Abstract
As the smallest and weakest of the three states of Indo-China, and the only one without access to the sea, Laos faces severe constraints in the formulation and pursuit of foreign policy. The Lao People’s Democratic Republic (LPDR) is economically underdeveloped, socially fragmented and its military weakness is reflected in the presence for most of its existence of substantial foreign forces on Lao territory. Yet even given such limitations, opportunities do exist for the pursuit of specifically Lao national interests — notably preservation of the Lao state, development of a Lao national identity, and maximization of internationally provided resources for economic development.
Keywords
Foreign Policy Foreign Affair Friendly Relation Party Secretariat Asian Survey
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Adams, Nina S. and Alfred W. McCoy (eds) (1970), Laos: War and Revolution (New York: Harper & Row).Google Scholar
- Gunn, G. C. (1980), ‘Foreign Relations of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic: The Ideoloaical Imperative’, Asian Survey 20, 990–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Holsti, Kal (ed.) (1982), Why Nations Realign: Foreign Policy Restructuring in the Post-War World (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
- Langer, P. F. and J. J. Zasloff (1970), North Vietnam and the Pathet Lao: Partners in the Struggle for Laos (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lee, G. Y. (1982), ‘Minority Policies and the Hmong’, in M. Stuart-Fox (ed.), Contemporary Laos, 199–219.Google Scholar
- Ngaosyvathn, P. (1985), ‘Thai-Lao Relations: A Lao View’, Asian Survey 25, 1242–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Phomvihane, K. (1980), La Révolution Lao (Moscow: Editions du Progrès).Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1980), ‘Laos: The Vietnamese Connection’, in Southeast Asian Affairs 1980 (Singapore: Heinemann), 191–209.Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1981a), ‘Lao Foreign Policy: The View from Vientiane’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 11, 351–66.Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1981b), ‘Laos in China’s Anti-Vietnam Strategy’, Asia Pacific Community No. 11, 83–104.Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1981c), ‘Socialist Construction and National Security in Laos’, Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars 13, No. 1, 61–71.Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (ed.) (1982a), Contemporary Laos: Studies in the Politics and Society of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (St Lucia, Australia: University of Queensland Press).Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1982b), ‘National Defence and Internal Security in Laos’, in M. Stuart-Fox (ed.), Contemporary Laos, 220–44.Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1983), ‘Marxism and Theravada Buddhism: the Legitimation of Political Authority in Laos’, Pacific Affairs 56, No. 3, 428–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1986a), Laos: Politics, Economics and Society (London: Frances Pinter).Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1986b), ‘Laos in 1985: Time to Take Stock’, in Southeast Asian Affairs 1986 (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies).Google Scholar
- Stuart-Fox, M. (1987), Vietnam in Laos: Hanoi’s Model for Kampuchea (Claremont, Calif.: The Keck Center for International Strategic Studies, Essays on Strategy and Diplomacy No. 8).Google Scholar
- Viraphol, S. (1985), ‘Reflections on Thai-Lao Relations’, Asian Survey, 25, 1260–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wekkin, G. D. (1982), ‘The Rewards of Revolution: Pathet Lao Policy Towards the Hill Tribes since 1975’, in M. Stuart-Fox (ed.), Contemporary Laos, 181–98.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© David Wurfel and Bruce Burton 1990