Resources and Applications of Biotechnology pp 408-423 | Cite as
Biotechnology Policy into the 1990s
Chapter
Abstract
In recent years it has become increasingly important to determine methods by which science can be strategically planned. Financial restrictions on governments world-wide have meant that it is essential to observe and detect trends in technology and to discover what is necessary to encourage their proper growth. Technology policy has become the subject of serious research and Technology Policy Units such as that at the University of Aston in Birmingham are now providing valuable insights into the impact of new technologies on society.
Keywords
Science Citation Index Journal Citation Report Research Front Science Mapping Planning Intelligence
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
- 1.Coward, R. H., ‘Literature models of science for research planning’, and ‘Modelling science for research planning intelligence’. Unpublished documents, Centre for Research Planning, Philadelphia, undatedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Ellingham, H. J. T., Divisions of natural science and technology, in The Royal Society Scientific Information Conference Report, 21 June–2 July 1948, Royal Society, London, pp.477–484Google Scholar
- 3.Ibid., pp.480–484Google Scholar
- 4.Genetic Engineering Biotechnology Patents 1980–1981, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982Google Scholar
- 5.Narin, F., ‘Evaluative bibliometrics: the use of publication and citation analysis in evaluation of scientific activity’, N. S. F., Washington, D.C., 1976Google Scholar
- 6.Rothman, H., ABRC Science Policy Study: Further Studies on the Evaluation and Measurement of Scientific Research. Report for the ESRC. August, 1985; Healey, P., Rothman, H. and Hoch, P. K., An experiment in science mapping for research planning, Research Policy, 1986Google Scholar
- 7.Small, M. et al., Clustering the Science Citation Index: Scientometrics, 7, 391–409, and 8, 321–340, 1985Google Scholar
- 8.Turner, W. A., Courtial, J. P., Bauin, S. and Lampart, C.,‘Cartindex des sciences et des techniques’, Collogue de la NIDIST, les 24–26 février 1983, Assemblée Nationale, Paris; and Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A. and Bauin, S., From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis, Social Science Information, 22(2), 191–235, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Wishart, D., Clustan: User Manual, Programme Library Unit, Edinburgh University, Edinburgh, Scotland, April 1982Google Scholar
Bibliography
- 1.Biotechnology: A Review and Annotated Bibliography. Rothman, H. et al., London,1981Google Scholar
- 2.Op. cit., Monoclonal Antibodies: Another Success for Biotechnology. Parkinson, D.Google Scholar
- 3.Op. cit., The EEC Policy on Isoglucose. Crott, R.Google Scholar
- 4.Op. cit., Biotechnology World Patents Analysis. Marstrand, P.Google Scholar
- 5.Op. cit., Enzyme Technology Patents. Towalski, Z.Google Scholar
- 6.Op. cit., Microbiology: A Scientometric Analysis. Carson, J.Google Scholar
- 7.Op. cit., Historical Portrait of a Key Biotechnology Journal: Biotechnology BioEngineering. Rip, A. and van der Es, W.Google Scholar
- 8.Op. cit., Biotechnology Company List and Key Research Institutes. Rothman, H.Google Scholar
- 9.Op. cit., Measuring European Scientific Capability in Biotechnology. Rothman, H.Google Scholar
Copyright information
© The Editor and the Contributors 1988