Rational Just Social Choice

  • Serge-Christophe Kolm
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

In this paper, I set out what I believe should be done in the domain of good social choice, or social ethics, and explain why. My proposal is in a sense the least original possible since its maxim is the central ethic of modernity and has been the basic principle of liberal-democratic societies for two centuries: ‘men are free and equal in rights’. Yet, first, this ethic and its specification and applications are derived by necessity from pure reason alone, and these derivations require a number of elaborate analyses. Second, this approach is on the contrary very original in the eyes of groups of scholars who see a very different conception as obvious and natural — such as utilitarianism or the aggregation of preference orderings. Third, even well-known theories that could be parts of the general view present serious shortcomings, such as justifications by an ‘original position’, ‘full process liberalism’ by-passing market failures, or omission of exchange capacities from ideally equalized productive capacities. Therefore, I can make my position understood only by beginning by explaining why I have to depart from all these well-worked-out views. And both this justification and the full understanding of the reason and of the contribution of these theories require placing them in the history of modern thought.

Keywords

Social Choice Preference Ordering Social Welfare Function Social Optimum Primary Good 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arrow, K. J. (1951) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn 1963 (New York: Wiley).Google Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1977) ‘Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 219–25.Google Scholar
  3. Bergson, A. (1966) Essays in Normative Economics (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentham, J. (1843) The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Bowring, J. (ed.) (Edinburgh: William Tait).Google Scholar
  5. Dworkin, R. (1981) ‘What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare’ and ‘Part 2: Equality of Resources’, Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 10, pp. 185–246 and pp. 283–345.Google Scholar
  6. Foley, D. (1967) ‘Resource Allocation in the Public Sector’, Yale Economic Essays, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–98.Google Scholar
  7. Goodin, R. (1986) ‘Laundering Preferences’, in Elster, J. and Hylland, A. (eds), Foundations of Social Choice Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Halévy, E. (1901) La jeunesse de Bentham, in La formation du radicalisme philosophique, vol. 1 (Paris: Alcan).Google Scholar
  9. Hammond, P. J. (1976) ‘Equity, Arrow’s Conditions, and Rawls’ Difference Principle’, Econometrica, vol. 44, pp. 793–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harsanyi, J. C. (1953) ‘Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 61, pp. 434–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harsanyi, J. C. (1955) ‘Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethic, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 63, pp. 309–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hart, H. L. A. (1982) Essays on Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory (Oxford: Clarendon Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolm, S.-C. (1964) Les fondements de l’Economie Publique: Introduction à la théorie du rôle économique de l’Etat (Paris: IFP).Google Scholar
  14. Kolm, S.-C. (1968) ‘The Optimal Production of Social Justice’ in Guitton, H. and Margolis, J. (eds), Economie Publique (Paris: CNRS), pp. 109–77 andGoogle Scholar
  15. (1969) Public Economics (London: Macmillan), pp. 145–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kolm, S.-C. (1969) ‘Théorie démocratique de la justice sociale’, Revue d’Economie Politique, no. 1, pp. 138–41.Google Scholar
  17. Kolm, S.-C. (1971) Justice et Equité (Paris: CEPREMAP); reprinted 1972 (Paris: CNRS).Google Scholar
  18. Kolm, S.-C. (1973a) ‘Super-équité’, Kyklos, vol. 26, fasc. 4, pp. 841–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kolm, S.-C. (1973b) More Equal Distribution of Bundles of Commodities (Paris: CEPREMAP).Google Scholar
  20. Kolm, S.-C. (1974) ‘Sur les conséquences économiques des principes de justice et de justice pratique’, Revue d’Economie Politique, no. 1, pp. 80–107.Google Scholar
  21. Kolm, S.-C. (1976a) ‘Unequal Inequalities, I’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 416–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kolm, S.-C. (1976b) ‘Unequal Inequalities, II’, Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 82–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolm, S.-C. (1977a) ‘Multidimensional Egalitarianism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 91, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kolm, S.-C. (1977b) La Transition Socialiste (Paris: Editions du Cerf).Google Scholar
  25. Kolm, S.-C. (1977c) Les Elections sont-elles la Démocratic? (Paris: Editions du Cerf).Google Scholar
  26. Kolm, S.-C. (1980) ‘Choix social, choix collectif, optimum social’, Revue d’Economie Politique, no. 4, pp. 246–54.Google Scholar
  27. Kolm, S.-C. (1982) Le Bonheur-Liberté, augmented edition 1994 (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  28. Kolm, S.-C. (1984a) Le Libéralisme Moderne (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  29. Kolm, S.-C. (1984b) La Bonne Economie: La Réciprocité Générale (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  30. Kolm, S.-C. (1985a) Le Contrat Social Libéral: théorie et pratique du libéralisme (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  31. Kolm, S.-C. (1985b) ‘Libres, égaux et fraternels: la logique profonde de la morale républicaine’, Revue française de Science Politique, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 639–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolm, S.-C. (1986) Philosophie de l’Economie (Paris: Editions du Seuil).Google Scholar
  33. Kolm, S.-C. (1987a) L’Homme Pluridimensionnel (Paris: Albin Michel).Google Scholar
  34. Kolm, S.-C. (1987b) ‘The Freedom and Consensus Normative Theory of the State: The Liberal Social Contract’, in Koslowski, P. (ed.), Individual Liberty and Democratic Decision-Making: The Ethics, Economics and Politics of Democracy (Tüubingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck)), pp. 97–127.Google Scholar
  35. Kolm, S.-C. (1987c) ‘Public Economics’, in Eatwell, J., Milligate, M. and Newman, P. (eds), New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics (London: Macmillan), pp. 1047–55.Google Scholar
  36. Kolm, S.-C. (1987d) ‘Adequation, Equity and Fundamental Dominance’, no. 59, CERAS.Google Scholar
  37. Kolm, S.-C. (1987e) ‘Libéralismes classiques et renouvelés’, in Ory, P. (ed.), Nouvelle histoire des idées politiques (Paris: Hachette), pp. 575–87.Google Scholar
  38. Kolm, S.-C. (1989a) ‘Free and Equal in Rights; The Philosophies of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen’, paper presented at the bicentennial conference, of the Canadian Political Science Association, Québec, andGoogle Scholar
  39. (1991) Journal of Regional Policy, no. 1, pp. 5–62.Google Scholar
  40. Kolm, S.-C. (1989b) ‘The Psychology of Happiness and of Liberty’, The Journal of Oriental studies, The Institute of Oriental Philosophy, Tokyo, vol. 2, pp. 11–20.Google Scholar
  41. Kolm, S.-C. (1990) The General Theory of Justice (Paris: CERAS).Google Scholar
  42. Kolm, S.-C. (1991a) ‘The Normative Economics of Unammity and Equality: Equity, Adequacy and Fundamental Dominance’, in Arrow, K. J. (ed.), Markets and Welfare (London: Macmillan), pp. 243–86.Google Scholar
  43. Kolm, S.-C. (1991b) ‘The Ethical Economics of Envy’, German Bernacer Lecture, University of Alicante, no. 90, CERAS.Google Scholar
  44. Kolm, S.-C. (1991c) ‘Super-Equity’, German Bernacer Lecture, University of Alicante, no. 98, CERAS.Google Scholar
  45. Kolm, S.-C. (1992a) Full Process Liberalism, IMF working paper, Division of Fiscal Affairs, IMF and (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  46. Kolm, S.-C. (1992b) What Sense Social Choice? (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  47. Kolm, S.-C. (1992c) The Impossibility of Utilitarianism (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  48. Kolm, S.-C. (1993a) ‘Free and Equal in Rights: The Philosophies of the 1789 Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen’, Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 158–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kolm, S.-C. (1993b) ‘Distributive Justice’, in Goodin, R. and Pettit, P. (eds), A Companion to Political Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 438–61.Google Scholar
  50. Kolm, S.-C. (1993c) ‘The Impossibility of Utilitarianism’, in Koslowski, P. and Shionoya, Y. (eds), The Good and the Economical (Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag), pp. 30–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kolm, S.-C. (1993d) Efficient Economic Justice (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  52. Kolm, S.-C. (1993e) Equal Liberty (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  53. Kolm, S.-C. (1993f) The Economics of Envy (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  54. Kolm, S.-C. (1994a) ‘L’égalité de la liberté’, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, vol. 1, pp. 81–6.Google Scholar
  55. Kolm, S.-C. (1994b) ‘Rational Normative Economics against Social Choice and Social Welfare’, European Economic Review, vol. 38, pp. 721–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kolm, S.-C. (1994c) ‘The Meaning of Fundamental Preferences’, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 11, pp. 193–8.Google Scholar
  57. Kolm, S.-C. (1994d) ‘The Theory of Reciprocity and of the Choice of Economic Systems’, Investigaciones Economicas, vol. XVIII, no. 1, pp. 67–95.Google Scholar
  58. Kolm, S.-C. (1994e) ‘Meanings and Rationalities in Social Choice’ in Andler, D., Banerjee, P., Chaudhury, M. and Guillaume, O. (eds), Rationality in Social Sciences (Delhi: Sage).Google Scholar
  59. Kolm, S.-C. (1994f) ‘The Logic of Justice’, in Eichhorn, W. (ed), Measurement in Welfare and Inequalities (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), pp. 970–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kolm, S.-C. (1995a) ‘The Economics of Social Sentiments: The Case of Envy’, The Japanese Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kolm, S.-C. (1995b) ‘Economic Justice: The Central Problem’, European Economic Review, vol. 39, pp. 661–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kolm, S.-C. (1995c) ‘The Modern Theory of Justice’, L’Année Sociologique, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 297–315.Google Scholar
  63. Kolm, S.-C. (1995d) ‘Risk and Justice: Harsanyi’s Enigma’s and Social Policy’ (Paris: CGPC).Google Scholar
  64. Kolm, S.-C. (1996a) ‘The Theory of Justice’, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 13, pp. 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kolm, S.-C. (1996b) ‘Moral Public Choice’, Public Choice, vol. 87, pp. 117–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Kolm, S.-C. (1996c) Modern Theories of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  67. Kolm, S.-C. (1996d) ‘Playing Fair with Fairness’, forthcoming in Journal of Economic Surveys.Google Scholar
  68. Le Breton, M. (1997) ‘Arrovian Social Choice on Economic Domains,’ in Arrow, K. J. et al. (eds), Social Choice Re-examined, Vol. 1 (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  69. Little, I. M. D. (1951) ‘Social Choice and Individual Values’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 60, pp. 422–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mill, J. S. (1862) Utilitarianism, On Liberty, Essay on Bentham in Warnock, M. (ed.) (1962) (London: Fontana Library).Google Scholar
  71. Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  72. Pareto, V. (1913) ‘Il massimo di utilità per una collettività’, Giornale degli economisti, vol. 46, pp. 337–8.Google Scholar
  73. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  74. Rawls, J. (1993) Justice et Démocracie (Paris: Edition du Seuil).Google Scholar
  75. Roberts, K. (1980) ‘Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels’, and ‘Interpersonal Comparability and Social Choice Theory’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 47, pp. 409–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roemer, J. (1986) ‘Equality of Resources Implies Equality of Welfare’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 101, pp. 751–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rousseau, J.-J. (1762) Du Contrat Social, translated by Cole, G. D. H. (1913) (London: Dent).Google Scholar
  78. Sidgwick, H. (1874) The Method of Ethics (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  79. Suppes, P. (1957) ‘Two Formal Models for Moral Principles’, technical report no. 15, Office of Naval Research Contract, Applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.Google Scholar
  80. Tinbergen, J. (1946) Redelijke Inkomensverdeling (Reasonable Income Distribution) (Haarlem: De Gulden Pers).Google Scholar
  81. Tinbergen, J. (1957) ‘Welfare Economics and Income Distribution’, American Economic Review, vol. 47, pp. 490–503.Google Scholar
  82. Tobin, J. (1970) ‘On Limiting the Domain of Inequality’, Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 13, pp. 363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Walras, L. (1898) Etudes d’Economie sociale, new edition 1936 (Lausanne: F. Rouge, and Paris: F. Pichon).Google Scholar
  84. Walzer, M. (1983) Spheres of Justice (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  85. Weymark, J. (1993) ‘Harsanyi’s Social Aggregation Theorem and the Weak Pareto Principle’, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 10, pp. 209–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Weymark, J. (1996) ‘Discussion of Kolm’s paper,’ this volume, pp. 197–201.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Serge-Christophe Kolm
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Advanced Studies in the Social SciencesParisFrance

Personalised recommendations