The “Figured Page”: Dramatic Epistle in Browning and Yeats

  • Daniel A. Harris
Part of the Macmillan Literary Annuals S. book series (MLA)

Abstract

In Yeats’s only dramatic epistle, “The Gift of Harun Al-Rashid” (1923; VP, pp. 460–70) the philosopher Kusta Ben Luka describes his bride’s fascination with his manuscripts; “I saw her stare,” he writes to Abd Al-Rabban,

On old dry writing in a learned tongue

On old dry faggots that could never please

The extravagance of spring; or move a hand

As if that writing or the figured page

Were some dear cheek. (ll. 122–7)

The “figured page” is a pun, replacing “pictured” in Yeats’s drafts.1 It implies more than the literal, “external marks” which Plato’s king considered a barrier rather than a mnemonic aid to understanding (Phaedrus, 274E–275A). It presents inscription as a “figure” or “type” of some unwritten signatum a meaning or truth which the writing cannot comprehend but which cannot be apprehended at all without recourse to writing; it thus invokes the dialectic between speech and writing, initially grounded in a logocentric metaphysics, which has prevailed in Western thought. But the “figure” is also a metonym of the writer, whether Kusta or another, who, while distinct from his text, is nevertheless represented by it; against “time’s disfiguring touch” (l. 110), the phrase poses the familiar Yeatsian antimony between the “perfection of the work” and the “wreck of body” its producer suffers (“The Choice”; “The Tower,” III). As past participle, “figured” implies that the bride has “figured out” (solved) the figural relation between the writer and the writing to see them as identical; embodies the indirect sociality of written discourse, the implicit interchange of persons which writing entails.

Keywords

High Criticism Male Culture Psychical Phenomenon External Reader Biblical Criticism 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jon Stallworthy, Between the Lines: W. B. Yeats’s Poetry in the Making ( Oxford: Clârendon, 1963 ) p. 82.Google Scholar
  2. 11.
    John Stuart Mill, “Carlyle’s French Revolution,” in J. B. Schneewind (ed.), Mill’s Essays on Literature and Society ( New York: Collier, 1965 ) p. 190.Google Scholar
  3. 13.
    George Eliot, “Introduction to Genesis,” in Thomas Pinney (ed.), Essays of George Eliot ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1963 ) p. 258.Google Scholar
  4. 24.
    William James, William James on Psychical Research, comp. and eds Gardner Murphy and Robert O. Ballou ( New York: Viking, 1960 ) p. 27;Google Scholar
  5. James H. Hyslop, Life After Death: Problems of the Future Life and Its Nature (New York: Dutton, 1918) pp. 74, 80, 88, 87. For Yeats’s familiarity with Hyslop’s work, see Harper (ed.), Yeats and the Occult, pp. 142, 149.Google Scholar
  6. 29.
    Rudolf Steiner, The Occult Movement in the Nineteenth Century and Its Relation to Modern Culture (1915;London: Rudolf Steiner Press, 1973) pp. 30–1; James, p. 27;Google Scholar
  7. C. D. Broad, Lectures on Psychical Research [The Perrott Lectures] (New York: Humanities Press, 1962) p. 253; Gauld, pp. 18n1, 76–7.Google Scholar
  8. 40.
    W. B. Yeats (ed.), The Oxford Book of Modern Verse, 1892–1935 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1936) p. ix; see also Au p. 267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Richard J. Finneran 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel A. Harris

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations