Once Upon a Time, the Novel Had a Structure

  • M. R. Axelrod

Abstract

Once upon a time the novel had a structure. That is to say, it appeared in a particular way, a ‘realistic’ way. This way was not Sterne’s way or Diderot’s or De Maistre’s, but Defoe’s and Richardson’s, since Sterne and Diderot and De Maistre wrote another way. Another novel way. The manner of the novel structure that finally became Scott’s had its origins in the ‘realistic’ patterns established by Defoe and Richardson whose allegiences to exterior settings and interior atmospheres, to life-like character representations and dialogues with tags, eventually yielded to Scott’s modification of the structure. Scott’s form became a way of disciplined categories of realistic representation, that is, a form which one could easily recognize (even without the blurb on the dust jacket) as being ‘a novel.’ It need not be belabored that the reason Scott became so popular was that he was able to develop a form of narrative discourse that both effectively fictionalized the historical discourse of the time, ‘showed a flair for the highly coloured, picturesque incident and situation and revealed himself a master of “tushery”,’1 and expanded on the techniques of Defoe and Richardson thus creating a ‘new realism’ that, for better or worse, has remained forever vital to today.

Keywords

White Sand Historical Romance Narrative Discourse Discipline Category Magical Realism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Daiches, A Critical History of English Literature, Vol. II (New York: Ronald Press, 1960), p. 835.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eric Quayle, The Ruin of Sir Walter Scott (New York: Clarkson N. Potter, 1968), p. 82.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Lewis Coser, Charles Kadushin, Walter Powell, Books: The Culture and Romance of Publishing (New York: Basic Books, 1982), p. 21.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    William Charvat, Literary Publishing in America 1790–1850 (Philadelphia, Pa.: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1959), p. 82.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Jean Kent and Candace Shelton, The Romance Writer’s Phrase Book (New York: Putnam, 1984), p. 5.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Edward Said, The World, the Text and the Critic (Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1983), p. 113.Google Scholar
  7. 13.
    Raymond Howes, Historic Studies of Rhetoric and Rhetoricians (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1961), p. 360.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    William Kennedy, Billy Phelan’s Greatest Game (New York: Viking, 1978), p. 1.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    Saul Bellow, The Dean’s December (New York: Harper & Row, 1982), p. 3.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Ernest Hemingway, Islands in the Stream (New York: Scribners, 1970), p. 3.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    Marie Shedlock, The Art of the Story Teller (New York: Dover, 1951), p. 13.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    José Ortega y Gasset, The Dehumanization of Art (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968), p. 90.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© M. R. Axelrod 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. Axelrod
    • 1
  1. 1.Chapman UniversityOrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations