Dancing the Curriculum: Exploring the Body and Movement in Elementary Schools

  • Liora Bresler
Part of the Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education book series (LAAE, volume 3)

Abstract

School disciplines, academic or those aspiring to be academic, target the mind and cognition, ignoring the body at best and subduing it at worst. A moving body in school is typically regarded as disruptive.1 Yet, there is considerable movement even in the most restrictive classes. Under a certain choreography pupils raise their hands, walk to the board, help the teacher distribute materials, sharpen pencils, go to the bathroom. Such instrumental choreography is in marked contrast to the role of the body in the art worlds of dance and drama. There, the body is cultivated towards highly sophisticated movement for expressive purposes. The dialectic between these contrasting sets of expectations for the body and movement shapes the school discipline of dance. Based on a multiple-year2 qualitative study of three elementary (K-5) dance/drama teachers, I examine the learning opportunities for the body in the operational curriculum with a focus on school dance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. (1992). Ballet and modern dance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Book Company.Google Scholar
  2. Beardsley, M. (1983). Aesthetic definition of art. In H. Curtler (Ed.), What is art education? (pp. 15–29). New York: Haven Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Bowman, W. (1998). Philosophical perspectives on music. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bresler, L. (1991). Armstrong elementary school, Chicago, Illinois. In R. Stake, L. Bresler & L. Mabry (Eds.), Custom & cherishing: The arts in elementary schools (pp. 95–136). CRME, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  5. Bresler, L. (1992a). Dance education in elementary schools. Design for Arts in Education, 93(5), 13–20.Google Scholar
  6. Bresler, L. (1992b). Visual art in primary grades: A portrait and analysis. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bresler, L. (1997). General issues across sites: The role of the arts in unifyying high school curriculum. The College Board/Getty Center for the Arts.Google Scholar
  8. Bresler, L. (1998). The genre of school music and its shaping by meso, micro and macro contexts. Research Studies in Music Education, 11, 2–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bresler, L. (2002). School art as hybrid genre: Institutional contexts for art curriculum. In L. Bresler & C. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children ’s lives: Context, culture, and curriculum (pp. 169–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Broudy, H. (1972). Enlightened cherishing: An essay on aesthetic education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burrows, D. (1990). Sound, speech, and music. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  12. Choksy, L., Abramson, R. M., Gillespie, A., Woods, D., & York, F. (2001). Teaching music in the twenty—first century (2nd ed.). Toronto: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Costantino, T. E. (in press). The impact of philanthropy on arts education policy. Arts Education Policy Review, 105(1). Google Scholar
  14. Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeeling brain. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  15. Danto, A. (1999). The body/body problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: MacMillianGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisner, E. (1982). Cognition and curriculum: A basis for deciding what to teach. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  19. Espeland, M. (1997). Once upon a time there was a minister: An unfinished story about reform in Norwegian arts education. Arts Education Policy Review, 99(1), 11–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fitt, S. (1996). Dance kinesiology (2nd ed.). New York: Schirmer.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  22. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Geertz, C. (1976). Art as a cultural system. MLN, 91, 1473–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanna, J. L. (1999). Partnering dance and education: Intelligent moves for changing times. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  25. Hirsch, E. D. (1987). Cultural literacy. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  26. Housen, A., Arenas, A., & Yenawine, P. (1994). Visual thinking curriculum. New York: Museum of Modem Art. Distributed through Department of Education (MoMA) and Development through Art, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Kimball, M. M. (1994). Writing standards for dance. In “The vision for arts education in the 21st century: The ideas and ideals behind the development ofthe National Standards for education in the arts ” (pp. 32–35). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.Google Scholar
  28. Knowles, P. (1982). The emerging role of dance in American education: 1807–1982. Paper presented at the VII International Conference on Sport and Dance, University of Queensland, Bisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Knowles, P. (1998). Connecting to the legacy ofthe past. NASD President’s Report, Tuscon, Arizona.Google Scholar
  30. Knowles, P., & Sande, R. (1991). Dance education in American public schools (case studies). Urbana, IL: Council of Research in Music Education.Google Scholar
  31. Kraus, R. (1969). History of the dance in art and education. Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  32. Kraus, S., Hilsendager, S., & Dixon, B. (1991). History of the dance in art and education. Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Madeja, S. (1977). Arts and aesthetics: An agenda foor the future. St. Louis, Missouri: CEMREL.Google Scholar
  35. Madeja, S. (1978). The arts, cognition, and basic skills. St. Louis, Missouri: CEMREL.Google Scholar
  36. Marques, I. (in press). Contribution of school art curricula to quality education in Latin America and the Caribbean. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  37. McPherson, G. (1995). Integrating the arts into the general curriculum: An Australian perspective. Arts Education Policy Review, 97(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nespor, J. (1997). Tangled up in school: Politics, space, bodies, and signs in the educational process. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Paynter, J. (1982). Sound and silence: Classroom projects in creative music. London: Cambridge U.P.Google Scholar
  40. Schafer, M. (1975). Rhinoceroes in the classroom. Wien: Universal Edition.Google Scholar
  41. Sizer, T. (1996). Horace ’s hope: What works foor the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, R. (1994). General knowledge and arts education. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sparshott, F. (1995). A measured pace: Toward a philosophical understanding of the arts of dance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stake, R., Bresler, L., & Mabry, L. (1991). Custom and cherishing : Arts education in the United States. CRME, Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  45. Stinson, S. W. (1990). Dance and the developing child. In W. J. Stinson (Ed.), Moving and learning for the whole child (pp. 139–150). Reston, VA: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation & Dance.Google Scholar
  46. Stinson, S. (1995). Body of knowledge. Educational Theory, 45(1), 43–54.Google Scholar
  47. Stinson, S. (2002). What we teach is who we are: The stories of our lives. In L. Bresler & C. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives: Context, culture, and curriculum (pp. 169–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  48. United States Department of Education (2003). No Child Left Behind Act.Google Scholar
  49. Vygotsky, L. S. (1979). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  50. Wiggins, J. (2000). Teaching for musical understanding. Boston: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  51. Wright, L. (1994). Writing standards for Theater. In The vision for arts education in the 21st century: The ideas and ideals behind the development of the National Standards for Education in the Arts (pp. 36–39). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Liora Bresler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations