Abstract

Anglo-French relations have, over the centuries, been characterised by mutual suspicion and antagonism, punctuated by brief periods of détente.2 As Nicholas Rostow has put it,

Language, history, even differences in government structure, emphasised that the British and French were distinct peoples of definite character. They looked at the world differently. To different habits of mind and government, the past added strands of rivalry and cooperation which were revealed in contradictory feelings and attitudes in both countries.3

Keywords

Prime Minister Foreign Policy Weimar Republic Nations Affair British Army 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Quoted in John Robert Ferris, The Evolution of British Strategic Policy, 1919–26 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989), p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    P.M.H. Bell, France and Britain 1900–1940: Entente and Estrangement (London and New York: Longman, pbk, 1996), p. 6. The following account is based on this excellent study. For French policy in this period, seeGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthony Adamthwaite, Grandeur and Misery: France’s Bid for Power in Europe, 1914–1940 (London: Edward Arnold, 1995).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Nicholas Rostow, Anglo-French Relations 1934–1936 (London: Macmillan, 1984), p. 7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    For details of Anglo-French disputes over strategy on the Western Front, see William James Philpott, Anglo-French Relations and Strategy on the Western Front, 1914–1918 (London: Macmillan 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curzon at a meeting of the eastern committee, 2 December 1918, quoted in John Noble Fisher, ‘Curzon and British War Imperialism in the Middle East, 1916–1919’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leeds, 1995, pp. 382–3.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    Quoted in Michael Dockrill, ‘Britain, the United States, and France and the German Settlement, 1918–1920’, in B.J.C. McKercher and D.J. Moss (eds.), Shadow and Substance in British Foreign Policy, 1919–1939: Memorial Essays Honouring C.J. Lowe (Alberta: the University of Alberta Press, 1984), p. 203.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    See Correlli Barnett, The Collapse of British Power (Gloucester: Alan Sutton, pbk, 1987 reprint), pp. 318ff.Google Scholar
  9. There is an immense literature on the Paris Peace Conference. See Alan Sharp, The Versailles Settlement: Peacemaking in Paris, 1919 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991);Google Scholar
  10. Michael L. Dockrill and J. Douglas Goold, Peace without Promise: Britain and the Peace Conferences 1919–1923 (London: Batsford, 1981);Google Scholar
  11. Howard Elcock, Portrait of a Decision: The Council of Four and the Treaty of Versailles (London: Eyre Methuen, 1972);Google Scholar
  12. A. Lentin, Lloyd George, Woodrow Wilson and the Guilt of Germany: An essay in the pre-history of appeasement (Leicester University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Quoted in Correlli Barnett, The Collapse of British Power (Gloucester: Alan Sutton, pbk, 1987), p. 330.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Quoted in John C. Cairns, ‘A Nation of Shopkeepers in Search of a Suitable France, 1919–1940’, in The American Historical Review no. 3, vol. 79, 1974. This amusing and scholarly article should be consulted for further British opinions of the French in the period.Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    For a detailed discussion of this subject, see Carolyn Judith Kitching, ‘Britain and the Problem of International Disarmament, 1919–1934’, Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Teesside, 1995.Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    Quoted in Keith Robbins, Munich 1938 (London: Cassell, 1968), p. 108.Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    A.J.P. Taylor, English History, 1914–1945 (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1965), p. 215.Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    Anthony Adamthwaite, France and the Coming of the Second World War (London: Frank Cass, 1977), pp. 17ff.Google Scholar
  19. 28.
    For details, see Philippe Bernard and Henri Dubief, The Decline of the Third Republic, 1914–1938 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  20. See also Eugen Weber’s fine study, The Hollow Years: France in the 1930s (New York: W.W. Norton, 1994), Chapter II.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    Weber, pp. 245–56. For a meticulously researched and well-written account of French defence policies in these years, see Martin S. Alexander, The Republic in Danger: General Maurice Gamelin and the Politics of French Defence, 1933–1940 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  22. See also Robert J. Young, In Command of France: French Foreign Policy and Military Planning 1933–1939 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 31.
    For details, see Paul Stafford, ‘Political Autobiography and the Art of the Plausible: R.A. Butler at the Foreign Office’, Historical Journal, 28 (4), 1985, pp. 901–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 32.
    Martin Gilbert and Richard Gott, The Appeasers (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1963), p. 78.Google Scholar
  25. 35.
    Robert Rhodes James, Chips: The Diaries of Sir Henry Channon (London: Weidenfeld, 1993, diary entry, 22 March 1939, p. 188 (hereafter referred to as Channon Diaries).Google Scholar
  26. 36.
    Quoted in J.A. Cross, Sir Samuel Hoare, a Political Biography (London: Jonathan Cape, 1977), p. 188.Google Scholar
  27. 38.
    For an excellent biography, see Norman Rose, Vansittart: Study of a Diplomat (London: Heinemann, 1978).Google Scholar
  28. See also Special Section on ‘Robert Vansittart and an Unbrave World, 1930–37’, in Diplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 6, March 1995, No. 1, pp. 1–175;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. and Ian Colvin, Vansittart in Office (London: Gollancz, 1965).Google Scholar
  30. 40.
    Brian McKercher, ‘Old Diplomacy and New: the Foreign Office and Foreign Policy, 1919–1939’, in Michael Dockrill and Brian McKercher (eds.), Diplomacy and World Power: Studies in British Foreign Policy 1980–1950 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966). Rose, p. 112.Google Scholar
  31. 53.
    David Dilks (ed.), The Diaries of Sir Alexander Cadogan, 1938–1945 (London: Cassell, 1971), entry 29 April 1938, pp. 73–74 (hereafter Cadogan Diaries).Google Scholar
  32. 67.
    For Phipps, see John Herman, ‘The Paris Embassy of Sir Eric Phipps, 1937–1939’, unpublished PhD thesis, the London School of Economics, April 1996.Google Scholar
  33. See also Donald Cameron Watt, ‘Chamberlain’s Ambassadors’, pp. 136–70. For an earlier discussion of Henderson, see Felix Gilbert, ‘Two British Ambassadors: Perth and Henderson’, in Gordon A. Craig and Felix Gilbert, The Diplomats 1919–1939 2 vols (New York: Atheneum, 1965), Vol. 2, pp. 537–54.Google Scholar
  34. 71.
    For further details, see Richard Cockett, Twilight of Truth: Chamberlain, Appeasement and the Manipulation of the Press (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1989), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
  35. 74.
    David Dutton, Anthony Eden: a Life and Reputation (London: Edward Arnold, 1997) p. 41.Google Scholar
  36. 76.
    For a more sympathetic portrayal, see David Dutton, Simon: a Political Biography of Sir John Simon (London: Aurum Press, 1992), on which I have relied for the following information about Simon.Google Scholar
  37. 78.
    John Harvey (ed.), The Diplomatic Diaries of Oliver Harvey, 1937–1940 (London: Collins, 1970). Diary entry 15 October 1937, p. 15 (hereafter Harvey Diaries).Google Scholar
  38. 81.
    For a recent biography, see Andrew Roberts ‘The Holy Fox’: A Biography of Lord Halifax (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1991).Google Scholar
  39. 83.
    Kenneth Young (ed.), The Diaries of Sir Robert Bruce Lockhart, 1915–1938, Vol. 1 1915–1938 (London: Macmillan, 1973), p. 49.Google Scholar
  40. 90.
    Keith Feiling, The Life of Neville Chamberlain (London: Macmillan, 1946).Google Scholar
  41. For two recent analyses, see R.A.C. Parker, Chamberlain and Appeasement: British Policy and the Coming of the Second World War (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. and J.D. Charmley, Chamberlain and the Lost Peace (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1989).Google Scholar
  43. 92.
    See Stephen Roskill, Hankey: Man of Secrets, 3 vols (London: Collins, 1974).Google Scholar
  44. 94.
    David Carlton, Anthony Eden: a Biography (London: Allen Lane, 1981), p. 87.Google Scholar
  45. 95.
    Eunan O’Halpin, Head of the Civil Service: a Study of Warren Fisher (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 245.Google Scholar
  46. 96.
    For a full account of this debate, see Brian Bond, British Military Policy between the Two World Wars (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980), Chapter 7.Google Scholar
  47. 99.
    N.H. Gibbs, Grand Strategy: Volume 1, Rearmament Policy (London: HMSO, 1976) p. 611, footnote.Google Scholar
  48. 100.
    Rothermere to Churchill, 7 October 1937, in Martin Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill, Vol. V, Companion, Part 3, Documents: The Coming of the War, 1931–39 (London: Heinemann, 1982), pp. 865–6.Google Scholar
  49. 102.
    Max Egremont, Under Two Flags: The Life of Major General Sir Edward Spears (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1997), pp. 135 and 143.Google Scholar
  50. 106.
    Gilbert and Gott, The Appeasers p. 8; John Turner, ‘Introduction: Lord Lothian and His World’, in John Turner (ed.), The Larger Idea: Lord Lothian and the Problem of National Sovereignty (London: The Historians’ Press, 1988), pp. 13–15. For a sympathetic biographyGoogle Scholar
  51. see J.R.M. Butler, Lord Lothian, 1882–1940 (London, Macmillan, 1960).Google Scholar
  52. 107.
    E.L. Ellis, T.J.: A Life of Dr Thomas Jones, CH. (Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1992), pp. 398–421.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael Dockrill 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Dockrill
    • 1
  1. 1.King’s CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations