The World Economy pp 187-213 | Cite as
Global Competition Moulds European Multinationals’ Responses to Regionalization
Abstract
Despite a completed Uruguay Round there remain many fears that the world economy may still fragment into adversarial trade blocs. In addition to the instabilities of the international system and the protective instincts of most governments, the behavior of some European multinationals adds fuel to those fears. These are the enterprises that actively bargain for continuing or newly imposed barriers to competition. Unlike their American counterparts, described by Louis Wells in a companion piece to this chapter as greeting the threat of trade blocs with a “big yawn”, there are pressures in Europe to take a more fearful view of the future. The origins of these fears lie in the strategies developed in the early years of firms’ international expansion. Yet the picture is confused, because there are many European multinationals that are equally as disinterested in how the world trading system continues to evolve.
Keywords
Foreign Direct Investment Trade Policy Multinational Enterprise Global Competition Harvard Business SchoolPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Albert, M. and Ball, J. (1984), Towards European Economic Recovery in the 1980s, New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. (1989), Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Bower, J. L. (1986), When Markets Quake, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Buckley, P. J. and Casson, M. (1985), The Economic Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bursi, T. (1989), Piccole e Medie Imprese e Politiche di Adattamento: il Distretto della Maglieria dei Carpi, Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
- Caves, R. (1982), Multinational Enterprises and Economic Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cline, W. R. (1987), The Future of World Trade in Textiles and Apparel, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- Davenport, M. (1990), The External Policy of the Community and its Effects upon the Manufactured Exports of the Developing Countries, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. XXIX, No. 2, December, pp. 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dicken, P. (1987), Global Shift: Industrial Change in a Turbulent World, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Dunning, J. H. (1988), Explaining International Production, London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
- Fouquin, M. (1991), “La dynamique interne du marché unique européen, ses conséquences sur les relations économiques internationales”, OECD Development Centre Research Programme on Globalization and Regionalization, mimeo, September.Google Scholar
- Franko, L. G. (1976), The European Multinationals, New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
- Franko, L. G. (1989), Global Corporate Competition: Who’s Winning, Who’s Losing, and the R&D Factor as one Reason Why, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 449–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Franko, L. G. (1991), Global Corporate Competition II: Is the Large American Firm an Endangered Species?, Business Horizons.Google Scholar
- Geroski, P. and Vlassopoulos, A. (1990), “European Merger Activity: A Response to 1992?”, in Continental Mergers are Different, Centre for Business Strategy, London Business School.Google Scholar
- Gogel, R. and Larréché, J-C. (1989), The Battlefield for 1992: Product Strength and Geographic Coverage, European Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 132–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1985), Do You Really Have a Global Strategy?, Harvard Business Review, July–August.Google Scholar
- Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1989), Strategic Intent, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 63–76.Google Scholar
- Julius, D. (1990), Global Companies and Public Policy, London: Pinter/The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
- Kotabe, M. (1990), The Relationship between Offshore Sourcing and Innovativeness of U.S. Multinational Firms: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 623–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kotabe, M. and Omura, G. S. (1989), Sourcing Strategies of European and Japanese Multinationals: A Comparison, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lawrence, R. Z. (1991), Scenarios for the World Trading System and Their Implications for Developing Countries, Research Programme on Globalization and Regionalization, OECD Development Centre Technical Paper No. 47, November.Google Scholar
- Lorenzoni, G. and Ornati, O. A. (1988), Constellations of Firms and New Ventures, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 3, pp. 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lynch, R. (1990), European Business Strategies, London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Mitsotaki, G. A. (1992), “Les enjeux de la construction européene, tels qu’ils ressortent des négotiations entre la CEE et le Japon en vue d’une limitation des entrées des voitures japonaises sur le marché européen”, OECD Development Centre Research Programme on Globalization and Regionalization, mimeo, January.Google Scholar
- Morrison, A. J., Ricks, D. A. and Roth, K. (1990), Globalization and Regionalization: Which Way for the Multinationals?, Organizational Dynamics, Winter, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
- Ohmae, K. (1985), Triad Power, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Oman C. (1989), New Forms of Investment in Developing Country Industries, Paris: OECD Development Centre.Google Scholar
- Onida, F. and Viesti, G. (eds.) (1988), The Italian Multinationals, London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
- Panić, M. (1991), “The Impact of Multinationals on National Economic Policy”, in Bürgenmeier, B. and Mucchielli, J. L. (eds.), Multinationals and Europe 1992, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pearce, J. and Sutton, J. (1985), Protection and Industrial Policy in Europe, London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. E. (ed.) (1986), Competition in Global Industries, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Prahalad, C. K. and Doz, Y. (1987), The Multinational Mission, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
- Rugman, A.M. (1986), New Theories of the Multinational Enterprise: An Assessment of Internalization Theory, Bulletin of Economic Research, Vol. 38, pp. 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Savary, J. (1984), French Multinationals, London: Pinter/IRM.Google Scholar
- Sharp, M. (1986), Inward Investment and National Industrial Competitiveness: A Comparative Study of Western Europe, SPRU, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
- Stopford, J. M. and Dunning, J. H. (1983), Multinationals: Company Performance and Global Trends, London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
- Stopford, J. M. and Strange, S. (1991), Rival States, Rival Firms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stopford, J. M. and Turner, L. (1985), Britain and the Multinationals, Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Teece, D. J. (1985), Transaction Cost Economics and the Multinational Enterprise: An Assessment, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Vol. 7, pp. 21–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vergara, W. and Brown, D. (1988), “The New Face of the World Petrochemical Sector: Implications for Developing Countries”, Washington, D.C.: World Bank, Technical Paper, No. 84.Google Scholar
- Waverman, L. (1991), “Strategic Trade Policy and 1992”, in Bürgenmeier, B. and Mucchielli, J. L. (eds.) (1991), Multinationals and Europe 1992, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Womack, J.P., Jones, D. T. and Roos, D. (1990), The Machine that Changed the World, New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar