), International Conference, Tartu, Estonia, 28-29 September 2000. Transactions of the Estonian Agricultural University.Google Scholar
  101. Skrzecz, I. 1996. Impact of Phlebia gigantea (Fr.:Fr.) Donk on the colonization of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestrisL.) stumps by the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis L.. Folia Forestalia Polonica 38, 89-101.Google Scholar
  102. Skrzecz, I. 1997. Mechanical and biological methods of the protection of forest plantation and thickets against pest insects. Proceedings of the Symposium on Effectiveness and practical application of biological control in plant protection, Skierniewice, Poland, 18-19 March, 1997, 21-24.Google Scholar
  103. Skrzecz, I. 2003. Non-target insects in the pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL.) traps with Hylodor dispenser. Folia Forestalia Polonica, 45, in press.Google Scholar
  104. Skrzecz, I., & Moore, R. 1997. The attractiveness of pine branches infected with selected wood-colonizing fungi to the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis). In: Gregoire et al(Eds), 146-52.Google Scholar
  105. Slizynski, K. 1969. Perilitus rutilusNees (Hym., Braconidae)- the parasite of the imago of Hylobius abietis L. (Col., Curculionidae) new for the Polish fauna e. Polskie Pismo Ent 39, 406-16.Google Scholar
  106. Stary, P., Sterba, J., & Soldan, T. 1988. Perilitus areolaris G. & H. (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), a parasitoid of the pine weevil Hylobius abietis (L.) in Czechoslovakia. Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca 85, 428-33.Google Scholar
  107. Suomalainen, E. 1942. Parasitenwespen aus Oriorrhynchus ovatus. Annales entomologici Fennici 8, 258.Google Scholar
  108. Szmidt, A., & Korczynski, I. 1983. Summary: Population density of Hylobius abietis L. beetles and their feeding intensity as the prognosis index . Prace Komisji Nauk Rolniczych Komisji Nauk Lesnych 5,:137-44.Google Scholar
  109. Sydow, F. von 1997. Abundance of Pine Weevils (Hylobius abietis) and Damage to Conifer Seedlings in Relation to Silvicultural Practices. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 12, 157-67.Google Scholar
  110. Sydow, F. von, & Örlander, G. 1994. The influence of shelterwood density on Hylobius abietis(L.) occurrence and feeding on planted conifers. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 9, 367-75.Google Scholar
  111. Sydow, F.von & Birgersson, G. 1997. Conifer stump condition and pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) reproduction. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 1254-62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Sylven, H. 1927. Snytbaggarna - studier och fångstförsök. Zusammenfassung: Die Russelkäfer - Studien und Fangversuche. Sv. Skogsvårdsfören. Tidskrift 25, 521-51.Google Scholar
  113. Thorpe, K.V. 1999. The feeding ecology of the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL.) in relation to host plant resistance. University of Ulster, School of Environmental Studies, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  114. Thorsén, Å., Mattsson, S. & Weslien, J. 2001. Influence of stem diameter on the survival and growth of containerized Norway spruce seedlings attacked by pine weevils (Hylobius spp.). Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 16: 54-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Thuresson, T., Samuelsson, H., & Claesson, S. 2003. Konsekvenser av ett förbud mot permetrinbehandling av skogsplantor. Skogsstyrelsen, meddelande 2, 1-65.Google Scholar
  116. Tilles, D.A., Sjodin, K., Nordlander, G., & Eidmann, H.H. 1986. Synergism between ethanol and conifer host volatiles as attractants for the pine weevil Hylobius abietis(L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 79, 970-73.Google Scholar
  117. Voolma, K. 1994. Atraktantpüüniste kasutamine männikärsakate ja juureüraskite arvukuse hindamiseks. (Use of baited ground traps for monitoring pine weevil, Hylobius abietis, and root-colonizing bark beetles). Metsanduslikud Uurimused 26, 96-109.Google Scholar
  118. Voolma, K. 2000. Comparison of two traps used for monitoring large pine weevil populations, Hylobius abietis L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), In: Development of environmentally friendly plant protection in the Baltic region, L. Metspalu S. Mitt (Eds), International Conference Tartu, Estonia, 28-29 September 2000, (Transactions of the Estonian Agricultural University, 209).Google Scholar
  119. Voolma, K. 2001. Harilik männikärsakas (Hylobius abietis L.) Räpina metskonna raiestikel: uurimus atraktantpüünistega. (The large pine weevil, Hylobius abietis L., in the felling areas of the Räpina forest district: a case study with baited ground traps). Metsanduslikud Uurimused 35, 172-78.Google Scholar
  120. Wainhouse, D., Ashburner, R., Ward, E., & Rose, J. 1998. The effect of variation in light and nitrogen on growth and defence in young Sitka spruce. Functional Ecology 12, 561-72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Wainhouse, D., Ashburner, R., Forrest, I., & Boswell, R. 2000. The effect of variation in light and nitrogen on the composition of resin in young Sitka spruce. Silvae genetica 49, 45-49.Google Scholar
  122. Wainhouse, D., Cross, D.J., & Howell, R.S. 1990. The role of lignin as a defence against the spruce bark beetle Dendroctonus micans-Effect on larvae and adults. Oecologia 85, 257-65.Google Scholar
  123. Wainhouse, D., Evans, H., Moore, R., Webber, J., Thorpe, K., & Staley, J. 2002. The integrated forest management programme. Forest Research Annual Report and Accounts 2000-2001, 43-47.Google Scholar
  124. Wainhouse, D., Staley, J., Johnston, J., & Boswell, R. 2004. The effect of environmentally induced changes in young conifers on feeding behaviour and reproductive development of adult Hylobius abietis. Ecological Entomology , in press.Google Scholar
  125. Ward, D. 1988. The large pine weevil: an inevitable forest pest. Res. Note, Forest Service, Research Branch Bray, Ireland 2.Google Scholar
  126. Wegensteiner, R., & Führer, R. 1988. Zur Wirksamkeit von Beauveria bassiana(Bals.) Vuill. gegen Hylobius abietis L (Col: Curculionidae). Entomophaga 33, 339-48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Weslien, J. 1998. Vad kostar snytbaggeskadorna? Kungliga Skogs- och Lantbruksakademiens Tidskrift 137, 19-22.Google Scholar
  128. Wibe, A., Borg-Karlson, A. K., Norin, T., & Mustaparta, H., 1996. Identification of plant volatiles activating the same receptor neurons in the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. Ninth International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships held on 24-30 June 1995 in Gwatt, Switzerland. 80, 39-42.Google Scholar
  129. Wilson, W.L. & Day, K.R. 1994. Spatial variation in damage dispersion, and the relationship between damage intensity and abundance of the pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL). International Journal of Pest Management 40, 46-49.Google Scholar
  130. Wilson, W.L. & Day, K.R. 1995. The comparative effectiveness of chemical traps, and fir, spruce and larch billets, for the estimations of pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL.) density indices. Journal of Applied Entomology, 119, 157-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Wilson, W.L. & Day, K.R. 1996. Variation in the relative abundance of the large pine weevil among Sitka spruce plantation sites. Forestry, 69, 169-71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Wilson, W.L., Day, K.R. & Hart, E.A. 1996. Predicting the extent of damage to conifer seedlings by the pine weevil (Hylobius abietisL.): a preliminary risk model by multiple logistic regression. New Forests, 12, 203-22.Google Scholar
  133. Zumr, V. & Stary, P. 1993. Baited pitfall and flight traps in monitoring Hylobius abietis(L.) (Col. Curculionidae). Journal of Applied Entomology, 115, 454-61.Google Scholar
  134. Zumr, V. & Stary, P. 1994. Seasonal occurrence of Hylobius abietis (L.) (Col., Curculionidae) in different forest environments of a model area. Journal of Applied Entomology, 118, 361-64.Google Scholar
  135. Zumr, V. & Stary, P. 1995. LATEX paint as an antifeedant against Hylobius abietis(L) (Col, Curculionidae) on conifer seedlings. Anz Schadlingsk Pflanz Umwelt 68, 42-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. LÅngstrÖm
    • 1
  • K.R. Day
    • 2
  1. 1.Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesS-750 07 UppsalaSweden
  2. 2.University of UlsterColeraineUK

Personalised recommendations