The Napoleonic Empire: Collaboration and Resistance
Abstract
French rule brought old regime Europe face to face with revolutionary notions of equality and individualism, the end of privilege and seigneurialism, and the secular state. One effect of this was to impose a uniform system of values on a very wide variety of European cultures and traditions. European societies under French rule were given the same law codes, the same system of secondary education, similar fiscal structures, and a version of the Concordat with the Catholic Church. The Napoleonic bureaucracy was inspired by a passion for rational regulation which could, at its worst, smother independent initiatives and inhibit the development of a pluralistic Europe. The French even recommended this standardising tendency as a virtue. The rulers of Bavaria and Baden were advised that “the adoption of the Napoleonic Code will be a blessing for the peoples of these states as it will eliminate the variety of customs that rule them.”1 Local customs were here identified with feudal obscurantism.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Napoleon, Correspondance (Paris, 1858–70), vol.16, 31 octobre 1807.Google Scholar
- 2.S. Woolf, Napoleon’s Integration of Europe (London and New York: Routledge, 1991),p.l07.Google Scholar
- 3.O. Connelly, Napoleon’s Satellite Kingdoms (New York: Free Press, 1965), p.29.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Dunan, “Napoléon et le système continental en 1810”, Revue d’histoire diplomatique, 1946, 1.Google Scholar
- 7.S. Schama, Patriots and Liberators: Revolution in The Netherlands, 1780–1813 (New York: Knopf, 1977), pp.459–70.Google Scholar
- 8.S. Woolf, A History of Italy, 1700–1860 (London: Methuen, 1979), pp.191, 204.Google Scholar
- 9.M. Leonardi, “Democrates et masses populaires à Bologna (1796–1802)”, AhRf, 230, 1977, 528–39.Google Scholar
- 10.J.-P. Filippini, “Les Livournais et l’occupation française sous le premier Empire”, AhRf, 220, 1975, 203–30.Google Scholar
- 12.R. Dufraisse, “Elites anciennes et élites nouvelles dans les pays de la rive gauche du Rhin à l’époque napoléonienne”, AhRf, 248, 1982, 247.Google Scholar
- 13.Jeffry M. Diefendorf, Businessmen and Politics in the Rhineland, 1789–1834 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980), pp.156, 182–4.Google Scholar
- 15.P. Notario, La Vendita dei beni nazionali in Piemonte nel periodo napoleonico, 1800–1814 (Milan: Banca Commerciale Italiana, 1980).Google Scholar
- 16.W. Schieder, “Sécularisations et Médiatisations dans les quatre départements de la rive gauche du Rhin, 1794–1814”, AhRf 286, 1991, p.492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.F. Mineccia, “La vendita dei beni nazionali in Toscana (1808–1814)”, in I. Tognarini (ed.), La Toscana nell’età rivoluzionaria (Naples, 1985).Google Scholar
- 20.J.A. Davis, Conflict and Control: Law and Order in Nineteenth-Century Italy (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International, 1988), pp.25–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Michael Broers, “Revolution as Vendetta: Napoleonic Piedmont, 1801–1814”, Historical Journal, 33, 1990, 787–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Y.-M. Bercé, “Société et police dans l’ombrie napoléonienne”, AhRf 220, 1975, p.245.Google Scholar
- 24.L. Antonielli, “Le choix de prefets dans la république italienne et le royaume d’Italie”, AhRf 230, 1977, 548–65.Google Scholar
- 27.H.A.L. Fisher, Napoleonic Statesmanship: Germany (Oxford: Claredon Press, 1903), p.221.Google Scholar
- 32.V. Cuoco, Saggio storico sulla Rivoluzione Napoletana del 1799 (2nd ed. 1806), ed.F. Nicolini (Bari, 1926), p.90.Google Scholar
- 35.J.A. Davis, Conflict and Control: Law and Order in Nineteenth-Century Italy (Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International, 1988), chapter 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Gaetano Cingari, Brigantaggio, proprietari e contadini nel Sud (1799–1900) (Reggio Calabria: Editori meridionali riuniti, 1976).Google Scholar
- 39.Las Cases, Mémorial de Ste Hélène (Paris: Gamier, 1961), vol.2, p.546.Google Scholar