Advertisement

Transforming a Party State into a Democracy

  • Steve Tsang
Part of the St Antony’s book series

Abstract

Although Taiwan had one of the most anti-communist governments in the world its political system, prior to its democratization in 1986, resembled that in communist countries such as the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or the former Soviet Union. The majority of existing works suggest that its ruling party, the Kuomintang (KMT), was quasi-Leninist or was organized along Leninist lines.1 Leninist or not, the KMT started a process of democratization by which it dismantled itself as a party state, transformed the political system into a democracy and itself into a democratic party within ten years. This occurred while Taiwan continued to grow rapidly economically and maintained social order and political stability. Since the KMT has also managed to retain political power through open and fair elections this ‘quiet revolution’ should provide a shining example for Leninist party states which may contemplate political changes.2 It appears that the KMT experience should have particular relevance for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) state in the PRC.3

Keywords

Chinese Communist Party Democratic Progressive Party Party State Political Officer Taiwan Strait 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See for example B.J. Dickson, ‘The Lessons of Defeat: The Reorganization of the Kuomintang on Taiwan, 1950–52’, The China Quarterly, no. 133, March 1993, 56–84; Tun-jen Cheng, ‘Democratizing the Quasi-Leninist Regime in Taiwan’, World Politics, vol. 41, July 1989, 471–99; CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. J.A. Robinson, ‘The KMT as a Leninist Regime: Prolegomenon to Devolutionary Leadership Through Institutions’, The Political Chronicle: The Journal of the Florida Political Science Association, vol. 3, no. 1, 1991, 1–8; andGoogle Scholar
  3. C.S. Meaney, ‘Liberalization, Democratization, and the Role of the KMT’, in T.J. Cheng and S. Haggard (eds), Political Change in Taiwan (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1992) 95.Google Scholar
  4. Hung-mao Tien also describes the Kuomintang as organized on the Leninist model though he stresses that it was committed to a different ideology: Hung-mao Tien, The Great Transition: Political and Social Change in the Republic of China (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1989), 1. For a dissenting view which describes the Kuomintang as a political sect, seeGoogle Scholar
  5. R.H. Myers and L. Chao, ‘A New Kind of Party: The Kuomintang of 1949–1952’, in Proceedings of Centennial Symposium on Sun Yat-sen’s Founding of the Kuomintang for Revolution Volume IV: Republic of China on Taiwan (1950–1993) (Taipei: Chin-tao Chung-kuo ch’u-pan-she, 1995), 26–44.Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    The term is borrowed from Jason Hu (ed.), Quiet Revolutions in Taiwan (Taipei: Kwang Hwa Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    This question has also been explored in part by B.J. Dickson in ‘The Kuomintang before Democratization: Organizational Change and the Role of Elections’, in Hung-mao Tien (ed.), Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition: Riding the Third Wave (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996), 42–78.Google Scholar
  8. 4.
    Ch’in Hsiao-i (comp.), Tsung-t’ung Chiang Kung ssu-hsiang yen-lun tsungchi: yen-chiang, vol. 24 (Taipei: Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang tang-shih wei-yuan-hui, 1984) (hereafter: Chiang Kai-shek, Tsung-chi), 46.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Steve Tsang, ‘Revitalising the Revolution: Chiang Kai-shek’s Approach to Political Reform in the 1950s’, in Proceedings of Centennial Symposium on Sun Yat-sen’s Founding of the Kuomintang for Revolution Volume IV: Republic of China on Taiwan (1950–1993) (Taipei: Chin-tao Chung-kuo ch’u-pan-she, 1995), 49.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Chiang and his wife reportedly kept cyanide capsules with them and prepared themselves to perish with Taiwan if necessary. K.C. Wu, Wu Kuo-chen Chuan (Taipei: Tzu-yu Shih-pao, 1995), 50.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Harry S. Truman Library (Independence, Missouri), Archives of Harry S. Truman, President’s Secretary’s Papers Box 257, ORE7–50, 20 March 1950, 3. For a study of the US policy of waiting until the dust settles, see Nancy Tucker, Pattern in the Dust: Chinese-American Relations and the Recognition Controversy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu Cheng, Lei Chen yu Cheng-tang Cheng-chi (Taipei: Kuei-kuan T’u-shu, 1989), 84.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    See Ch’en T’ieh-chien and Huang Tao-hsuan, Chiang Chieh-shih yu Chung-kuo Wen-hua (Hong Kong: Chung-hua shu-ch’u, 1992).Google Scholar
  14. 26.
    S.H. Chang and L.H.D. Gordon, All Under Heaven: Sun Yat-sen and His Revolutionary Thought (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1991), 121.Google Scholar
  15. 31.
    R.H. Myers (ed.), Two Societies in Opposition: The Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China After forty years (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1991), xviii.Google Scholar
  16. 34.
    Reproduced in English in S.R. Schram, The Political Thought of Mao Tse-tung (New York: Praeger Publishers, 1969), 313.Google Scholar
  17. 39.
    For a comparative study of the Kuomintang and Chinese communist political officer/commissar system, see Cheng Hsiao-shih, Party-Military Relations in the PRC and Taiwan: Paradoxes of Control (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1990).Google Scholar
  18. 44.
    Kang Lu-tao, Li Kuo-ting K’ou-shu Li-shih (Taipei: Cho-yueh wen-hua, 1993), 142–3, 172.Google Scholar
  19. 45.
    K.T. Li, The Evolution of Policy Behind Taiwan’s Development Success (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1988), 54.Google Scholar
  20. 48.
    This concept is being defined in a slightly different way by Ramon Myers as ‘the zone that contains power, symbols, and institutions that allocate and project power’ but is ‘constrained by the existence of economic and ideological marketplaces’ . Ramon Myers, ‘Transferring the Republic of China’s Modernisation Experience to the People’s Republic of China’, in G. Klintworth (ed.), Taiwan in the Asia-Pacific in the 1990s (St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin, 1994), 172.Google Scholar
  21. 50.
    Hermann Halbeisen, ‘In Search of a New Political Order? Political Reform in Taiwan’, in Steve Tsang (ed.), In the Shadow of China: Political Developments in Taiwan since 1949 (London: Hurst & Co., 1993), 75.Google Scholar
  22. 52.
    Li Sung-lin, Chiang Chieh-shih te T’ai-wan Shih-tai (Taipei: Feng-yun shih-tai, 1993), 372.Google Scholar
  23. 53.
    Tun-jen Cheng & Stephen Haggard, ‘Regime Transformation in Taiwan’, in T.J. Cheng & S. Haggard (eds), Political Change in Taiwan (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1992), 7.Google Scholar
  24. 55.
    Cheng Mu-hsin, T’ai-wan I-hui Cheng-chi Ssu-shih-nien (Taipei: Chih-li wan-pao ch’u-pan-she, 1987), 147 and 152.Google Scholar
  25. 57.
    For a graphic insider’ s account of how local elections were manipulated by the party state, see Kao Ming-fei, Ch’ing-chih Tan-an (Taipei: Business Weekly, 1995), 49–158.Google Scholar
  26. 58.
    Yun-han Chu, Crafting Democracy in Taiwan (Taipei: Institute for National Policy Research, 1992), 50.Google Scholar
  27. 67.
    Lei’s writings on the question of democracy published in the Free China Fortnightly are now readily accessible in Fu Cheng (ed.), Lei Chen yu Min-chu Hsien-cheng (2 vols), (Taipei: Kuei-kuan T’u-shu, 1989).Google Scholar
  28. 69.
    Ma Chih-su, Lei Chan yu Chiang Chieh-shih (Taipei: Tsu-li Wan-pao, 1993), 232–9.Google Scholar
  29. 71.
    H.E. Salisbury, The New Emperors: China in the Era of Mao and Deng (New York: Avon Books, 1992), 137;Google Scholar
  30. R. MacFarquhar, The Origins of the Cultural Revolution 1: Contradictions Among the People 1956–1957 (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), 314.Google Scholar
  31. 80.
    Lih-wu Han, Taiwan Today (Taipei: Cheng Chung Book Company, 1988), 260; The Republic of China Yearbook 1995, 336. Google Scholar
  32. 83.
    Ironically, the best insider account of how the Kuomintang did so is the memoirs of a Taiwanese Independence activist, Peng Ming-min. See Peng Ming-min, A Taste of Freedom: Memoirs of a Formosan Independence Leader (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1972).Google Scholar
  33. 86.
    Harvey Feldman, ‘A New Kind of Relationship’ , in R.H. Myers (ed.), A Unique Relationship: The United States and the Republic of China Under the Taiwan Relations Act (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1989), 41.Google Scholar
  34. 87.
    Jaushieh Joseph Wu, Taiwan’s Democratization: Forces Behind the New Momentum (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1995), 40–1.Google Scholar
  35. 88.
    Yung Yuan, Wo tsai Chiang Chieh-shih Fu-tzu Shen-pien teh Jih-tzu (Taipei: Shu-hua ch’u-pan-she, 1994), 261–2, 266–70.Google Scholar
  36. 89.
    Hau Pei-ts’ un, Hao Tsung-chang Jih-chi chung te Ching- kuo Hsien-sheng Wan-nien (Taipei: Tien-hsia wen-hua, 1995), 213–45, 260.Google Scholar
  37. 90.
    Chiao Chiao Hsieh, Strategy for Survival: The Foreign Policy and External Relations of the Republic of China on Taiwan, 1949–79 (London: The Sherwood Press, 1985), Appendix 4b.Google Scholar
  38. 92.
    Steven W. Mosher, China Misperceived: American Illusions and Chinese Reality (n.p: New Republic Book, 1990), 194.Google Scholar
  39. 93.
    Kuo Li-min (ed.), Chung-kung Tui-t’ai Cheng-ts’e Tzu- liao Hsuan-chi, vol. 2, (Taipei: Yung-yeh ch’u-pan-she, 1992), 328–31.Google Scholar
  40. 94.
    Li Sung-lin, Chiang Ching-kuo te T’ai-wan shih-tai (Taipei: Feng-yun shih-tai, 1993), 87.Google Scholar
  41. 95.
    For the negotiations see Robert Cottrell, The End of Hong Kong: The Secret Diplomacy of /mperial Retreat (London: John Murray, 1993), andGoogle Scholar
  42. S. Tsang, Hong Kong: Appointment with China (London: I. B. Tauris, 1997), 81–110.Google Scholar
  43. 97.
    Simon Long, Taiwan: China’s Last Frontier (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1991), 180.Google Scholar
  44. 99.
    P.H. Chang, ‘Changing Nature of Taiwan’s Politics’, in D.F. Simon and M.Y.M. Kau (eds.), Taiwan: Beyond the Economic Miracle (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1992), 31.Google Scholar
  45. 100.
    Term coined by Bill Jenner in W.J.F. Jenner, The Tyranny of History: The Roots of China’s Crisis (London: Penguin, 1992).Google Scholar
  46. 108.
    Archie Brown, The Gorbachev Factor (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), 310.Google Scholar
  47. 109.
    Examples of such publications include: Kuo Chuan-erh (ed.), Chung-kuo Kuo-min-tang T’ai-wan Szu-shih nien Shih- kang (Peking: Chung-kuo wen-shih ch’u-pan-she, 1993);Google Scholar
  48. T’ai-wan Yen-chiu-hui (ed.) Chiu-shih Nien-tai chih T’ai-wan (Peking: You-i Ch’u-pan, 1993); andGoogle Scholar
  49. Sung Ch’un and Lou Chieh, ‘Lung Kuo-min-tang te ti-i-ch’i kai-tsao yun-tung’, in T’ai-wan Yen-chiu, 1989, no. 3.Google Scholar
  50. 111.
    Kenneth Liberthal, Governing China: From Revolution Through Reform (New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1995), 453.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steven Tsang 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Tsang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations