The Punjabi Chieftains and the Transition from Sikh to British Rule

  • Andrew J. Major
Part of the Cambridge Commonwealth Series book series (CAMCOM)

Abstract

At the time of its partition in 1947 the Punjab was primarily a land of peasant proprietors and tenant cultivators. However, there also was — especially in the western districts that were incorporated into the new state of Pakistan — a landed élite: a heterogeneous class made up of the minor ruling princes, the large zamindars (landlords), who held estates that were mostly let out to tenants, and the principal jagirdars (holders of jagirs, or assignments of land revenue), who were the remnants of the old Sikh service aristocracy. Representing the leading families within all three of the undivided province’s main religious communities — Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs — as well as the patriarchal heads of the most powerful of the biradaris (clan brotherhoods), this landed élite was collectively referred to by the British as the ‘chiefs’ or ‘chieftains’ of the Punjab.1 For about ninety years these chieftains had been the faithful allies of British authority in the Punjab.

Keywords

Income Omic Verse Dian Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Short histories of these leading families are contained in G. L. Chopra, Chiefs and Families of Note in the Punjab (hereafter Chiefs and Families) (Lahore, rev. edn, 1940). This two-volume work is a revised and updated edition of earlier family histories written by British administrators like Sir Lepel H. Griffin and Colonel Charles Francis Massy. Other details are to be found in Titled Gentlemen and Chiefs other than Ruling Chiefs (hereafter Titled Gentlemen and Chiefs) (no author, Lahore, 1878).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. A. Talbot, ‘Deserted Collaborators: The Political Background to the Rise and Fall of the Punjab Unionist Party, 1923–1947’, The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, XI, 1 (1982) p. 74.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Craig Baxter, ‘The People’s Party vs. the Punjab “Federalists”’, Journal of Asian and African Studies, VIII, 3–4 (1973)Google Scholar
  4. Ronald J. Herring, ‘Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and “Eradication of Feudalism” in Pakistan’, Economic and Political Weekly, xv, 12 (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    Hamza Alavi, ‘Class and State’, in Hassan Gardezi and Jamil Rashid (eds), Pakistan: The Roots of Dictatorship (Delhi, 1983) p. 46.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    For details, see Indu Banga, Agrarian System of the Sikhs: Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century (New Delhi, 1978) ch. 3.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    R. H. Davies et al, Report on the Revised Settlement of the Lahore District in the Lahore Division (Lahore, 1860) p. 18.Google Scholar
  8. 16.
    Hardinge to Lady Hardinge, 2 March 1846: Bikrama Jit Hasrat (ed), The Punjab Papers: Selections from the Private Papers of Lord Auckland, Lord Ellenborough, Viscount Hardinge, and the Marquis of Dalhousie, 1839–1849, on the Sikhs (Hoshiarpur, 1970) p. 104.Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    The peace treaties are reproduced in J. D. Cunningham, History of the Sikhs (Delhi, reprint 1972) appendices xxxiv–vi.Google Scholar
  10. 22.
    Ganda Singh (ed), The Punjab in 1839–40: Selections from the Punjab Akhbars, Punjab Intelligence, etc. preserved in the National Archives of India, New Delhi (Amritsar, 1952) p. 91.Google Scholar
  11. 23.
    Bikrama Jit Hasrat, Anglo-Sikh Relations 1799–1849: A Reappraisal of the Rise and Fall of the Sikhs (Hoshiarpur, 1968), pp. 283–4Google Scholar
  12. General Sir Charles Gough and Arthur D. Innes, The Sikhs and the Sikh Wars: the Rise, Conquest, and Annexation of the Punjab State (Patiala, reprint 1970) pp. 65, 104, 138.Google Scholar
  13. 24.
    Major G. Carmichael Smyth (ed), A History of the Reigning Family of Lahore, with some account of the Jummoo Rajahs, the Seik Soldiers and their Sirdars (Lahore, reprint 1961) pp. xliii–xliv.Google Scholar
  14. 35.
    Frederick P. Gibbon, The Lawrences of the Punjab (London, 1908).Google Scholar
  15. 46.
    Lahore Political Diaries, vol. 4, pp. 171–2, 176, 194; Herbert Edwardes, A Year on the Punjab Frontier in 1848–49 (London, 1851) vol. 2, pp. 262, 574.Google Scholar
  16. 54.
    Kenneth W. Jones, ‘The Bengali Elite in Post-Annexation Punjab: an example of Inter-Regional Influence in Nineteenth-Century India’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, 3, 4 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 57.
    J. E. Cracroft, Report on the Settlement of the Rawul Pindee District (Lahore, 1864), pp. 140–65Google Scholar
  18. H. Mackenzie, Report on the Revised Seulement of the Goojerat District in the Rawul Pindee Division (Lahore, 1861) p. 153.Google Scholar
  19. 62.
    G. Ousley and W. G. Davies, Report on the Revised Settlement of the Shahpoor District in the Rawulpindee Division, 1866 (Lahore, 1866) p. 43.Google Scholar
  20. 65.
    It should be pointed out that here the British were often only completing a process begun by the Sikh monarchs. In Sialkot District, for example, there were by 1849 only two chieftain families left whose fortunes had been established prior to Ranjit Singh’s ascendancy; and their jagirs were confiscated after 1849 on account of their disloyalty in 1848–49: E. A. Prinsep, Report on the Revised Settlement of the Sealkote District (1863) of the Amritsar Division (Lahore, 1865) pp. 42–50.Google Scholar
  21. 70.
    Brandreth, quoted in R. Bosworth Smith, Life of Lord Lawrence (London, 1901) vol. 2, p. 13.Google Scholar
  22. 86.
    Secretary to GOP to Inspector-General of Police, Punjab, 27 October 1865, no. 1500: JDP, 28 October 1865, nos 27–9 (PS); Leslie S. Saunders, Report on the Revised Land Revenue Settlement of the Lahore District in the Lahore Division of the Punjab, 1865–69 (Lahore, 1873) pp. 68–9.Google Scholar
  23. 87.
    R. P. Nisbet, Report on the Revision of the Land Revenue Settlement of the Gujranwala District, 1866–67 (Lahore, 1868) pp. 47–9.Google Scholar
  24. 88.
    See D. G. Barkley, Directions for Revenue Officers in the Punjab (Lahore, 1875) appendix iv, pp. 113–14.Google Scholar
  25. 89.
    W. E. Purser, Final Report on the Revised Settlement of the Jullundur District in the Punjab (Lahore, 1892) p. 140.Google Scholar
  26. 90.
    Based on figures provided in T. A. Heathcote, The Indian Army: The Garrison of British Imperial India, 1822–1922 (Melbourne, 1974) p. 104Google Scholar
  27. S. P. Cohen, The Indian Army: Its Contribution to the Development of a Nation (Berkeley, 1971) p. 44.Google Scholar
  28. 96.
    See Imran Ali, The Punjab under Imperialism, 1885–1947 (Princeton, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. A. Low 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew J. Major

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations