On the Divergence of Unionism among Developed Countries

  • Richard Freeman
Chapter
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

In this paper I explore the evolution of unionism in 1970s and 1980s when the post oil-shock world economy created a ‘crisis of unionism’ throughout the western world. I try to explain why union representation of work-forces fell in some countries but not in others and contrast union responses to the challenge of the period. I find that:
  1. 1.

    Rates of unionisation diverged greatly among developed countries (Section 2.1).

     
  2. 2.

    The composition of union members shifted from private sector blue-collar workers to public sector and white-collar workers in all countries, producing increased divisions within union movements by category of worker (Section 2.2).

     
  3. 3.

    Changes in the industrial composition of employment, changes in public attitudes toward unionism, and the growth of governmental protection of labour do not explain the divergence in density (Section 3.1).

     
  4. 4.

    Differing rates of inflation contributed to the divergence, with unions doing better in countries with high inflation. In addition, unemployment raised density in settings where unions disperse unemployment benefits (Section 3.2; Section 3.5).

     
  5. 5.

    The primary reason for the divergence are differences in the incentives and opportunities different industrial relations systems give employers to oppose unions. Unions fared best in neo-corporatist settings and worst in settings where decentralised bargaining creates a strong profit incentive for managers to oppose unions and where management is relatively free to act on that incentive (Section 3.3; Section 3.5).

     
  6. 6.

    Union organisations and modes of operating changed significantly in some countries with declining or endangered unionism but not it others (Section 3.4).

     

Keywords

Collective Bargaining Industrial Relation Union Membership Union Density Union Wage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference

  1. AFL-CIO Committee on the Evolution of Work (1985) ‘The Changing Situation of Workers and their Unions’ (Washington DC).Google Scholar
  2. Ashenfelter, O. and Pencavel, J. (1969) ‘American Trade Union Growth 1900–60’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, pp. 434–48.Google Scholar
  3. Block, R., Mahoney, C. and Corbitt, L. (1987) ‘The Impact of Employment-at-Will Judicial Decisions on the Outcomes of NLRB Representation Elections’, Industrial Relations Research Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting (IRRA).Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of National Affairs Directory of National Unions and Employee Associations, various editions.Google Scholar
  5. Chaison, G. and Rose, J. (1988) ‘Continental Divide: The Direction and Fate of North American Unions’, McMaster University, Working Paper no. 309, Hamilton, Canada, September.Google Scholar
  6. Crouch, C. (1985) ‘Conditions for Trade Union Wage Restraint’ in Lindberg, L. and Maier, C. (eds) The Politics of Inflation and Economic Stagnation (Washington DC: Brookings Institution).Google Scholar
  7. Freeman, J. and Medoff, J. (1979) ‘New Estimates of Private Sector Unionism in the United States’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 32, no. 2, January.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, J. and Pelletier, J. (1989) ‘The Impact of Industrial Relations Legislation on Union Density in the United Kingdom and Ireland’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, J. and Rebbick, M. (1989) ‘Crumbling Pillar? Declining Union Density in Japan’, Conference on Labor Relations and the Firm: Comparative Perspectives, Tokyo, 7 January.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, R. (1985) ‘Why are Unions faring poorly in NLRB Representation Elections?’ in Kochan, T. (ed.) Challenges and Choices facing American Labor (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  11. Freeman, R. (1986) ‘The Effect of the Union Wage Differential on Management Opposition and Union Organizing Success’, American Economic Review, May, pp. 92–92.Google Scholar
  12. Freeman, R. (1987) ‘Unionism and Protective Labor Legislation’, Industrial Relations Research Series, Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting (IRRA).Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, R. and Ichniowski, C. (1988) When Public Sector Workers Unionize (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gompers, S. (1965) Labor and the Common Welfare (New York: Arno Press).Google Scholar
  15. Hecksher, C. (1988) The New Unionism (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  16. Japan Ministry of Labour, Basic Survey of Trade Unions, Annual (Tokyo).Google Scholar
  17. Japan Ministry of Labour, Foreign Labour Trends, various editions.Google Scholar
  18. Japan Ministry of Labour (1971) Labour Bulletin, 1 March.Google Scholar
  19. Japan Ministry of Labour (1985) Labour Bulletin, 1 April.Google Scholar
  20. Kerr, C., Dunlop, J., Harbison, F. and Meyers, C. (1964) Industrialism and Industrial Man (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Kochan, T., McKersie, R. and Chalykoff, J. (1986) ‘The Effects of Corporate Strategy and Workplace Innovations on Union Representation’, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, July, pp. 487–501.Google Scholar
  22. Kumar, P., Coates, M. L. and Arrowsmith, D. (1986) The Current Industrial Relations Scene in Canada (Kingston, Canada: Queens University).Google Scholar
  23. Lipset, S. M. (1986) ‘Labor Unions in the Public Mind’, in Lipset, S. M., Unions in Transition (San Francisco: ICS).Google Scholar
  24. London School of Economics (1986) Centre for Labour Economics, OECD Data Set, updated 1988.Google Scholar
  25. McDonald, C. (1987) ‘The AFL-CIO Blueprint for the Future — a Progress Report’, in Industrial Relations Research Series, Proceedings of the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting (IRRA).Google Scholar
  26. Ministero del Lavoro e della Previdenza Sociale (1988) Report 1987 Labour and Employment Policies in Italy (CER-FGB, Italy).Google Scholar
  27. Nagashima, H. (1988) ‘Japanese Labor at a Turning Point’, Japan Update, Summer, pp. 15-17.Google Scholar
  28. Neumann, G. and Rissman, E. (1984) ‘Where have all the Union Members gone?’, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 2, no. 2, April, pp. 175–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD Employment Outlook, various editions (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  30. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (1986) Historical Statistics (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  31. Troy, L. and Sheflin, N. (1985) Union Sourcebook (West Orange NJ: Industrial and Labor Relations Data and Information Services).Google Scholar
  32. Visser, J. (1985) ‘European Trade Unions in Retreat’, Conference ‘Europa im Wandel’, Mannheim, 15–18 October.Google Scholar
  33. Wood, W. D. and Kumar, P. (1977) The Current Industrial Relations Scene in Canada: 1977 (Kingston, Canada: Queens University).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Freeman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations