Crusoe’s Shadow: Christianity, Colonization and the Other
Abstract
The rise of the British novel is inextricably linked to the growth of the European colonialist project. In fact, Edward Said has recently suggested that “[w]ithout empire … there is no European novel as we know it” (Culture 69). The fact that Daniel Defoe’s great novel, Robinson Crusoe (1719), stands near the beginning of the rapid expansion of the novel as both a literary genre, and reflects the period’s imperialist discourse,1 prompted Martin Green to begin his study of the relationship between empire and the novel with the argument “that the adventure tales that formed the light reading of Englishmen for two hundred years and more after Robinson Crusoe were, in fact, the energizing myth of English imperialism” (3).2 While many studies of Defoe’s novel acknowledge this important link, very few adequately address Crusoe’s encounter with Friday. Such treatments briefly note that this meeting is a significant part of the novel, but then move on to other issues without examining the complex dynamic of their relationship. The expanding body of postcolonial criticism necessitates a proper examination of Robinson Crusoe’s representation of the meeting between a “civilized” European and a “savage” inhabitant of the New World since, as Helen Tiffin argues, this novel “was a part of the process of ‘fixing’ relations between Europe and its ‘others,’ of establishing patterns of reading alterity at the same time as it inscribed the ‘fixity’ of that alterity” (98).
Keywords
Evil Spirit Literary Genre Divine Revelation Light Reading Imperial ExpansionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
- Alam, Fakrul. “Religious and Linguistic Colonialism in Defoe’s Fiction.” North Dakota Quarterly 55 (1987): 116–23.Google Scholar
- Armstrong, Dianne. “The Myth of Cronus: Cannibal and Sign in Robinson Crusoe.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 4 (1992): 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Backscheider, Paula R. “Defoe and the Geography of the Mind.” Tennessee Studies in Literature 29 (1985): 41–65.Google Scholar
- Bell, Ian A. “King Crusoe: Locke’s Political Theory in Robinson Crusoe.” English Studies 69 (1988): 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhabha, Homi K. The Location of Culture. New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
- Blackburn, Timothy C. “Friday’s Religion: Its Nature and Importance in Robinson Crusoe.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 18 (1985): 360–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brown, Laura. “Amazons and Africans: Gender Race and Empire in Daniel Defoe.” Women, “Race, “ and Writing in the Early Modern Period. Ed. Margo Hendricks and Patricia Parker. London: Routledge, 1994. 118–37.Google Scholar
- Carter, Margaret Anne. Spiritual Rebirth in Robinson Crusoe: The Western Religious Search and Its Effect upon Friday. Diss. Claremont Graduate School, 1995.Google Scholar
- Cottom, David. “Robinson Crusoe: The Empire’s New Clothes.” The Eighteenth Century 22 (1981): 271–86.Google Scholar
- Defoe, Daniel. Robinson Crusoe. London: Penguin, 1965.Google Scholar
- Downie, J. A. “Defoe, Imperialism and the Travel Books Reconsidered.” Yearbook of English Studies (1983): 66–83.Google Scholar
- Gliserman, Martin J. “Robinson Crusoe: The Vicissitudes of Greed—Cannibalism and Capitalism.” American Imago 47 (1990): 197–231.Google Scholar
- Green, Martin. Dreams of Adventure, Deeds of Empire. New York: Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
- Griffiths, Gareth. “The Myth of Authenticity.” The Postcolonial Studies Reader. Ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. New York: Routledge, 1995. 237–41.Google Scholar
- Hammond, J. R. A Defoe Companion. Lanham, MD: Barnes and Noble, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Heims, Neil. “Robinson Crusoe and the Fear of Being Eaten.” Colby Library Quarterly 19 (1983): 190–93.Google Scholar
- Jager, Eric. “The Parrot’s Voice: Language and the Self in Robinson Crusoe.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 21 (1988): 316–33.Google Scholar
- JanMohamed, Abdul R. “The Economy of Manichean Allegory: The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature.” “Race,” Writing and Difference. Ed. Henry Louis Gates, Jr. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1986. 78–106.Google Scholar
- Jehlen, Myra. “Why Did the European Middle Class Cross the Ocean? A Seventeenth Century Riddle.” Discovering Difference: Contemporary Essays in American Culture. Ed. Christopher K. Lohman. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1993. 1–15.Google Scholar
- Lloyd, David. “Kant’s Examples.” Representations 28 (1989): 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maddox, James H., Jr. “Interpretive Crusoe.” English Literary History 51 (1984): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Richetti, John J. Defoe’s Narratives: Situations and Structures. Oxford: Clarendon, 1975.Google Scholar
- Ridley, Hugh. Images of Imperial Rule. London: Croom Helm, 1983.Google Scholar
- Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. New York: Vintage, 1993.Google Scholar
- Said, Edward W. Orientalism. New York: Vintage, 1979.Google Scholar
- Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1988. 271–313.Google Scholar
- Stafford, Fiona J. The Last of the Race: The Growth of the Myth from Milton to Darwin. Oxford: Clarendon, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Starr, G. A. Defoe and Spiritual Autobiography. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1965.Google Scholar
- Tiffin, Helen. “Post-Colonial Literature and Counter-Discourse.” The Postcolonial Studies Reader. Ed. Bill Ashcroft, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin. New York: Routledge, 1995. 95–98.Google Scholar