SDI, Alliance Coherence, and East-West Nuclear Stability
Abstract
The nuclear modernisation programme, offensive and defensive, now being implemented or seriously proposed by the Western nuclear states and the Soviet Union pose critical problems for the stability of the European and global nuclear balance. The Reagan administration’s Strategic Defence Initiative (SDI) and the dramatic growth of British and French nuclear capabilities add new strains on the arms race now underway between the superpowers. Current and emerging instabilities must be addressed promptly along a broad political front, within and outside the framework of the Atlantic Alliance, before they further split the alliance and damage efforts — principally those being pursued at Geneva in the superpower arms control talks — to manage the nuclear balance and the conflicts that divide the two blocs in Europe and elsewhere.
Keywords
Nuclear Weapon Nuclear Force Reagan Administration Ballistic Missile Nuclear DeterrentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 2.Mikhail Gorbachev, For a Nuclear-Free World: Speeches and Statements by the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee on Nuclear Disarmament Problems ( Moscow: Novosti Press, 1987 ) pp. 722.Google Scholar
- 14.J. P. G. Freeman, Britain’s Nuclear Arms Control Policy in the Context of Anglo-American Relations, 1957–68 ( London: Macmillan, 1986 ).Google Scholar
- 16.Edward A. Kolodziej, ‘Nuclear Weapons in Search of a Role: Evolution of Recent American Strategic Nuclear and Arms Control Policy’, in Paul R. Viotti (ed.), Conflict and Arms Control: An Uncertain Agenda ( Boulder: Westview Press, 1986 ) pp. 3–23.Google Scholar
- 17.Jeffrey Richelson, ‘PD-59, NSDD-13, and the Reagan Strategic Modernization Program,’ The Journal of Strategic Studies, VI 2 (June 1983) pp. 125 ff. Also relevant is Desmond Ball, Targeting for Strategic Deterrence, Adelphi Paper 185 ( London: IISS, 1983 ).Google Scholar
- 39.Herbert York, Strategic Defense, from World War II to the Present ( San Diego: Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, 1986 ).Google Scholar
- 47.See David S. Yost, Deterrent Posture and Security in Europe, Part II: Strategic and Arms Control Implications, Adelphi Paper 195 ( London: IISS, 1985 ).Google Scholar
- 50.George M. Seignious II and Jonathan Paul Yates, ‘Europe’s Nuclear Superpowers’, Foreign Policy 55 (Summer 1984) pp. 40–53.Google Scholar
- 52.Robert S. Rudney, ‘Mitterrand’s New Atlanticism: Evolving French Attitudes toward NATO’, Orbis, XXVIII 1 (Spring 1984 ) pp. 83–101; interviews, London, February—March, 1987.Google Scholar