International Historical Statistics pp 1-142 | Cite as
Population and Vital Statistics
Abstract
The principal modern sources of population data are official censuses and registration records. In Europe, the earliest regular enumeration of national population dates from around the beginning of the period covered in this work. But outside Scandinavia (and some though by no means all the Italian states), systematic census-taking and civil registration of births, deaths, and marriages have been nineteenth- or even twentieth-century phenomena. Historical coverage of the different countries, therefore, varies widely in scope. There is also good reason to believe, unfortunately, that it varies in accuracy. The almost universal tendency of censuses is to under-enumerate, though published results may also have been deliberately inflated on occasion for political purposes. A proportion of vital events similarly escapes the registrar’s net. But in most countries these tendencies have almost certainly declined over time, as officials have become more sophisticated, and as the population became more accustomed to procedures and less suspicious of their purpose. However, the increase in the number of town-dwellers living alone in recent decades, and, still more, the development of considerable immigration from poorer lands, may have reversed this process in some countries. Until quite recently1 there was no means of knowing either the extent of understatement or its variation over time, so for the most part it is impossible to do more than guess at margins of error in the past. By and large, it seems safe to take all regular censuses after the first two or three in a series as accurate to within five per cent overall.2 Isolated, sporadic censuses are probably rather less reliable in general.
Keywords
Civil Population Boundary Change Interwar Period Italian Province Demographic YearbookPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 2.Note, however, that in the case of Norway, the 1801 census is reckoned to be better than any other until 1865, though the other two early censuses (in 1769 and 1815) were the least good. [K. Ofstad, ‘Population Statistics and Population Registration in Norway’, Population Studies (1949).]Google Scholar
- 3.M. Drake, ‘The Growth of Population in Norway, 1735–1855’, Scandinavian Economic History Review (1965).Google Scholar
- 4.See D.V. Glass, ‘A Note on Under-Registration in Britain in the Nineteenth Century’, Population Studies (1951).Google Scholar
- 5.Cormac O’Grada, ‘The Population of Ireland 1700–1990: A Survey’, Annates de Demographie Historique (1979).Google Scholar
- 6.E.A. Wrigley & R.S. Schofield, The Population History of England 1541–1871 (London, 1981), especially pp. 269–284.Google Scholar
- See also the discussion in B.R. Mitchell, British Historical Statistics (Cambridge, 1988), pp. 2–3.Google Scholar