Supporting the Iran—Iraq Cease-fire (1988– )

  • Alan James
Part of the Studies in International Security book series (SIS)

Abstract

The war which broke out in 1980 between Iran and Iraq seemed, on the face of it, tailor-made for strong UN calls for its cessation, followed by a tidying-up peacekeeping operation. To outsiders, hugely important issues did not seem to be at stake. Fighting was going on in a sensitive area, and threatened to — and later did — spill over into an even more sensitive one. The two combatants were non-aligned, and neither superpower was closely linked with either of them. Losses were considerable. And a decisive military outcome seemed unlikely. However, it was not until 1987 that the Security Council got around to demanding a cease-fire, and a further year was to go by before Iran — originally the injured party but latterly the more stubborn one — decided that the going was getting too tough.

Keywords

Security Council Ford Foundation Observer Group Injured Party Team Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  1. Shahram Chubin, ‘The last phase of the Iran—Iraq war: from stalemate for ceasefire’, Third World Quarterly, 11 (2) (April 1989).Google Scholar
  2. J. Duggan, ‘Iran—Iraq — a Solution in the Resolution’, An Cosantoir, 48 (10) (October 1988).Google Scholar
  3. Ford Foundation, The United Nations and the Iran—Iraq War (New York: Ford Foundation, 1987).Google Scholar
  4. Alan James, ‘The United Nations and the Gulf War’, Naval Forces, IX (VI) (December 1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Institute for Strategic Studies 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan James
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KeeleUK

Personalised recommendations